Skip to main content

Cosmetic Dermatology and the Ethics of Enhancement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dermatoethics
  • 472 Accesses

Abstract

Cosmetic dermatology is a subspecialty that encompasses procedures and treatments intended to enhance patients’ ideal aesthetic. It poses unique challenges for physicians, forced to step out of the typical physician role of restoring and protecting health and into the role of bringing the body towards a subjective preference of beauty and youth. Cosmetic dermatologists are at risk of promoting arbitrary and false ideals of beauty. However, refusal to treat may violate the patient’s rights of autonomy and beneficence. Cosmetic enhancements have several benefits for the patient that go beyond aesthetic satisfaction, and if provided ethically, can make a positive contribution to the patient and potentially to society at large. This chapter discusses the unique ethical considerations that arise in cosmetic dermatology and how dermatologists should navigate them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Imadojemu S, Fiester AM. Are there moral obligations to cosmetic dermatology patients beyond informed consent? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:136–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Imadojemu S, Fiester A. Skin bleaching as dermatologic intervention. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:901–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Auquino YSJ. Big eye surgery: the ethics of medicalizing Asian features. Theor Med Bioth. 2017;38:213–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hersch J. Profiling the new immigrant worker: the effects of skin color and height. J Labor Econ. 2014;26:345–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ladizinski B, Mistry N, Kundu RV. Widespread use of toxic skin lightening compounds: medical and psychosocial aspects. Dermatol Clin. 2011;29:111–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cantor JD. Cosmetic surgery: when fifty doesn’t feel fabulous. Virtual Mentor. 2007;9:410–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strauss RP, Resnick SD. Pulsed dye laser therapy for port-wine stains in children: psychosocial and ethical issues. Pediatrics. 1993;122:505–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelly JB, Makkar HS. Ethics in pediatric dermatology. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30:471–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alegre-Sanchez A, Perez-Garcia B, Boixeda P. Pulsed-dye laser treatment of port-wine stains in children: useful tips to avoid general anesthesia. Pediatr Dermatol. 2017;34:619–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Del Rio A, Rinaldi R, Napoletano S, di Luca NM. Cosmetic surgery for children and adolescence. Deontological and bioethical remarks. Clin Ter. 2017;168:e415–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabin, JE. Amendment to E-2.2.a, “pediatric decision making.” opinion of the council on ethical and judicial affairs. Opinion, Ethical and Judical Affairs. https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019-05/a19-ceja-op1.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2020.

  12. McClean K, Hanke CW. The medical necessity for treatment of port-wine stains. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:663–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. American Society for Dermatologic Surgery. Skin cancer, cosmetic procedure and patient demographic trends revealed. www.asds.net/Skin-Experts/News-Room/Press-Releases/ASDS-Members-Performed-Nearly-12-Million-Treatments-In-2017. Accessed 1 Jan 2020.

  14. Nielson CB, Harb JN, Motaparthi K. Education in cosmetic procedural dermatology: resident experiences and perceptions. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019;12:E70–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Callahan D. The goals of medicine. Setting new priorities. Hast Cent Rep. 1996;26:S1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Saade DS, de Castro Maymone MB, Vashi NA. The ethics of the cosmetic consult: performing procedures on the body dysmorphic patient. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018;4:185–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Konda S, Kathrotiya P, Grant-Kels JM. The blind patient and the cosmetic dermatology consultation: who defines beauty? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:769–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamermesh DS, Biddle JE. Beauty and the labor market. Am Econ Rev. 1994;84:1174–94.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ogbogu P, Fleischer A, Brodell R, Bhalla G, Draelos Z, Feldman S. Physicians’ and patients’ perspectives on office-based dispensing. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:151–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. American Medical Association. Opinion 8.063. Sale of health-related products from physicians’ offices. Code of Medical Ethics. Available at: https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ama-code-medical-ethics-opinions-sale-and-dispensing-health-related-products/2010-12. Accessed 21 Nov 2019.

  22. American Academy of Dermatology Position Statement on Dispensing. September 26, 1999. https://server.aad.org/Forms/Policies/Uploads/PS/PS-Dispensing.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2019.

  23. Miller RC. Dermatologists should guard their patients’ purse not pick their pockets. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:255–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gold MH. Dispensing cosmeceuticals from the office. Virtual Mentor. 2006;8:503–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Castanedo-Tardan MP, Baumann L. Ethics of selling skin care. Clin Dermatol. 2009;27:355–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rongioletti F, Atzori L, Ferreli C, Pau M, et al. Granulomatous reactions after injections of multiple aesthetic micro-implants in temporal combinations: a complication of filler addiction. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:1188–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin CH, Chiang CP, Wu BY, Gao HW. Filler migration to the forehead due to multiple filler injections in a patient addicted to cosmetic filler. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017;19:124–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Charrow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kwak, R., Charrow, A. (2021). Cosmetic Dermatology and the Ethics of Enhancement. In: Bercovitch, L., Perlis, C.S., Stoff, B.K., Grant-Kels, J.M. (eds) Dermatoethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56861-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56861-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56860-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56861-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics