Abstract
At first glance, transhumanism may seem to be a proper framework for interpreting technological advancement, because of its positive attitude towards innovation, and especially when opposed to “technophobic” movements. Nevertheless, in the first part of this chapter it is demonstrated how the transhumanist premises are wrong, and how the movement itself represents, just as much as technophobic approaches, an extreme derivative of the Modern Western tradition. Specifically, the criticism is focused on the propensity of transhumanism to read the technological otherness from a utilitarian perspective, as a way to emancipate our species from the realm of nature. Instead, the aim of the second part is to offer a radical revision of the traditionally dichotomous relationship between “nature” and “culture”, from which the transhumanist positions stem. In doing so, the chapter draws on different and more ontologically inclusive conceptual perspectives, namely the ones on which critical posthumanism is grounded. As a result, technology comes to play a new active role in the process of “shaping the human”. Eventually, rather than being just a tool at our disposal, technology and technique are read as being a “species peculiar” pillar, and thus part of our very nature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bergson, H.: Creative Evolution. Mitchell, A. (Trans.). Dover, New York (1998) [1911]
Carli, E. (ed.): Cervelli che parlano. Il dibattito su mente, coscienza e intelligenza. Paravia Bruno Mondadori Editori, Milano (2000)
Cassirer, E.: Form and technology. In: Hoel, A.S., Folkvord, I. (eds.) Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology: Contemporary Readings, pp. 15–53. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012)
Damasio, A.: Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. Penguin Books, New York (2005)
Dennett, D.: Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Evolution and the Meaning of Life. Simon & Schuster, New York (1995)
Dolphijn, R., van der Tuin, I.: Pushing dualism to an extreme: on the philosophical impetus of a New materialism. Cont. Philos. Rev. 44(4), 383–400 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416673660
Edelman, G.: La mente, una prospettiva evoluzionista. In: Carli, E. (ed.) Cervelli che parlano. Il dibattito su mente, coscienza e intelligenza. Paravia Bruno Mondadori Editori, Milano (2000)
Galimberti, U.: Psiche e techne. l’uomo nell’età della tecnica. Feltrinelli, Milano (1999)
Hoel, A.S., Van der Tuin, I.: The ontological force of technicity: reading Cassirer and Simondon diffractively. Philos. Technol. 26, 187–202 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-012-0092-5
Ihde, D., Malafouris, L.: Homo faber revisited: postphenomenology and material engagement theory. Philos. Technol. 2018, 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7
Ingold, T.: Eight themes in the anthropology of technology. Soc. Anal. 41(1), 106–138 (1997)
Ito, J.: Why westerners fear the robots and the Japanese do not. https://www.wired.com/story/ideas-joi-ito-robot-overlords/ (2018)
Kiberd, R.: Burn it all down: a guide to neo-luddism. https://gizmodo.com/the-many-faces-ofneo-luddism-1682139778 (2015)
Kurzweil, R.: Promise and peril. http://www.kurzweilai.net/promise-and-peril (2001)
Leghissa, G.: Ospiti di un mondo di cose. Per un rapporto postumano con la materialità. Aut. Aut. 361, 10–33 (2014)
Marchesini, R.: Post-human. Verso nuovi modelli di esistenza. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino (2009)
Merkle, R.: Uploading. In: More, M., Vita-More, N. (eds.) The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, pp. 157–164. Wiley, Chichester (2013)
Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phenomenology of Perception. Smith, C. (Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1962)
Moravec, H.: Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1988)
More, M.: The philosophy of transhumanism. In: More, M., Vita-More, N. (eds.) The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, pp. 3–17. Wiley, Chichester (2013)
Parisi, D.: Mente. I nuovi modelli della vita artificiale. Il Mulino, Bologna (1999)
Ronchi, R.: Figure del postumano. Gli zombie, l’onkos e il rovescio del Dasein. Aut. Aut. 361, 82–96 (2014)
Simondon, G.: On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Mellamphy, N. (Trans.). University of Western Ontario, http://dephasage.ocular-witness.com/pdf/SimondonGilbert.OnTheModeOfExistence.pdf (1980)
Stiegler, B.: Technics and Time 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1998)
Van der Veken, J.: Merleau-Ponty and Whitehead on the concept of nature. Interchange. 31(2&3), 319–334 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026764822238
Whitehead, A.: Process and Reality, Corrected edn. Free Press, New York (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Papagni, G. (2021). Transhumanism and Philosophy of Technology. In: Hofkirchner, W., Kreowski, HJ. (eds) Transhumanism: The Proper Guide to a Posthuman Condition or a Dangerous Idea?. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56546-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56546-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56545-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56546-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)