Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive and Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Pediatric Urology

  • 394 Accesses

Abstract

Varicoceles are relatively rare in boys and adolescent males. The literature is conflicted on the necessity of treatment of the entity, and is further divergent on the best approach if intervention is pursued. We, the authors of this chapter, believe that treatment is indicated in boys shown to have consistently divergent testicular growth over a year of observation. This chapter first details the evaluation and work-up for pediatric varicoceles, and then describes the aspects and considerations of the laparoscopic method. We find this approach to be most suitable given its relative ease to perform with minimal operative time and its outcomes and complication rates comparable to other techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akbay E, Çayan S, Doruk E, et al. The prevalence of varicocele and varicocele-related testicular atrophy in Turkish children and adolescents. BJU Int. 2000;86:490–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumanov P, Robeva RN, Tomova A. Adolescent varicocele: who is at risk? Pediatrics. 2008;121:e53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Skoog SJ, Roberts KP, Goldstein M, et al. The adolescent varicocele: what’s new with an old problem in young patients? Pediatrics. 1997;100(1):112–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li F, Chiba K, Yamaguchi K, et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on testicular volume in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Urology. 2012;79:1340–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kass EJ, Belman AB. Reversal of testicular growth failure by varicocele ligation. J Urol. 1987;137:475–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pastuszak AW, Kumar V, Shah A, et al. Diagnostic and management approaches to pediatric and adolescent varicocele: a survey of pediatric urologists. Urology. 2014;84:450–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Locke JA, Noparast M, Afshar K. Treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13:437–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chu DI, Zderic SA, Shukla AR, et al. The natural history of semen parameters in untreated asymptomatic adolescent varicocele patients: a retrospective cohort study. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13:77.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okuyama A, Nakamura M, Namiki M, et al. Surgical repair of varicocele at puberty: preventive treatment for fertility improvement. J Urol. 1988;139:562–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lipshultz LI, Corriere JN. Progressive testicular atrophy in the varicocele patient. J Urol. 1977;117:175–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Palomo A. Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique: preliminary report. J Urol. 1949;61:604–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aaberg RA, Vancaillie TG, Schuessler WW. Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: a new technique. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:776–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Podkamenev VV, Stalmakhovich VN, Urkov PS, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for pediatric varicoceles: randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:727–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Parrilli A, Roberti A, Escolino M, et al. Surgical approaches for varicocele in pediatric patient. Transl Pediatr. 2016;5:227–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakamoto H, Saito K, Oohta M, et al. Testicular volume measurement: comparison of ultrasonography, orchidometry, and water displacement. Urology. 2007;69:152–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diamond DA, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB, et al. Relationship of varicocele grade and testicular hypotrophy to semen parameters in adolescents. J Urol. 2007;178:1584–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolon TF, Clement MR, Cartwright L, et al. Transient asynchronous testicular growth in adolescent males with a varicocele. J Urol. 2008;180:1111–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spinelli C, Di Giacomo M, Lo Piccolo R, et al. The role of testicular volume in adolescents with varicocele: the better way and time of surgical treatment. J Urol. 2010;184:1722–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Diamond DA, Gargollo PC, Caldamone AA. Current management principles for adolescent varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1294–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehta A, Sigman M. The adult urologist’s perspective on management of varicoceles in the pediatric population. Dialogues Pediatr Urol. 2008;30:2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nork JJ, Berger JH, Crain DS, et al. Youth varicocele and varicocele treatment: a meta-analysis of semen outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:381–387.e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fine RG, Gitlin J, Reda EF, et al. Barriers to use of semen analysis in the adolescent with a varicocele: survey of patient, parental, and practitioner attitudes. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12:41.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moursy EES, ElDahshoury MZ, Hussein MM, et al. Dilemma of adolescent varicocele: long-term outcome in patients managed surgically and in patients managed expectantly. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:1018–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Borruto FA, Impellizzeri P, Antonuccio P, et al. Laparoscopic vs open varicocelectomy in children and adolescents: review of the recent literature and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:2464–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jarow JP, Assimos DG, Pittaway DE. Effectiveness of laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Urology. 1993;42:544–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Esposito C, Monguzzi G, Gonzalez-Sabin MA, et al. Results and complications of laparoscopic surgery for pediatric varicocele. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:767–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McManus MC, Barqawi A, Meacham RB, et al. Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: are there advantages compared with the microscopic subinguinal approach? Urology. 2004;64:357–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cuda SP, Musser JE, Belnap CM, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of arterial injury in varicocele repair: arterial injury in varicocele repair. BJU Int. 2011;107:1635–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Atassi O, Kass EJ, Steinert BW. Testicular growth after successful varicocele correction in adolescents: comparison of artery sparing techniques with the Palomo procedure. J Urol. 1995;153:482–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Oswald J, Körner I, Riccabona M. The use of isosulphan blue to identify lymphatic vessels in high retroperitoneal ligation of adolescent varicocele – avoiding postoperative hydrocele. BJU Int. 2001;87:502–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Capolicchio J-P, El-Sherbiny M, Brzezinski A, et al. Dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:33–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. D’Alessio A, Piro E, Beretta F, et al. Lymphatic preservation using methylene blue dye during varicocele surgery: a single-center retrospective study. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:138–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ishibashi H, Mori H, Yada K, et al. Indigo carmine dye-assisted lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy in children. J Med Investig. 2014;61:151–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Esposito C, Iaquinto M, Escolino M, et al. Technical standardization of laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy in children using isosulfan blue. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:660–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital, Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, New York, NY, USA

    Christina P. Carpenter

  2. LeBonheur Children’s Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Department of Pediatric Urology, Memphis, TN, USA

    Dana W. Giel

Authors
  1. Christina P. Carpenter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dana W. Giel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Christina P. Carpenter or Dana W. Giel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Patricio C. Gargollo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carpenter, C.P., Giel, D.W. (2020). Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy. In: Gargollo, P.C. (eds) Minimally Invasive and Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Pediatric Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57219-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57219-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57218-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57219-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation