Skip to main content

Abstract

Historical and contemporary data on educational achievement suggest that the United States is still very much a nation-at-risk. Less than half of fourth-grade students read proficiently. Moreover, in response to market demands, few behavior analysts work in educational settings focused on academic skill-building, and few teachers receive coursework in behavioral education. Behavioral science, however, is well-positioned to inform and benefit the practice of teaching. Behavioral education, or the methods of academic skill acquisition informed by the science of behavior, offers a framework for a scientific approach to education that can alter the current trajectory in educational outcomes. In this chapter, the benefits of a behavioral education approach are discussed, illuminating the positive outcomes achieved with students as a result of these practices. Additionally, the cultural and ideological variables influencing the adoption and implementation of behavioral education practices are considered, and solutions for a path forward are offered. The chapter is concluded with a proposed course syllabus to increase exposure to behavioral education content in the training of teachers and behavior analysts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlquist, R. (2003). Challenges to academic freedom: California teacher educators mobilize to resist state-mandated control of the curriculum. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessi, G. (1987). Generative strategies and teaching for generalization. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392816.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Professional Behavior Analysts. (2015). 2014 U.S. Professional Employment Survey: A Preliminary Report. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu/~bcba/2014-APBA-Employment-Survey-Prelim-Rept.pdf

  • Axelrod, S., McElrath, K. D., & Wine, B. (2012). Applied behavior analysis: Autism and beyond. Behavioral Interventions, 27, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Luciano, C., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). From the IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6, 434–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrish, H. S., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in the classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R. (1979). Report for the Office of Education Joint Dissemination Review Panel. Great Falls: Precision Teaching Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R., & Clement, R. (1991). The Great Falls Precision Teaching Project: An historical examination. Journal of Precision Teaching, 8, 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. C. (1992). Direct instruction: A twenty-year review. In R. P. West & L. A. Hamerlynck (Eds.), Designs for excellence in education: The legacy of B.F. Skinner (pp. 71–112). Longmont, Sopis West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ training in empirically-v\validated behavioral instruction practices. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(3), 262–285. https://doi.org/10.2521/scpq.2006.21.3.262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for relational operants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bestor, A. E. (1953). Educational wastelands; the retreat from learning in our public schools. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C., & Watkins, C. L. (1989). Promoting effective instructional methods: Solutions to America’s educational crisis. Future Choices, 1(3), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C., & Watkins, C. L. (1990). Precision teaching and direct instruction: Measurably superior instructional technology in schools. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 3(4), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V., & Adams, C. (1990). A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders and reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 1027–1050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLA-CSIEP), 1(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, S., & Houmanfar, R. (2003). Self-Paced Interactive System of Instruction (SPIN) and Psych-ai Adaptive Instruction: A systematic comparison. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J., & Houmanfar, R. (2009). Differential effects of elaborate feedback and basic feedback on student performance in a modified PSI course. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(3), 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education. (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education. A report to the Department of the Interior and Bureau of Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, L. A. (1961). The transformation of the school; Progressivism in American Education, 1876–1957 (1st ed.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum – Based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exception Children, 52, 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. (1997). Whether thou goest: Perspectives on progress monitoring. In E. Kaneemui, J. Lloyd, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 77–99). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deno, S. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K. (2011). Teachers’ language practices and academic outcomes of preschool children. Science, 333(6045), 964–967. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Whiting, S. W., Rowsey, K., & Belisly, J. (2014). Assessing the relationship between intelligence and the PEAK relational training system. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(9), 1208–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Daar, J. H., & Williams, L. A. (2016). Derived equivalence relations of geometry skills in students with autism: An application of the PEAK-E curriculum. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0051-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Djulbegovic, B., & Guyatt, G. H. (2017). Progress in evidence-based medicine: A quarter century on. Lancet, 390(10092), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, S. (1970). The effectiveness of direct instruction on IQ performance and achievement in reading and arithmetic. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Disadvantaged child. Vol. 3, Compensatory education: A national debate. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, S. (1992). War against the schools’ academic child abuse. Portland: Halcyon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, S., Becker, W. C., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). The direct instruction follow though model: Design and outcomes. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4), 303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. (1991). Skinner, creativity, and the problem of spontaneous behavior. Psychological Science, 2(6), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00168.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Acton: Copley Publishing Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friman, P. C. (2010). Come on in, the water is fine: Achieving mainstream relevance through integration with primary care. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 19–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R. (2001). Remembering Wes Becker (1928–2000). The Journal of Special Education, 35(2), 115–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690103500207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Berens, N. (2009). Derived comparative and transitive relations in young children with and without autism. The Psychological Record, 59, 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, C. F., Hughes, C. J., Saville, M., Huxley, K., & Hastings, R. P. (2013). Teaching early reading skills to children with autism using Mimiosprout early reading. Behavioral Interventions, 28, 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R., & Anderman, E. M. (2013). In search of a useful definition of mastery. Education Leadership, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. V. (1991). Behavior analysis and education: An unfulfilled dream. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00947185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, E. (1972). Aims: Growing and sharing. In J. B. Jordan & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let’s try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 20–39). Arlington: Council on Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, E. (1981, March). R/APS and REAPS. Data-Sharing Newsletter, 33, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heward, W. L. (2003). Ten faulty notions about teaching and learning that hinder the effectiveness of special education. The Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690303600401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Todd, A. W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In L. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359–390). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffstetter, M., King, J. R., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Schneider, J. J., & Powell-Smith, K. A. (2010). Effects of a computer-based early reading program on the early reading and oral language skills of at-risk preschool children. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 15(4), 279–298. Retrieved October 5, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/52588/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (2015). Behavioral education in the 21st century. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(1–2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1036152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1994). The morningside model of generative instruction. In Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 173–197). Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 281–288.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Street, E. M. (2004). The Morningside model of generative instruction: An integration of research-based practices. Empirically Supported Educational Methods, 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. R., & Street, E. M. (2013). Response to intervention and precision teaching: Creating synergy in the classroom. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T., & Gollub, L. R. (1962). A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 543–597. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S. (1968). Good-bye teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1949). The psychology curriculum at Columbia College. American Psychologist, 4, 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubina, R. M., & Morrison, R. S. (2000). Fluency in education. Behavior and Social Issues, 10, 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubina, R. M., & Yurich, K. K. L. (2012). The precision teaching book. Greatness Achieved Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubina, R. M., Kostewicz, D. E., Brennan, K. M., & King, S. A. (2015). A critical review of line graphs in behavior analytic journals. Educational Psychology Review, 29(30), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9339-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layng, Z. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (2012). Building the case for large scale behavioral education adoptions. The Behavior Analyst Today, 13(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. (1972). From Skinner to precision teaching: The child knows best. In J. B. Jordan & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let’s try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 1–12). Arlington: The Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. (1992a). Why aren’t effective teaching tools widely adopted? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 21–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. (1992b). Precision teaching: Discoveries and effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(1), 51–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, O. R. (1996). The four free-operant freedoms. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 199–210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Cabello-Luque, F., & Hernendez, M. (2009). Developing self-directed rules. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 335–352). Oakland: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, S. M., Eigen, L. D., & Komosk, P. K. (1961). A programmed primer on programing. New York: Center for Programed Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S., Aninao, T., Newsome, K., & Newsome, D. (2015). Discovery though the lend of the standard celeration chart: Informing and facilitating inductive intervention strategies. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 20(2), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2017). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education. United States Department of Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board, Report on Mathematics and Science Achievement. (1999). Preparing our children: Math and science education in the national interest. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/1999/nsb9931/nsb9931.htm

  • Newsome, K., Berens, K., Ghezzi, P., Aninao, T., & Newsome, W. D. (2015). Training relational language to improve reading comprehension. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 15(2), 165–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome, D., Newsome, K., Fuller, T. C., & Meyer, S. (2018). How contextual behavioral scientists measure and report about behavior: A review of JCBS. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.11.005.

  • Normand, M. P., & Kohn, C. S. (2013). Don’t wag the dog: Extending the reach of applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 36(1), 109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). PISA 2015 key findings for the United States. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/pisa-2015-united-states.htm

  • Potts, L., Eshleman, J. W., & Cooper, J. O. (1993). Ogden R. Lindsley and the historical development of precision teaching. The Behavior Analyst, 16(2), 177–189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Program of International Student Assessment. (2015). Retrieved from www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/

  • Rafacz, S. D., Houmanfar, R. A., Smith, G. S., & Levin, M. E. (2019). Assessing the effects of motivative augmentals, pay-for-performance, and implicit verbal responding on cooperation. The Psychological Record, 69(1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richling, S. M., Williams, L. W., & Carr, J. E. (2019). The effects of different mastery criteria on the skill maintenance of children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(3), 701–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1976). Farewell, my lovely. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25(2), 218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1984). The shame of American education. American Psychologist, 39(9), 947–954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standards for NBPTS: The Five Core Propositions. (n.d.). Retrieved September 2019, from https://www.nbpts.org/standards-five-core-propositions/

  • Starlin, A. (1972). Sharing a message about curriculum with my teacher friends. In J. B. Jordan & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let’s try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 13–18). Arlington: Council on Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., McElwee, J., & Ming, S. (2017). Erratum to: Language generativity, response generalization and derived relational responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 33(1), 176–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0060-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, C. (1995). Dumbing down our kids: Why American children feel good about themselves but can’t read, write, or add. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiemann, P. W., & Markle, S. M. (1978). Analyzing instructional content: A guide to instruction and evaluation. Champaign: Stipes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torneke, M. (2010). Learning RFT: An introduction to relational frame theory and its clinical application. Oakland: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States, National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. L. (1988). Project follow through: A story of the identification and neglect of effective instruction. Youth and Policy, 10(7), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. L. (1997). Project follow through: A case study of contingencies influencing instructional practices of the educational establishment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, R. P., & Young, K. R. (1992). Precision teaching. In R. P. West & L. A. Hamerlynck (Eds.), Designs for excellence in education. Longmont: Sopris West.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, O. R. (1986). Precision teaching – Precision learning. Exceptional Children, 52(6), 522–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, O. R. (2005). Precision teaching. In M. Hersen, G. Sugai, & R. Horner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavior modification and cognitive behavior therapy. Volume III: Education applications (pp. 1433–1437). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, O. R., White, M. S., & Neely, M. D. (2019). Introduction. In N. G. Haring, M. S. White, & M. D. Neely (Eds.), Precision teaching – A practical science of education. Hudson: Sloan Education Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, F. M. (2000). Lessons to be learned from evidence-based medicine: Practice and promise of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based education. Medical Teacher, 22(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590050006214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. M., Giles, D. K., & Hall, R. V. (1968). Experiments with token reinforcement in remedial classrooms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6, 51–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zettle, R. D., Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Biglan, A. (2016). The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kendra Newsome .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Behavioral Education: Suggested Course Syllabus

Behavioral Education: Suggested Course Syllabus

Intention of the Suggested Course Syllabus: To organize the content of the preceding chapter, for students and faculty, in a 16-week semester format

Suggested Course Outline

  • Week 1: The promise of behavior science and Skinner’s vision for the field

    • Readings: Skinner, 1954; Skinner, 1974

  • Week 2: The failure of the U.S. education systems: Review policy and practice

  • Week 3: Current state of applied behavior analysis: Congruence or conflict with Skinner’s promise?

  • Week 4: Historical review of behavior analytic attempts to influence education: Part I Content acquisition

    • Readings: Watkins, 1988; Johnson, 2015

  • Week 5: Historical review of behavior analytic attempts to influence education: Part II Classroom behavior management

    • Readings: Horner, et al., 2005; Hill

  • Week 6: Worldviews and theories of teaching and learning in education

    • Readings: Hayes et al., 1988; Heward, 2003; Lindsley, 1992; Kubina & Morrison, 2000

  • Week 7: Measurement: The evolution of measurement practices in behavior analysis

    • Readings: Skinner, 1976; Kubina, et al., 2015

  • Week 8: Measurement: Dimensional vs derivative and non-dimensional measures of behavior

    • Readings: Newsome et al., 2018

  • Week 9: Precision teaching Part I: Lindsley’s operant freedoms

    • Readings: Lindsely, 1992; Lindsely, 1996; Potts, et al. 1993; White, 2005

  • Week 10: Precision teaching Part II: The standard celeration chart

    • Readings: Pennypacker et al. 2003

  • Week 11: Precision teaching Part III: Component-composite relations of academic skills and academic content standards

    • Readings: Johnson & Layng, 1994; White, 1986

  • Week 12: Precision teaching Part IV: Functional mastery

    • Readings: Haughton, 1981; Binder, 1996; Johnson & Layng, 1996; Guskey & Anderman, 2013

  • Week 13: Proximal and distal measurement

  • Week 14: Effective technologies of teaching

    • Readings: Binder & Watkins 1989 & 1990; Becker, 1992; Johnson and Layng, 1992; Markle, 1961

  • Week 15: Generative instruction Part I

    • Readings: Tiemann & Markle, 1978

  • Week 16: Generative instruction Part II: Relational frame theory

    • Readings: Newsome, et al., 2015; Stewart et al., 2017

Supporting Texts and Resources

  • Foxy Learningâ„¢ Tutorial on Relational Frame Theory.

  • Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist practitioner: research and accountability in the age of managed care. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.

  • Moran, D. J., & Malott, R. W. (Eds.). (2004). A Vol. in the educational psychology series. Evidence-based educational methods. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.

  • Pepper, S. (1942). World Hypotheses. London: University of California Press.

  • Kubina R.M., and Yurich, K.K.L. (2012). The precision teaching book. Lemont, PA: Greatness Achieved.

  • Rehfeldt, R.A., and Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2009). Derived relational responding applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities: A progressive guide to change. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

  • Torneke, N. (2010). Learning RFT: An Introduction to Relational Frame Theory and its Clinical Applications. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Newsome, K., Fuller, T.C., Meyer, S., Berens, K.N., Newsome, D. (2021). Behavioral Education. In: Maragakis, A., Drossel, C., Waltz, T.J. (eds) Applications of Behavior Analysis in Healthcare and Beyond. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57969-2_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics