Skip to main content

Sustainable Consumption and Production: Mapping the Conceptual Terrain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Consumption and Production, Volume I
  • 718 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter maps the genealogy and meaning of the concept of sustainable consumption and production (SCP). It examines the complexity related to its definitional exactitude, policy measurability, targets and indicators, and the gap between intent and outcomes. It delineates the development–environment conundrum and the important steps taken by the international community to reconcile the two, leading to the adoption of the framework of sustainable development. It argues that ethical and moral motivations can bring about behavioural changes towards responsible consumption and production practices. This entails foregrounding ethics of sustainability in addition to invoking the harm principle which applies to both the concerns of environment and development, and promises to contribute to building robust pathways for achieving SCP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. (1989). What is ecological economics? Ecological Economics, 1(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, P., Simon, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., & De Groot, R. (2003). A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics, 44, 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1984a). Harm to others: The moral limits of the criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1984b). Environmental pollution & the threshold of harm. The Hastings Center Report, 14(3), 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2010). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, R. (1995). The concept of environmental sustainability. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, T. (2006). Global justice and the distribution of natural resources. Political Studies, 54, 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowy, M., & Betto, F. (2015). Values of a new civilization. In W. F. Fisher & T. Ponniah (Eds.), Another world is possible: World social forum proposals for an alternative globalisation (pp. 329–337). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1909/2009). On liberty. Auckland: Floating Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T. (1988). The politics of sustainability. In R. K. Turner (Ed.), Sustainable environmental management: Principles and practices (pp. 29–50). London: Bellhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelenc, J., Ballet, J., & Dedeurwaerder, T. (2015). Weak sustainability versus strong sustainability. Brief for GSDR. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6569122-Pelenc-Weak%20Sustainability%20versus%20Strong%20Sustainability.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2020.

  • Pogge, T. (2005). Real world justice. The Journal of Ethics, 9(1/2), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, H., Roser, M.,  Mispy, J., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2018). Measuring progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. SDG-Tracker.org. Accessed 5 Apr 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamat, M. R. (2016). Ethics of sustainable development: The moral imperative for the effective implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Natural Resources Forum, 40, 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000229025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapcott, R. (2010). International ethics: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2015). Living democracy movement: Alternatives to the bankruptcy of globalization. In W. F. Fisher & T. Ponniah (Eds.), Another world is possible: World social forum proposals for an alternative globalisation (pp. 115–124). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, J. (2011). Norm’ of sustainable development: Predicament and the problematique. India Quarterly, 67(2), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2019). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (n.d.). Sustainable consumption and production. Sustainable development goals knowledge platform. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/sustainableconsumptionandproduction. Accessed on 22 Oct 2020.

  • UN ECOSOC. (2019, May 8). Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals: Report of the Secretary-General. E/2019/68.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCHE. (1972a). Stockholm Declaration on Human Environment. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CONF.48/14/REV.1. Accessed 15 Apr 2020.

  • UNCHE. (1972b, June 14). Indira Gandhi’s address to the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment Stockholm. https://www.inc.in/en/media/speech/the-human-environment. Accessed 4 May 2020.

  • UNDP-OPHI. (2019). Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (2019): Illuminating Poverty. United Nations Development Programme and Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/mpi_2019_publication.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2020.

  • UNEP. (2011). Paving the way for sustainable consumption and production: The Marrakesh Process Progress Report, Towards a 10 Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/947Paving_the_way_final.pdf.

  • UNEP. (2015, June). Sustainable consumption and production: A handbook for policymakers, UNEP. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1951Sustainable%20Consumption.pdf. Accessed 6 May 2020.

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987, August 4). Our common future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Official Record of the UNGA, A/42/427.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayati Srivastava .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Srivastava, J. (2021). Sustainable Consumption and Production: Mapping the Conceptual Terrain. In: Bali Swain, R., Sweet, S. (eds) Sustainable Consumption and Production, Volume I. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56371-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56371-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56370-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56371-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics