Skip to main content

“Most Companies Share Whatever They Can to Make Money!”: Comparing User’s Perceptions with the Data Practices of IoT Devices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance (HAISA 2020)

Abstract

With the rapid deployment of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, it has been essential to address the security and privacy issues through maintaining transparency in data practices, and designing new tools for data protection. To address these challenges, the prior research focused on identifying user’s privacy preferences in different contexts of IoT usage, user’s mental model of security threats, and their privacy practices for a specific type of IoT device (e.g., smart speaker). However, there is a dearth in existing literature to understand the mismatch between user’s perceptions and the actual data practices of IoT devices. Such mismatches could lead users unknowingly sharing their private information, exposing themselves to unanticipated privacy risks. To address these issues, we conducted a lab study with 42 participants, where we compared the data practices stated in the privacy policy of 28 IoT devices with the participants’ perceptions of data collection, sharing, and protection. Our findings provide insights into the mismatched privacy perceptions of users, which lead to our recommendations on designing simplified privacy notice by highlighting the unexpected data practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    List of IoT Devices, compiled by Mozilla Foundation: https://mzl.la/2zOK4II.

  2. 2.

    Qualtrics is an online survey platform used to create, distribute, collect, and analyze survey data (www.qualtrics.com).

  3. 3.

    While considering all data types, the calculations of match and mismatch present a lower limit for the devices in “toys & games” and “pets” category, since some information are unavailable in their privacy policy (see ‘NA’ in Tables 1 and 2).

References

  1. Davinson, N., Sillence, E.: Using the health belief model to explore users’ perceptions of ‘being safe and secure’ in the world of technology mediated financial transactions. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 72(2), 154–168 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Emami-Naeini, P., Dixon, H., Agarwal, Y., Cranor, L.F.: Exploring how privacy and security factor into IoT device purchase behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 534. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan, D.: Majority of Americans have an IoT device - and they’re open to advertising, December 15, 2016, https://geomarketing.com/majority-of-americans-have-an-iot-device

  4. Lau, J., Zimmerman, B., Schaub, F.: Alexa, are you listening?: Privacy perceptions, concerns and privacy-seeking behaviors with smart speakers. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 1–31 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malkin, N., Deatrick, J., Tong, A., Wijesekera, P., Egelman, S., Wagner, D.: Privacy attitudes of smart speaker users. Proc. Priv. Enhan. Technol. 2019(4), 250–271 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald, A.M., Reeder, R.W., Kelley, P.G., Cranor, L.F.: A comparative study of online privacy policies and formats. In: Goldberg, I., Atallah, M.J. (eds.) PETS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5672, pp. 37–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03168-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Naeini, P.E., Bhagavatula, S., Habib, H., Degeling, M., Bauer, L., Cranor, L.F., Sadeh, N.: Privacy expectations and preferences in an IoT world. In: Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, pp. 399–412 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Page, X., Bahirat, P., Safi, M.I., Knijnenburg, B.P., Wisniewski, P.: The internet of what? Understanding differences in perceptions and adoption for the internet of things. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2(4) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patel, K.K., Patel, S.M., et al.: Internet of things-IoT: Definition, characteristics, architecture, enabling technologies, application & future challenges. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Comput. 6(5) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rao, A., Schaub, F., Sadeh, N., Acquisti, A., Kang, R.: Expecting the unexpected: Understanding mismatched privacy expectations online. In: Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, pp. 77–96 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schaub, F., Balebako, R., Durity, A.L., Cranor, L.F.: A design space for effective privacy notices. In: Eleventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, pp. 1–17 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng, E., Mare, S., Roesner, F.: End user security and privacy concerns with smart homes. In: Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, pp. 65–80 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Nasrullah Al-Ameen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4. List of IoT devices selected for the study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Al-Ameen, M.N., Chauhan, A., Ahsan, M.A.M., Kocabas, H. (2020). “Most Companies Share Whatever They Can to Make Money!”: Comparing User’s Perceptions with the Data Practices of IoT Devices. In: Clarke, N., Furnell, S. (eds) Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance. HAISA 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 593. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57404-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57404-8_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57403-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57404-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics