Skip to main content

Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Based on Uncertain Linguistic Operators in Neutrosophic Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neutrosophic Operational Research
  • 317 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the concept of interval neutrosophic numbers (INNs) and IN uncertain linguistic numbers (INULNs) is considered as an advanced generalization of uncertain linguistic numbers (UINs) and interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic numbers (IVIULNs). Firstly, INUL operators, namely, INUL weighted average and INUL weighted geometric operators labelled as INULWA and INULWG operator, have been constructed, further, in the same environment, introducing INUL Dombi weighted average and INUL Dombi weighted geometric operator, symbolically presented as INULDWA and INULDWG operators. These operators have been utilized to develop a multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) approach with INUL information. Finally, an application of mutual fund selection problems has been introduced by an example. A comparison approach to the issues proposed is studied with the actual result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smarandache, F. (1999). A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic probability, set and logic. Rehoboth: American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smarandache, F. (2005). Neutrosophic set—A generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 24(3), 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atanassov, K. T. (1999). On intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory. Studies in fuzziness and soft computing (p. 283). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y. Q., & Sunderraman, R. (2010). Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace and Multistructure, 4, 410–413.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ye, J. (2014). Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria decision-making. Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems, 26, 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan, R., Zhang, W., & Chen, S. (2017). Some generalized single-valued neutrosophic linguistic operators and their application to multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 5(2), 148–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, Q., Wu, P., Zhou, L., Chen, H., & Guan, X. (2018). Some new Hamacher aggregation operators under single-valued neutrosophic 2-tuple linguistic environment and their applications to multiattribute group decision making. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 116, 144–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ye, J. (2016). Aggregation operators of neutrosophic linguistic numbers for multiple attribute group decision making. Springerplus, 5, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye, J. (2014). Some aggregation operators of interval neutrosophic linguistic numbers for multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems, 27, 2231–2241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yager, R. R. (1998). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(1), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yager, R. R., & Kacprzyk, J. (1997). The ordered weighted averaging operators: Theory and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Beliakov, G., Pradera, A., & Calvo, T. (2007). Aggregation functions: A guide for practitioners. Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deschrijver, G., Cornelis, C., & Kerre, E. E. (2004). On the representation of intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 12, 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, Z. S. (2007). Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15(6), 1179–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Elhoseny, M., & Chang, V. (2020). Evaluation framework for smart disaster response systems in uncertainty environment. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 145, 106941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jana, C., Pal, M., & Wang, J. Q. (2019). Bipolar fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its application in multiple attribute decision making process. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10, 3533–3549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jana, C., Senapati, T., Pal, M., & Yager, R. R. (2019). Picture fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators: Application to MADM process. Applied Soft Computing, 74(1), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jana, C., & Pal, M. (2019). Assessment of enterprise performance based on picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators. Symmetry, 11(1), 75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jana, C., & Pal, M. (2019). A robust single-valued neutrosophic soft aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. Symmetry, 11(1), 110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jana, C., Senapati, T., & Pal, M. (2019). Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its applications in multiple attribut decision-making. International Journal of Intelligence Systems, 34(9), 2019–2038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jana, C., Pal, M., & Wang, J. Q. (2020). Bipolar fuzzy Dombi prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Soft Computing, 24, 3631–3646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rani, D., & Garg, H. (2018). Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multicriteria decision-making. Expert Systems, 35, e12325. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wei, G. W., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Some single-valued neutrosophic Bonferroni power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10, 863–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, H. Y., Wang, J. Q., & Chen, X. H. (2014). Interval neutrosophic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making problems. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 645953, 15 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abdel-Basset, M., Ali, M., & Atef, A. (2020). Uncertainty assessments of linear time-cost tradeoffs using neutrosophic set. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 141, 106286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdel-Basset, M., Ali, M., & Atef, A. (2020). Resource levelling problem in construction projects under neutrosophic environment. The Journal of Supercomputing, 76(2), 964–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdel-Basset, M., Gamal, A., Son, L. H., & Smarandache, F. (2020). A bipolar neutrosophic multi criteria decision making framework for professional selection. Applied Sciences, 10(4), 1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Zaied, A. E. N. H., Gamal, A., & Smarandache, F. (2020). Solving the supply chain problem using the best-worst method based on a novel Plithogenic model. In F. Smarandache & M. Abdel-Basset (Eds.), Optimization theory based on neutrosophic and plithogenic sets (pp. 1–19). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ye, J. (2014). A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets. Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems, 26, 2459–2466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Peng, J., Wang, J. Q., & Chen, H. (2014). Simplified neutrosophic sets and their applications in multi-citeria group decision making problems. International Journal of Systems Science, 47(10), 2342–2358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bausys, R., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Multicriteria decision making approach by VIKOR under interval neutrosophic set environment. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 4, 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jana, C., Muhiuddin, G., & Pal, M. (2019). Multiple-attribute decision making problems based on SVTNH methods. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11, 3117–3733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01568-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Broumi, S., & Smarandache, F. (2014). Single valued neutrosophic trapezoid linguistic aggregation operators based multi-attribute decision making. Bulletin of Pure & Applied Sciences, 33(2), 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ji, P., Wang, J. Q., & Zhang, H. Y. (2018). Frank prioritized Bonferroni mean operator with single-valued neutrosophic sets and its application in selecting third-party logistics providers. Neural Computing and Applications, 30(3), 799–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, H. Y., Ji, P., Wang, J. Q., & Chen, X. H. (2016). A neutrosophic normal cloud and its application in decision-making. Cognitive Computation, 8(4), 649–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sahin, R., & Liu, P. (2017). Correlation coefficient of single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy sets and its applications in decision making. Neural Computing and Applications, 28(6), 1387–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nancy, & Garg, H. (2016). Novel single-valued neutrosophic aggregated operators under frank norm operation and its application to decision-making process. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantifcation, 6(4), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., & Giri, B. C. (2014). A new methodology for neutrosophic multi-attribute decisionmaking with unknown weight information. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 3, 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., & Giri, B. C. (2016). TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(3), 727–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, P., Zhang, L., Liu, X., & Wang, P. (2016). Multi-valued neutrosophic number Bonferroni mean operators with their applications in multiple attribute group decision making. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 15, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jana, C., Pal, M., Karaaslan, F., & Wang, J. Q. (2018). Trapezoidal neutrosophic aggregation operators and its application in multiple attribute decision-making process. Scientia Iranica E, 27, 1655–1673. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2018.51136.2024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lu, Z., & Ye, J. (2014). Single-valued neutrosophic hybrid arithmetic and geometric aggregation operators and their decision-making method. Information, 8, 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Broumi, S., Bakali, A., Talea, M., Smarandache, F., Krishnan Kishore, K. P., & Sahin, R. (2018). Shortest path problem under interval valued neutrosophic setting. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 10(4S), 168–174.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., Zhou, Y., & Hezam, I. (2017). Multi-criteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems, 33(6), 4055–4066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., & Smarandache, F. (2018). An extension of neutrosophic AHP-SWOT analysis for strategic planning and decision-making. Symmetry, 10(4), 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pramanik, S., Dalapati, S., Alam, S., Smarandache, F., & Roy, T. K. (2018). NS-cross entropy based MAGDM under single valued neutrosophic set environment. Information, 9(2), 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ye, J. (2013). Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. International Journal of General Systems, 42(4), 386–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zadeh, L. A. (1975–1976). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Part 1, 2 and 3, Information Sciences, 8, 199–249, 301–357; 9, 43–80.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. L. (1996). A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu, Z. S. (2006). Goal programming models for multiple attribute decision making under linguistic setting. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 9(2), 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wang, J. Q., & Li, H. B. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making based on aggregation operators for intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy numbers. Control and Decision, 25(10), 1571–1574.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Xu, Z. S. (2004). Uncertain multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Beijing: Tsinghua, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Xu, Z. S. (2006). An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Decision Support Systems, 41, 488–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu, Z. S. (2006). Induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators applied to group decision making. Information Fusion, 7, 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Xu, Z. S. (2004). Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. Information Sciences, 168, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu, P., & Jin, F. (2012). Methods for aggregating intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their application to group decision making. Information Sciences, 205, 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Meng, F., Chen, X., & Zhang, Q. (2014). Some interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic Choquet operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38, 2543–2557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y. Q., & Sunderraman, R. (2005). Interval neutrosophic sets and logic: Theory and applications in computing. Phoenix, AZ: Hexis.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Smarandache, F. (1998). Neutrosophy. neutrosophic probability, set, and logic (p. 105). Ann Arbor, Michigan: ProQuest Information and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Martinez, L. (2000). A fusion approach for managing multigranularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kacprzyk, J. (1986). Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18, 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu, P., Liu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2014). Some intuitionistic uncertain linguistic Heronian mean operators and their application to group decision making. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 230, 570–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zadeh, L. A. (1983). A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computers & Mathematcs with Applications, 9, 149–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Xu, Z. S., & Da, Q. L. (2002). The uncertain OWA operator. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 17(6), 569–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments and suggestions that have been helpful for providing a better version of the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jana, C., Pal, M. (2021). Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Based on Uncertain Linguistic Operators in Neutrosophic Environment. In: Smarandache, F., Abdel-Basset, M. (eds) Neutrosophic Operational Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57197-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics