Skip to main content

The Ecobonus Incentive Scheme and Energy Poverty: Is Energy Efficiency for All?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions (SSPCR 2019)

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

With 2017, National Energy Strategy, Italy introduced a definition of energy poverty, combining three elements: the presence of a high level of energy expenditure, an amount of total expenditure below the relative poverty threshold and a null value for the purchase of heating products. The Integrated National Plan for Energy and Climate adopts the same definition, provides an estimation on the evolution of energy poverty in 2030 and lists the tax deduction scheme for energy renovation of the existing building stock (Ecobonus) among the specific measures dedicated to energy poverty. Implemented as an alternative measure under Article 7 of EED (European Energy Efficiency Directive), Ecobonus enables the households in the no-tax area—which are likely to be energy poor—to transfer their tax credits to financial institutions, work suppliers or other private entities, reducing the investment cost for energy/efficiency interventions. Based on information at the regional level, namely ENEA microdata on Ecobonus, this paper examines the possible relationship between indicators such as household income and the access to Ecobonus. Additionally, the study analyzes if this relationship changes for the different categories of interventions incentivized by Ecobonus, such as the replacement of windows and shutters or of heating systems. The hypothesis is that the incentive measure, with its current approach, has a regressive distributive effect on households, and it does not effectively support energy-poverty eradication. To our knowledge, the relationship between income and interventions incentivized by Ecobonus has not been investigated before, neither at the regional level nor in an energy-poverty framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In particular, energy poverty is mentioned in Art. 7 of Energy Efficiency Directive (2018/2002), Art. 2 of Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (2018/844), Art. 28 and 29 of Electricity Directive (2019/944) and Art. 2 of Governance Regulation (2018/2002).

  2. 2.

    More information can be found in Energy Efficiency Annual Report (ENEA 2019) and in Rapporto sullo stato della povertà energetica in Italia (OIPE 2019).

  3. 3.

    These rates have been modified by 2018 Budget Law (27 December 2017 no. 205) and confirmed by 2019 Budget Law (30 December 2018, no. 145). The recent 2020 Budget Law (27 December 2019, no. 160) is not taken into account here since the analysis is concentrated on 2018 data.

  4. 4.

    Maps are a tool more and more used to describe a wide range of phenomena, also thanks the availability of georeferenced data. Among other research, it is interesting to mention the work by Hills (2012) devoted to mapping energy poverty in the United Kingdom and the work by Lelo et al. (2019), aimed at mapping a wide range of social phenomena in Rome.

  5. 5.

    https://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=DCCN_SEQCONTIRFT, last accessed 2/12/2019.

  6. 6.

    https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/product?code=nrg_chddr2_m, last accessed 2/12/2019. In 2018, HDD in Italian regions ranged between a maximum value of 4,184 (Valle d’Aosta) and a minimum value of 946 (Sardinia). These two regions had the highest and lowest values also in 2016.

  7. 7.

    It is interesting to mention the local initiative “Reddito Energetico”, financing small photovoltaic installations in buildings inhabited by energy-poor households and also introducing a revolving fund. This has been implemented by Gestore Servizi Energetici in Sardinia and more information can be found in Energy Efficiency Annual Report (ENEA 2019).

  8. 8.

    Also, the tax deductions for refurbishment of existing buildings (Bonus Casa) would contribute to reach this overall figure. In 2018, interventions incentivized through Bonus Casa saved 0.225 Mtoe/year, whereas those incentivized by Ecobonus were 0.106 Mtoe/year.

  9. 9.

    Such a tool is perfectly in line with Art.10 of Energy Performance of Building Directive (2018/844). More information can be found on the project website www.enershift.eu.

  10. 10.

    More information on this incentive scheme for energy efficiency and renewable energy sources can be found in Ministerial Decree 16/02/2016.

  11. 11.

    In Italy, an EPC integrated database exists and is managed by ENEA: it currently includes the EPCs from seven regions and two autonomous provinces.

References

  • Bartiaux F, Schmidt L, Horta A, Correia A (2016) Social diffusion of energy-related practices and representations: patterns and policies in Portugal and Belgium. Energy Pol 88:413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry A (2019) The distributional effects of a carbon tax and its impact on fuel poverty: a microsimulation study in the French context. Energy Pol 124:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird S, Hernandez D (2012) Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters. Energy Pol 48:506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buildings Performance Institute Europe—BPIE (2014) Alleviating fuel poverty in the EU. Investing in home renovation. A sustainable and inclusive solution

    Google Scholar 

  • European Energy Network—EnR (2019) Energy poverty in the European Union

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2018a) Directive (EU) 2018/844 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings and Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency (Energy performance in buildings directive 2018/844, EPBD)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2018b) Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Governance Regulation)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2018c) Directive (EU) 2018/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 amending Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency (Energy Efficiency Directive 2018/2002, EED)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2019) Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU (Electricity Directive 2019/944)

    Google Scholar 

  • Faiella I, Lavecchia L (2015) Energy Poverty in Italy. Polit Econ 1:27–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Faiella I, Lavecchia L, Borgarello M (2017) Una nuova misura della povertà energetica delle famiglie. Roma: Banca d’Italia, QEF 404

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondazione Di Vittorio (2018) La povertà energetica e gli anziani

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills J (2012) Getting the measure of fuel poverty: final report on the fuel poverty review. CASE report 72. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion—The London School of Economics and Political Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Energy Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development—ENEA (2019a). Energy Efficiency Annual Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Energy Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development—ENEA (2019b). Annual Report 2019—Tax deduction schemes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Energy Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development—ENEA (2017). Annual Report 2017—65% Tax Deduction Scheme—Ecobonus

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelo K, Monni S, Tomassi F (2019) Le mappe della disuguaglianza. Donzelli Editore

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddell C, Guiney C (2015) Living in a cold and damp home: frameworks for understanding impacts on mental well-being. Publ Health 129:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntaintasis E, Mirasgedis S, Tourkoliasb C (2019) Comparing different methodological approaches for measuring energy poverty: Evidence from a survey in the region of Attika, Greece. Energy Pol 125:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osservatorio Italiano sulla Povertà Energetica—OIPE (2019). Rapporto sullo stato della povertà energetica in Italia

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpellini S, Sanz Hernández MA, Moneva JM, Portillo-Tarragona P, López Rodríguez ME (2019) Measurement of spatial socioeconomic impact of energy poverty. Energy Pol 124:320–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleich J (2019) Energy efficient technology adoption in low-income households in the European Union—What is the evidence? Energy Pol 125:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank all ENEA colleagues who contributed to the “2017 Annual Report—65% Tax deduction scheme—Ecobonus,” to the “2019 Annual Report–Tax deduction schemes” and to the “EnR Position paper on Energy Poverty in the European Union.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Martini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martini, C. (2021). The Ecobonus Incentive Scheme and Energy Poverty: Is Energy Efficiency for All?. In: Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Haarstad, H., Borsboom-van Beurden, J. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2019. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57332-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57332-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57331-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57332-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics