Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive Ability, Personality, and Privilege: A Trait-Complex Approach to Talent Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent

Abstract

Trait complexes of cognitive ability, personality, and privilege can be used to conceptualize potential future roles of gifted adolescent students. The Counseling Laboratory for the Exploration of Optimal States (CLEOS) uses ACT scores; Big Five personality factors; and intersectional measures of gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status used to assess distance from privilege. Combinations of these characteristics can be organized into a “Beehive,” in which professional workers (Worker Bees), nurturing and healing professions (Honeybees), business and political leaders (Strivers), scholars (Foragers), innovators (Drones), and visionaries (Queens) are represented. Combinations of ability and personality suggest the domain of work that may be appropriate and the training needed, while the addition of intersectional privilege suggests the social, cultural, and financial capital that are necessary for the attainment of the highest status within each domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (1999). Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds incremental validity to abilities: A discriminant analysis of educational outcomes over a 10-year interval. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L. (2000). Domain-specific knowledge as the “dark matter” of adult intelligence: Gf/Gc, personality and interest correlates. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Science, 55, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L., Bowen, K. R., Beier, M. E., & Kanfer, R. (2001). Determinants of individual differences and gender differences in knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 797–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, P. L., Kanfer, R., & Beier, M. E. (2013). Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, STEM persistence, and gender differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 911–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J., Radunzel, J., & Moore, J. (2017). Evidence for standard setting: Probabilities of success in “Benchmark” College courses, by ACT test scores. Technical Brief. ACT, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, M., van Weegen, F. I., van Beijsterveldt, C. E., Carlier, M., Polderman, T. J., Hoekstra, R. A., & Boomsma, D. I. (2012). The five-factor model of personality and intelligence: A twin study on the relationship between the two constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2013). Teachers’ implicit personality theories about the gifted: An experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergold, S., & Steinmayr, R. (2018). Personality and intelligence interact in the prediction of academic achievement. Journal of Intelligence, 6, 27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., Kurzweil, M. A., Tobin, E. M., & Pichler, S. C. (2005). Equity and excellence in American higher education (Thomas Jefferson Foundation distinguished lecture series). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, C. M., Fernandes, C., Smith, P., Visscher, P. M., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Sex, intelligence and educational achievement in a national cohort of over 175,000 11-year-old schoolchildren in England. Intelligence, 38, 424–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2004). A possible model for understanding the personality-intelligence interface. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2006). Intellectual competence and the intelligent personality: A third way in differential psychology. Review of General Psychology, 10, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Moutafi, J., & Furnham, A. (2005). The relationship between personality traits, subjectively-assessed and fluid intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1517–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, S. J. (1988). Assessing the gifted child and adolescent. Handbook of clinical assessment of children and adolescents, 355–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 492–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damian, R. I., Su, R., Shanahan, M., Trautwein, U., & Roberts, B. W. (2015). Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Higgins, A., Allison, C., & Morton, L. C. (2012). Gender differences in self conscious emotional experience: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 947–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farsides, T., & Woodfield, R. (2003). Individual differences and undergraduate academic success: The roles of personality, intelligence, and application. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1225–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 420–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Few-Demo, A. L. (2014). Intersectionality as the “new” critical approach in feminist family studies: Evolving racial/ethnic feminisms and critical race theories. Journal of Family Theory, 6, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. Y. (2014). Segregation and the underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in gifted education: Social inequality and deficit paradigms. Roeper Review, 36(3), 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, M. C. (2019). What we know, are still getting wrong, and have yet to learn about the relationships among the SAT, intelligence and achievement. Journal of Intelligence, 7, 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15, 373–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & McDougall, F. (2003). Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. K., & Watson, D. (2002). General and specific traits of personality and their relation to sleep and academic performance. Journal of Personality, 70, 177–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, E. C., & Graziano, W. G. (2003). Self-esteem, personality and achievement in high school: A prospective longitudinal study in Texas. Journal of Personality, 71, 971–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Straight, C. A., & Stephenson, C. L. (2011). Beliefs about cognitive gender differences: Accurate for direction, underestimated for size. Sex Roles, 64, 336–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. A. (2004). Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 913–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, P. A. (2001). Addressing cultural complexities in practice: A framework for clinicians and counselors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. J., Wood, D., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Harms, P. D., & Roberts, B. W. (2010). What do conscientiousness people do? Development and validation of the behavioral indicators of conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 501–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. E., Richeson, J. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). Middle class and marginal? Socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 838–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B., & McKay, R. (2013). Searching for tomorrow’s innovators: Profiling creative adolescents. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B., & Vuyk, M. A. (2013). Career development for creatively gifted students: What parents, teachers, and counselors need to know. In Creatively gifted students are not like other gifted students (pp. 137–151). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Brill Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B. A. (1997). Smart girls: A new psychology of girls, women, and giftedness. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B. A., & McKay, R. (2014). Smart girls in the 21st century: Understanding talented girls and women. Tuscon, AZ: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B. A., Multon, K. D., Syme, M. L., Fry, N. M., Owens, R., Hammond, M., & Robinson-Kurpius, S. (2012). Development of the distance from privilege measures: A tool for understanding the persistence of talented women in STEM. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., & Hull, M. F. (2012). Creative personality and anticreative environment for high school dropouts. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2007). A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) and undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) for graduate student academic performance. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6, 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limont, W., Dreszer-Drogorób, J., Bedyńska, S., Śliwińska, K., & Jastrzębska, D. (2014). ‘Old wine in new bottles’? Relationships between overexcitabilities, the big five personality traits and giftedness in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., et al. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693–2698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2003). Demographic and personality predictors of intelligence: A study using the NEO personality inventory and the Myers–Briggs type indicator. European Journal of Personality, 17, 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2006). What facets of openness and conscientiousness predict fluid intelligence score? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Paltiel, L. (2004). Why is conscientiousness negatively correlated with intelligence? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1013–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Paltiel, L. (2005). Can personality factors predict intelligence? Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1021–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP, 2018). https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/

  • Noble, K. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1999). To thine own self be true: A new model of female talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. C., & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Corwith, S. (2018). Poverty, academic achievement, and giftedness: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrove, J. M., & Long, S. M. (2007). Social class and belonging: Implications for college adjustment. The Review of Higher Education, 30, 363–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research (Vol. 1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera, H. N., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Vocational interest profiles: Profile replicability and relations with the STEM major choice and the big-five. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., Wood, D., & Smith, J. L. (2005). Evaluating five factor theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 166–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. J. (2002). The relationship between extraversion and ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 517–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, J. M. (2004). College performance predictions and the SAT. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saklofske, D. H., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (1995). International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. (1980). On educating the gifted. Educational Researcher, 9(3), 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). A proposed direction forward for gifted education based on psychological science. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Kaufman, S. B., & Smillie, L. D. (2018). Unique associations between big five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well-being. Journal of Personality, 86, 158–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, S., Baghurst, P., Vimpani, G., & McMichael, A. (2007). Socioeconomic position, maternal IQ, home environment, and cognitive development. The Journal of Pediatrics, 151(3), 284–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedel, A., & Poropat, A. E. (2017). Personality and academic performance. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. D. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–9). Neria, Yuval: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1174–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuyk, M. A., Kerr, B. A., & Krieshok, T. S. (2016). From overexcitabilities to openness: Informing gifted education with psychological science. Gifted and Talented International, 31, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warne, R. T. (2016). Five reasons to put the g back into giftedness: An argument for applying the Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory of intelligence to gifted education research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2018). Talent development: A path towards eminence. In S. I. Pfeiffer et al. (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 247–258). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 581–610). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., & Shani-Zinovich, I. (2011). Do academically gifted and nongifted students differ on the big-five and adaptive status? Some recent data and conclusions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 566–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA

    Barbara A. Kerr, Jonathan D. Wright, Jonathan M. Huffman, Maxwell Birdnow, Miriam Reder, Olivia A. Stull & Robyn N. Malmsten

Authors
  1. Barbara A. Kerr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan D. Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan M. Huffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maxwell Birdnow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Miriam Reder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Olivia A. Stull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Robyn N. Malmsten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Robert J. Sternberg

  2. Department of Graduate Education, Rider University, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA

    Don Ambrose

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kerr, B.A. et al. (2021). Cognitive Ability, Personality, and Privilege: A Trait-Complex Approach to Talent Development. In: Sternberg, R.J., Ambrose, D. (eds) Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation