Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 591))

  • 3588 Accesses

Abstract

Deciding when to release a new product requires a tradeoff between costs, potential profits and the underlying reliability of a product. Many new products go through a “Test Analyze and Fix” process. When a failure occurs, an immediate design “fix” may occur or the product might undergo a minimal fix with design changes being delayed until later when many changes can be introduced at the same time. We introduce a Bayesian model that allows for the introduction of managerial knowledge and experience. Unlike most approaches, we do not build in an assumption that the product always improves throughout the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ireson, W.: Grant and coombs. In: Clyde Jr., F. (ed.) Handbook of Reliability Engineering and Management. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duane, J.T.: Learning curve approach to reliability monitoring. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. 2(2), 563–566 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crow, L.H.: Reliability analysis for complex repairable systems US army materiel systems analysis activity. Technical Report 138, Dec. 1975, AD-A020296 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Higgins, J.J., Tsokos, C.P.: A quasi-Bayes estimate of the failure intensity of a reliability-growth model. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 30(5), 471–475 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guida, M., Calabria, R., Pulcini, G.: Bayes inference for a non-homogeneous Poisson process with power intensity law (reliability). IEEE Trans. Reliab. 38(5), 603–609 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, J.-W., Tian, G.-L., Tang, M.-L.: Predictive analyses for nonhomogeneous Poisson processes with power law using Bayesian approach. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51(9), 4254–4268 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Singpurwalla, N.: A Bayesian scheme for estimating reliability growth under exponential failure times. TIMS Stud. Manag. Sci. 19, 281–296 (1982)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson, D.G., Dietrich, D.: A new nonparametric growth model. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 36(4), 411–418 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson, D., Dietrich, D.: A nonparametric-Bayes reliability-growth model. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 38(5), 591–598 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crowe, L.H.: Reliability growth assessments utilizing engineering judgements. Proc. Inst. Environ. Sci. 179–183 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wayne, M., Modarres, M.: A Bayesian model for complex system reliability growth under arbitrary corrective actions. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 64(1), 206–220 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wayne, M.: Modeling uncertainty in reliability growth plans. In: 2018 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rana, R., Staron, M., Berger, C., Hansson, J., Nilsson, M., Meding, W.: Analyzing defect inflow distribution and applying Bayesian inference method for software defect prediction in large software projects. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 229–244 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, G., Li, L., Li, J., Miao, Q.: Multi-stage Bayesian evaluation method of reliability growth for large complex system. In: 2015 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, J.Y., Yu, D., Xie, M., Hu, Q.P.: An approach for reliability demonstration test based on power-law growth model. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 33(8), 1719–1730 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, Z.S., Guo, J., Xiao, N.-C., Huang, W.: Multiple priors integration for reliability estimation using the Bayesian melding method. In: 2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ruiz, C., Heydari, M., Sullivan, K.M., Liao, H., Pohl, E.: Data analysis and resource allocation in Bayesian selective accelerated reliability growth. IISE Trans. 52(3), 301–320 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamranfar, H., Etminan, J., Chahkandi, M.: Statistical inference for a repairable system subject to shocks: classical vs. Bayesian. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 90(1), 112–137 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Pollo, M.: Objective Bayesian Inference for Repairable System Subject to Competing Risks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06466 (2018)

  20. Wayne, M., Modarres, M.: A Bayesian model for complex system reliability growth under arbitrary corrective actions. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 64(1), 206–220 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, M., Xu, D., Li, Z.S.: A joint modeling approach for reliability growth planning considering product life cycle cost performance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 145, 106541 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Trapnell, B.: Update on reliability fix effectiveness factors. In: Interim Note R-86. AMSAA, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brown, S.M.: Development and validation of methodology for fix effectiveness during product development. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schlaifer, R., Raiffa, H.: Applied statistical decision theory (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schafer, R.E., Sallee, R.B., Torrez, J.D.: Reliability growth study. Hughes Aircraft Co., RADC-TR-75-253 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gates, R., Gibson, G., McLain, D.: Reliability Growth Projections. Rome Air Development Study, TR 86-148, September 1986

    Google Scholar 

  27. Morris, S., MacDiarmid, P.: Reliability growth testing effectiveness. J. Environ. Sci. 28(4), 21–28 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crow, L.H.: A methodology for managing reliability growth during operational mission profile testing. In: 2008 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 48–53. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was accomplished with the assistance of T. Chu and forms part of his thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John G. Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wilson, J.G. (2020). Bayesian Modelling for Product Testing and Release. In: Lalic, B., Majstorovic, V., Marjanovic, U., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Digital Transformation and Innovation of Production Management Systems. APMS 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 591. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57992-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57993-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics