Abstract
An online survey of 654 Australians found that the NP seniors is associated with positive personal characteristics of health and well-being such as ‘like to travel’, ‘lead an involved and active life’, ‘are vibrant and full of purpose’. Older people is also associated with positive characteristics, but somewhat less so than seniors and more socially (other) oriented. Older people are seen to ‘benefit the workforce through their experience’, ‘have wisdom and can always be turned to for advice’, ‘play an important role in their extended family’s life’. By contrast, the characteristics of those typically referred to by the elderly are negative in that the referents are incompetent or impose a burden on society, cf. ‘are frail and fall more often’, ‘are often victims of mental and physical abuse’, ‘are unable to look after themselves and depend on others for help’. The referents of old people and oldies have no particular set of characteristics assigned to them; perhaps that is why they only figure in the one (negative) characteristic ‘are tight-fisted with money’ that itself is not strongly associated with any one of the five NPs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This research was supported under Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme, project number DP 140102058.
- 2.
There is a flourishing of recent acronyms referring to active and affluent older persons: GOFER “genial old fart enjoying retirement”; GLAM “greying, leisured, affluent, married”; WOOP “well off older person”; WOOF “well off older folk”. Perhaps most popular is SKI “spending the kids’ inheritance” (e.g. the SKI Club claims ‘we are all about “Spending the Kids Inheritance”, and having a great time before that inevitable day comes’ (http:// http://www.skiclubaustralia.com.au/about-the-ski-club/)
- 3.
The term successful ageing entered the gerontological literature (and general academic debate) in about 1987 (Rowe & Kahn, 1987), to denote the idea that an ever-increasing number of older people were leading an active and healthy lifestyle and were still contributing to society.
- 4.
On the use here of ‘typical’ instead of ‘stereotypical’, see the discussion in §1 where we say that meaning is ‘a minimum set of stereotypical facts about the typical denotatum’.
References
Allan, K. (2001). Natural language semantics. Oxford, UK/Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Allan, K. (2006). Stereotype semantics. In E. K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of languages and linguistics (Vol. 14, 2nd ed.) (pp. 153–155). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Allan, K. (2011). Graded salience: Probabilistic meanings in the lexicon. In K. M. Jaszczolt & K. Allan (Eds.), Salience and defaults in utterance processing (pp. 165–187). Berlin, Germany/Boston, MA: De Gruyter.
Allan, K. (2013). Referring to 'what counts as the referent': a view from linguistics. In A. Capone, F. L. Piparo, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics (pp. 263–284). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_10
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80(1): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027577.
Fillmore, C. J. (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. Cogen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 123–131). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Labov, W. (1978). Denotational structure. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen, & K. W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon (pp. 220–260). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1987). Human aging: Usual and successful. Science, 237(4811), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3299702
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allan, K., Benczes, R., Burridge, K. (2021). Seniors, Older People, the Elderly, Oldies, and Old People: What Language Reveals about Stereotypes of Ageing in Australia. In: Macagno, F., Capone, A. (eds) Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56696-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56696-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56695-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56696-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)