Skip to main content

Public Wealth Management and Distribution in the Extractive Industry in Nigeria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sovereign Wealth Funds, Local Content Policies and CSR

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 596 Accesses

Abstract

Few issues surrounding public wealth management in Nigeria enjoy broad geo-political agreement and support. The most vexed question is that of which level of government ought to have control over extractive resources. Behind the resource control debates is the question of the appropriate resource revenue sharing formula the country ought to adopt. Under current arrangements, states receive 13% of the revenues generated from natural resources located within their territory, leaving the federal government with control of 87% of the country’s resource wealth. Agitations by oil-producing states for state resource ownership and control have been raging for decades but have not resulted in any change in resource ownership and control. Although the federal legislature has the constitutional authority to change the current sharing formula to give states more share than they currently have, it has not yet exercised that authority. In order to ensure that extractive companies pay adequate revenue to the state, the government imposes an assortment of fiscal instruments, including: royalties, petroleum profits tax, capital gains tax and value-added tax. In order to ensure that revenues generated from the resources benefit both present and future generations, the country operates a sovereign wealth fund. The operation of this fund has been riddled in managerial controversy, even its constitutionality has boggled the minds of Nigerian legal pundits. This chapter analyses these issues, proffering views on how they may be better understood and approached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Oil was officially discovered in commercial quantities in 1956 while commercial mining of tin ore began as far back as 1904, and coal was discovered in commercial quantities in 1909. By 1919, the Nigerian Geological Survey was already established.

  2. 2.

    The 1999 Constitution recognises the distinct standing of the federal capital territory in the distribution of resource revenue.

  3. 3.

    1999 Constitution, section 162(2).

  4. 4.

    1999 Constitution, section 162(5)–(8).

  5. 5.

    1999 Constitution, section 162(5)–(8).

  6. 6.

    Shell v Federal Board of Inland Revenue, (1996) NWLR (Pt 466) 285.

  7. 7.

    Niger Delta Development Commission (Establishment) Act, 2000, section 14(2)(b).

  8. 8.

    The index assessed how 81 resource-rich countries governed their extractive resources (oil, gas and minerals).

  9. 9.

    The others were Ecuador and Iraq. Most observers believe that Nigeria joined the league of countries with SWFs only with the enactment of the NSIA Act. This belief, however, ignores the fact that the ECA was in itself a type of SWF, and despite its legal problems and management deficiencies it continued to exist de facto as such.

  10. 10.

    NSIA Act, s 4(2).

  11. 11.

    NSIA Act, s 7.

  12. 12.

    NSIA Act, s 31.

  13. 13.

    NSIA Act, s 39(2).

  14. 14.

    NSIA Act, s 41(1).

  15. 15.

    NSIA Act, s 35.

  16. 16.

    NSIA Act, s 48.

  17. 17.

    Whether money from the Federation Account is first paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the state before a portion of it is transferred by the state to the agreed SWF, or that portion of the money is transferred directly from the Federation Account to the SWF, makes no difference provided that the transfer is backed by a law of the state legislature.

  18. 18.

    Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution.

  19. 19.

    Section 318(1) pf the 1999 Constitution.

  20. 20.

    It must be pointed out that outside the definition of “Federation” provided in the Constitution, the multiple contexts in which the Constitutional draftsperson uses the term that makes it unclear whether it is referring to the federal government or to the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

  21. 21.

    NSIA Act, s 47(2).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chilenye Nwapi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nwapi, C. (2021). Public Wealth Management and Distribution in the Extractive Industry in Nigeria. In: Pereira, E.G., Spencer, R., Moses, J.W. (eds) Sovereign Wealth Funds, Local Content Policies and CSR. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56092-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics