Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Evidence and Commissions in the Dynamics of German and Swedish Pension Markets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dynamics of Welfare Markets

Part of the book series: Work and Welfare in Europe ((RECOWE))

  • 357 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates the policy dynamics of pension markets in Germany and Sweden, introduced in both countries in the early 2000s. While the origins and politics of these markets are well-studied, less is known about their re-regulation. A policy conversion occurred in Sweden, where lifecycle funds increased the social protection function of the premium pension. In Germany, layering led to new private pension schemes to cover self-employed and saving for home ownership, but policies also drifted as shortcomings were neglected. The politics behind re-regulation reveal stronger continuities in Sweden due to more technocratic and evidence-based policy-making, while in Germany problems were largely ignored. Comparative differences are traced to variations in the availability of data, government commissions and partisan interests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AltEinkG (2004). Gesetz zur Neuordnung der einkommensteuerrechtlichen Behandlung von Altersvorsorgeaufwendungen und Altersbezügen (Alterseinkünftegesetz - AltEinkG). Bundesgesetzblatt Teil I, 33, 1427–1447.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARD. (2011). Fall AWD: Die Chronologie. https://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/Fall-AWD-Die-Chronologie,awd157.html. Accessed 15 May 2019.

  • Berner, F. (2011). New Private Pensions in Germany: A Pension Maret or a Branch of the Welfare State? Contested Regulatory Issues. In L. Leisering (Ed.), The New Regulatory State. Regulating Pensions in Germany and the UK (pp. 127–149). Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, F. (2011). Die Riester-Rente – Überblick zum Stand der Forschung und sozialpolitische Bewertung nach zehn Jahren. Sozialer Fortschritt, 60(6), 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, F. (2016). Einstieg in den Ausstieg? – Die Entwicklung der Förderung der „Riester-Rente‟. Sozialer Fortschritt, 65(4), 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMAS. (2018). Rentenversicherungsbericht 2018. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMVBS (Ed.). (2013). Das Wohneigentum in der Riester-Förderung – Empirie und Reformoptionen der Eigenheimrente. BMVBS-Online-Publikation 20/2013. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, I., & Wilke, F. (2014). Private Vorsorge als Illusion. Rationalitätsprobleme des neuen deutschen Rentenmodells. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. (2003). Two Worlds of Pension Reform in Western Europe. Comparative Politics, 35(4), 399–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. (2015). The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronqvist, H., & Thaler, R. H. (2004). Design Choices in Privatized Social-Security Systems: Learning from the Swedish Experience. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 424–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dir. (2018:57). Ett upphandlat fondtorg för premiepension. Stockholm: Regeringen.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRV, Deutsche Rentenversicherung. (2009). Statistiken – Versicherte – Zeitreihen. forschung.deutsche-rentenversicherung.de. Accessed 17 July 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ds. (1992:89). Ett reformerat pensionssystem – Bakgrund, principer ock skiss. Promemoria av Pensionsarbetsgruppen. Stockholm: Allmänna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, B., Gronwald, M., & Wiß, T. (2011). Germany: Departing from Bismarckian Public Pensions. In B. Ebbinghaus (Ed.), The Varieties of Pension Governance. Pension Privatization in Europe (pp. 119–150). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein, T. (2013). Learning to Depart from a Policy Path: Institutional Change and the Reform of German Labour Market Policy. Government and Opposition, 48(1), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • GDV, Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft (Ed.). (2009). Statistisches Taschenbuch der Versicherungswirtschaft 2009. Berlin: GDV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, K., & Reisch, L. A. (2010). Riesterrente: Politik ohne Marktbeobachtung. Wochenbericht des DIW, 77(8), 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W. (2008). Three Lenses of Evidence-Based Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C. (1993). The Hidden Side of the American Welfare State. Political Science Quarterly, 108(3), 403–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2012). Public Policy. A New Introduction. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Köppe, S. (2015). Wohlfahrtsmärkte. Die Privatisierung von Bildung und Rente in Deutschland, Schweden und den USA. Frankfurt/M: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köppe, S., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2019). Public Service Integration in Hard Times: Merging Unemployment Benefit and Labour Activation Measures. Administration, 67(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisering, L. (Ed.). (2011). The New Regulatory State. Regulating Pensions in Germany and the UK. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindén, T. S. (2013). Pension Policy Recommendations of Governmental Commissions in Norway, Denmark, Germany and the UK. In R. Ervik & T. S. Lindén (Eds.), The Making of Ageing Policy. Theory and Practice in Europe (pp. 98–123). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindvall, J., & Rothstein, B. (2006). Sweden: The Fall of the Strong State. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loxbo, K. (2007). Bakom socialdemokraternas beslut. En studie av den politiska förändringens dilemman – från 1950-talets ATP-strid till 1990-talets pensionsuppgörelse. Växjö: Växjö University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loxbo, K. (2008, August). Behind Closed Doors. Why the Swedish Pension Reform Was Successful. Ratio Conference 2008, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marier, P. (2008). Empowering Epistemic Communities: Specialised Politicians, Policy Experts and Policy Reform. West European Politics, 31(3), 513–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marier, P. (2009). The Power of Institutionalized Learning: The Uses and Practices of Commissions to Generate Policy Change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1204–1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palme, J. (2003). Pension Reform in Sweden and the Changing Boundaries between Public and Private. In G. L. Clark & N. Whiteside (Eds.), Pension Security in the 21st Century. Redrawing the Public-Private Debate (pp. 144–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palme, M., Sundén, A., & Söderlind, P. (2007). How Do Individual Accounts Work in the Swedish Pension System? Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(2–3), 636–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • PM. (2019). Lista alla fonder. In Pensionsmyndigheten. Stockholm: Pensionsmyndigheten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop. (1997/98:151). Inkomstgrundad ålderspension, m. m. Stockholm: Regeringen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop. (1999/2000:12). Statlig förvaltning av premiepensionsmedel, m. m. Stockholm: Regeringen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop. (2008/09:202). Pensionsmyndigheten och dess verksamhet. Stockholm: Regeringen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop. (2009/10:44). Ändringar i premiepensionssystemet. Stockholm: Regeringen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop. (2013/14:71). Telefonförsäljning på premiepensionsområdet. Stockholm: Regeringen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop. (2017/18:247). Ett tryggt och mer hållbart premiepensionssystem. Stockholm: Regeringen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radha, J., & Camasso, M. J. (2013). Protecting Children in the Age of Outrage: A New Perspective on Child Protective Services Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieckhoff, C. (2011). Wohin steuert die Riester-Rente? – Stand der Forschung, Kritik der Ergebnisse und zukünftiger Forschungsbedarf. Deutsche Rentenversicherung, 65(1), 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, I., & Jochem, S. (2007). Germany: Beyond Policy Gridlock. In E. M. Immergut, K. M. Anderson, & I. Schulze (Eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics: Political Institutions and Policy Outcomes in Comparative Perspective (pp. 660–710). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Haux, T. (2017). Evidence-Based Policy-Making (EBPM). In B. Greve (Ed.), Handbook of Social Policy Evaluation (pp. 141–160). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • SOU (1994:20). Reformerat pensionssystem. Stockholm: Fritzes.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOU (2005:87). Svårnavigerat? Premiepensionssparande på rätt kurs. Stockholm: Fritzes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundén, A. (2006). The Swedish Experience with Pension Reform. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SVT. (2017). Allra-skandalen – detta har hänt. https://www.svt.se/nyheter/ekonomi/allra-skandalen-detta-har-hant. Accessed 15 May 2019.

  • Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save More Tomorrow (TM): Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1, part 2), S164–S187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. K. (2005). Design and Implementation Issues in Swedish Individual Pension Accounts. Social Security Bulletin, 65(4), 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Stephan Köppe

Authors
  1. Stephan Köppe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Köppe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nantes, Nantes, France

    Clémence Ledoux

  2. University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Karen Shire

  3. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Franca van Hooren

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Köppe, S. (2021). The Role of Evidence and Commissions in the Dynamics of German and Swedish Pension Markets. In: Ledoux, C., Shire, K., van Hooren, F. (eds) The Dynamics of Welfare Markets. Work and Welfare in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56623-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56623-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56622-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56623-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation