Abstract
Historical and contemporary data on educational achievement suggest that the United States is still very much a nation-at-risk. Less than half of fourth-grade students read proficiently. Moreover, in response to market demands, few behavior analysts work in educational settings focused on academic skill-building, and few teachers receive coursework in behavioral education. Behavioral science, however, is well-positioned to inform and benefit the practice of teaching. Behavioral education, or the methods of academic skill acquisition informed by the science of behavior, offers a framework for a scientific approach to education that can alter the current trajectory in educational outcomes. In this chapter, the benefits of a behavioral education approach are discussed, illuminating the positive outcomes achieved with students as a result of these practices. Additionally, the cultural and ideological variables influencing the adoption and implementation of behavioral education practices are considered, and solutions for a path forward are offered. The chapter is concluded with a proposed course syllabus to increase exposure to behavioral education content in the training of teachers and behavior analysts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlquist, R. (2003). Challenges to academic freedom: California teacher educators mobilize to resist state-mandated control of the curriculum. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 54–64.
Alessi, G. (1987). Generative strategies and teaching for generalization. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392816.
Association of Professional Behavior Analysts. (2015). 2014 U.S. Professional Employment Survey: A Preliminary Report. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu/~bcba/2014-APBA-Employment-Survey-Prelim-Rept.pdf
Axelrod, S., McElrath, K. D., & Wine, B. (2012). Applied behavior analysis: Autism and beyond. Behavioral Interventions, 27, 1–15.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Luciano, C., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). From the IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6, 434–445.
Barrish, H. S., Saunders, M., & Wolf, M. M. (1969). Good behavior game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in the classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 112–124.
Beck, R. (1979). Report for the Office of Education Joint Dissemination Review Panel. Great Falls: Precision Teaching Project.
Beck, R., & Clement, R. (1991). The Great Falls Precision Teaching Project: An historical examination. Journal of Precision Teaching, 8, 8–12.
Becker, W. C. (1992). Direct instruction: A twenty-year review. In R. P. West & L. A. Hamerlynck (Eds.), Designs for excellence in education: The legacy of B.F. Skinner (pp. 71–112). Longmont, Sopis West.
Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ training in empirically-v\validated behavioral instruction practices. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(3), 262–285. https://doi.org/10.2521/scpq.2006.21.3.262.
Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for relational operants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45–71.
Bestor, A. E. (1953). Educational wastelands; the retreat from learning in our public schools. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393163.
Binder, C., & Watkins, C. L. (1989). Promoting effective instructional methods: Solutions to America’s educational crisis. Future Choices, 1(3), 33–39.
Binder, C., & Watkins, C. L. (1990). Precision teaching and direct instruction: Measurably superior instructional technology in schools. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 3(4), 74–96.
Bishop, D. V., & Adams, C. (1990). A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders and reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 1027–1050.
Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLA-CSIEP), 1(2), 1–12.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Butterfield, S., & Houmanfar, R. (2003). Self-Paced Interactive System of Instruction (SPIN) and Psych-ai Adaptive Instruction: A systematic comparison. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, CA.
Chase, J., & Houmanfar, R. (2009). Differential effects of elaborate feedback and basic feedback on student performance in a modified PSI course. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(3), 245–265.
Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education. (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education. A report to the Department of the Interior and Bureau of Education, Washington, DC.
Cremin, L. A. (1961). The transformation of the school; Progressivism in American Education, 1876–1957 (1st ed.). New York: Knopf.
Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum – Based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exception Children, 52, 219–232.
Deno, S. (1997). Whether thou goest: Perspectives on progress monitoring. In E. Kaneemui, J. Lloyd, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 77–99). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Deno, S. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 184–192.
Dickinson, D. K. (2011). Teachers’ language practices and academic outcomes of preschool children. Science, 333(6045), 964–967. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204526.
Dixon, M. R., Whiting, S. W., Rowsey, K., & Belisly, J. (2014). Assessing the relationship between intelligence and the PEAK relational training system. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(9), 1208–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.05.005.
Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Daar, J. H., & Williams, L. A. (2016). Derived equivalence relations of geometry skills in students with autism: An application of the PEAK-E curriculum. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0051-9.
Djulbegovic, B., & Guyatt, G. H. (2017). Progress in evidence-based medicine: A quarter century on. Lancet, 390(10092), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6.
Engelmann, S. (1970). The effectiveness of direct instruction on IQ performance and achievement in reading and arithmetic. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Disadvantaged child. Vol. 3, Compensatory education: A national debate. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Engelmann, S. (1992). War against the schools’ academic child abuse. Portland: Halcyon House.
Engelmann, S., Becker, W. C., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). The direct instruction follow though model: Design and outcomes. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4), 303–317.
Epstein, R. (1991). Skinner, creativity, and the problem of spontaneous behavior. Psychological Science, 2(6), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00168.x.
Ericsson, A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Acton: Copley Publishing Group.
Friman, P. C. (2010). Come on in, the water is fine: Achieving mainstream relevance through integration with primary care. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 19–36.
Gersten, R. (2001). Remembering Wes Becker (1928–2000). The Journal of Special Education, 35(2), 115–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690103500207.
Gorham, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Berens, N. (2009). Derived comparative and transitive relations in young children with and without autism. The Psychological Record, 59, 221–246.
Grindle, C. F., Hughes, C. J., Saville, M., Huxley, K., & Hastings, R. P. (2013). Teaching early reading skills to children with autism using Mimiosprout early reading. Behavioral Interventions, 28, 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1364.
Guskey, T. R., & Anderman, E. M. (2013). In search of a useful definition of mastery. Education Leadership, 19–23.
Hall, R. V. (1991). Behavior analysis and education: An unfulfilled dream. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00947185.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.
Haughton, E. (1972). Aims: Growing and sharing. In J. B. Jordan & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let’s try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 20–39). Arlington: Council on Exceptional Children.
Haughton, E. (1981, March). R/APS and REAPS. Data-Sharing Newsletter, 33, 4–5.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
Heward, W. L. (2003). Ten faulty notions about teaching and learning that hinder the effectiveness of special education. The Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690303600401.
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Todd, A. W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In L. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359–390). New York: Guilford Press.
Huffstetter, M., King, J. R., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Schneider, J. J., & Powell-Smith, K. A. (2010). Effects of a computer-based early reading program on the early reading and oral language skills of at-risk preschool children. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 15(4), 279–298. Retrieved October 5, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/52588/.
Johnson, K. (2015). Behavioral education in the 21st century. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(1–2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1036152.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1490.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1994). The morningside model of generative instruction. In Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 173–197). Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Pub.
Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 281–288.
Johnson, K. R., & Street, E. M. (2004). The Morningside model of generative instruction: An integration of research-based practices. Empirically Supported Educational Methods, 247–265.
Johnson, K. R., & Street, E. M. (2013). Response to intervention and precision teaching: Creating synergy in the classroom. New York: Guilford Press.
Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1980). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.
Kelleher, R. T., & Gollub, L. R. (1962). A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 543–597. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543.
Keller, F. S. (1968). Good-bye teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.
Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1949). The psychology curriculum at Columbia College. American Psychologist, 4, 165–172.
Kubina, R. M., & Morrison, R. S. (2000). Fluency in education. Behavior and Social Issues, 10, 83–99.
Kubina, R. M., & Yurich, K. K. L. (2012). The precision teaching book. Greatness Achieved Publishing Company.
Kubina, R. M., Kostewicz, D. E., Brennan, K. M., & King, S. A. (2015). A critical review of line graphs in behavior analytic journals. Educational Psychology Review, 29(30), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9339-x.
Layng, Z. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (2012). Building the case for large scale behavioral education adoptions. The Behavior Analyst Today, 13(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100718.
Lindsley, O. R. (1972). From Skinner to precision teaching: The child knows best. In J. B. Jordan & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let’s try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 1–12). Arlington: The Council for Exceptional Children.
Lindsley, O. R. (1992a). Why aren’t effective teaching tools widely adopted? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 21–26.
Lindsley, O. R. (1992b). Precision teaching: Discoveries and effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(1), 51–57.
Lindsley, O. R. (1996). The four free-operant freedoms. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 199–210.
Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Cabello-Luque, F., & Hernendez, M. (2009). Developing self-directed rules. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 335–352). Oakland: New Harbinger.
Markle, S. M., Eigen, L. D., & Komosk, P. K. (1961). A programmed primer on programing. New York: Center for Programed Learning.
Meyer, S., Aninao, T., Newsome, K., & Newsome, D. (2015). Discovery though the lend of the standard celeration chart: Informing and facilitating inductive intervention strategies. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 20(2), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101307.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2017). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education. United States Department of Education, Washington, DC.
National Science Board, Report on Mathematics and Science Achievement. (1999). Preparing our children: Math and science education in the national interest. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/1999/nsb9931/nsb9931.htm
Newsome, K., Berens, K., Ghezzi, P., Aninao, T., & Newsome, W. D. (2015). Training relational language to improve reading comprehension. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 15(2), 165–197.
Newsome, D., Newsome, K., Fuller, T. C., & Meyer, S. (2018). How contextual behavioral scientists measure and report about behavior: A review of JCBS. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.11.005.
Normand, M. P., & Kohn, C. S. (2013). Don’t wag the dog: Extending the reach of applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 36(1), 109.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). PISA 2015 key findings for the United States. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/pisa-2015-united-states.htm
Potts, L., Eshleman, J. W., & Cooper, J. O. (1993). Ogden R. Lindsley and the historical development of precision teaching. The Behavior Analyst, 16(2), 177–189.
Program of International Student Assessment. (2015). Retrieved from www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/
Rafacz, S. D., Houmanfar, R. A., Smith, G. S., & Levin, M. E. (2019). Assessing the effects of motivative augmentals, pay-for-performance, and implicit verbal responding on cooperation. The Psychological Record, 69(1), 49–66.
Richling, S. M., Williams, L. W., & Carr, J. E. (2019). The effects of different mastery criteria on the skill maintenance of children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(3), 701–717.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1976). Farewell, my lovely. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25(2), 218.
Skinner, B. F. (1984). The shame of American education. American Psychologist, 39(9), 947–954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.947.
Standards for NBPTS: The Five Core Propositions. (n.d.). Retrieved September 2019, from https://www.nbpts.org/standards-five-core-propositions/
Starlin, A. (1972). Sharing a message about curriculum with my teacher friends. In J. B. Jordan & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let’s try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 13–18). Arlington: Council on Exceptional Children.
Stewart, I., McElwee, J., & Ming, S. (2017). Erratum to: Language generativity, response generalization and derived relational responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 33(1), 176–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0060-8.
Sykes, C. (1995). Dumbing down our kids: Why American children feel good about themselves but can’t read, write, or add. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
Tiemann, P. W., & Markle, S. M. (1978). Analyzing instructional content: A guide to instruction and evaluation. Champaign: Stipes.
Torneke, M. (2010). Learning RFT: An introduction to relational frame theory and its clinical application. Oakland: New Harbinger.
United States, National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. Washington, DC.
Watkins, C. L. (1988). Project follow through: A story of the identification and neglect of effective instruction. Youth and Policy, 10(7), 7–11.
Watkins, C. L. (1997). Project follow through: A case study of contingencies influencing instructional practices of the educational establishment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.
West, R. P., & Young, K. R. (1992). Precision teaching. In R. P. West & L. A. Hamerlynck (Eds.), Designs for excellence in education. Longmont: Sopris West.
White, O. R. (1986). Precision teaching – Precision learning. Exceptional Children, 52(6), 522–534.
White, O. R. (2005). Precision teaching. In M. Hersen, G. Sugai, & R. Horner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of behavior modification and cognitive behavior therapy. Volume III: Education applications (pp. 1433–1437). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
White, O. R., White, M. S., & Neely, M. D. (2019). Introduction. In N. G. Haring, M. S. White, & M. D. Neely (Eds.), Precision teaching – A practical science of education. Hudson: Sloan Education Publishing.
Wolf, F. M. (2000). Lessons to be learned from evidence-based medicine: Practice and promise of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based education. Medical Teacher, 22(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590050006214.
Wolf, M. M., Giles, D. K., & Hall, R. V. (1968). Experiments with token reinforcement in remedial classrooms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6, 51–64.
Zettle, R. D., Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Biglan, A. (2016). The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science. Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Behavioral Education: Suggested Course Syllabus
Behavioral Education: Suggested Course Syllabus
Intention of the Suggested Course Syllabus: To organize the content of the preceding chapter, for students and faculty, in a 16-week semester format
Suggested Course Outline
-
Week 1: The promise of behavior science and Skinner’s vision for the field
-
Week 2: The failure of the U.S. education systems: Review policy and practice
-
Week 3: Current state of applied behavior analysis: Congruence or conflict with Skinner’s promise?
-
Week 4: Historical review of behavior analytic attempts to influence education: Part I Content acquisition
-
Week 5: Historical review of behavior analytic attempts to influence education: Part II Classroom behavior management
-
Readings: Horner, et al., 2005; Hill
-
-
Week 6: Worldviews and theories of teaching and learning in education
-
Week 7: Measurement: The evolution of measurement practices in behavior analysis
-
Week 8: Measurement: Dimensional vs derivative and non-dimensional measures of behavior
-
Readings: Newsome et al., 2018
-
-
Week 9: Precision teaching Part I: Lindsley’s operant freedoms
-
Week 10: Precision teaching Part II: The standard celeration chart
-
Readings: Pennypacker et al. 2003
-
-
Week 11: Precision teaching Part III: Component-composite relations of academic skills and academic content standards
-
Week 12: Precision teaching Part IV: Functional mastery
-
Week 13: Proximal and distal measurement
-
Week 14: Effective technologies of teaching
-
Week 15: Generative instruction Part I
-
Readings: Tiemann & Markle, 1978
-
-
Week 16: Generative instruction Part II: Relational frame theory
Supporting Texts and Resources
-
Foxy Learningâ„¢ Tutorial on Relational Frame Theory.
-
Hayes, S. C., Barlow, D. H., Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). The scientist practitioner: research and accountability in the age of managed care. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
-
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.
-
Moran, D. J., & Malott, R. W. (Eds.). (2004). A Vol. in the educational psychology series. Evidence-based educational methods. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.
-
Pepper, S. (1942). World Hypotheses. London: University of California Press.
-
Kubina R.M., and Yurich, K.K.L. (2012). The precision teaching book. Lemont, PA: Greatness Achieved.
-
Rehfeldt, R.A., and Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2009). Derived relational responding applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities: A progressive guide to change. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
-
Torneke, N. (2010). Learning RFT: An Introduction to Relational Frame Theory and its Clinical Applications. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newsome, K., Fuller, T.C., Meyer, S., Berens, K.N., Newsome, D. (2021). Behavioral Education. In: Maragakis, A., Drossel, C., Waltz, T.J. (eds) Applications of Behavior Analysis in Healthcare and Beyond. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57969-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57969-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57968-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57969-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)