Abstract
The growth of entrepreneurship literature spurred a discussion on the distinct characteristics of the different types of entrepreneurship, with most attention being given to market, social, and political entrepreneurship. In organizing the inquiry around these supposedly distinct types of entrepreneurship, scholars tend to focus on the goals entrepreneurs pursue: market entrepreneurs are portrayed as driven by profit, political entrepreneurs are driven by rents, and social entrepreneurs are thought to be driven by other, supposedly less venal, motivations. This paper presents the shortcomings of this ends-oriented taxonomy and offers an alternative approach for organizing inquiry, one that originates from Richard Wagner’s framework of Entangled Political Economy and his distinction between voluntary and involuntary investors. I argue that instead of focusing on the ends, the taxonomy of entrepreneurship should focus on the means, in particular, on whether the resources that support the venture were obtained through cooperation or coercion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bacigalupe, G., & Cámara, M. (2012). Transnational families and social technologies: Reassessing immigration psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1425–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.698211.
Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.
Cantillon, R. (2015). Essay on the nature of trade in general. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Totowa: Barnes and Noble Books.
Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we Don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.3.37.
Elkjaer, J. R. (1991). The entrepreneur in economic theory. An example of the development and influence of a concept. Hist Eur Ideas, 13(6), 805–815.
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment: A new approach to the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed Women’s employment, education, and family. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 1–21.
Greenwood, J., Seshadri, A., & Yorukoglu, M. (2005). Engines of Liberation. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00326.
Harper, D. A. (1996). Entrepreneurship and the market process: An enquiry into the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge.
Hayek, F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, 4(13), 33–54.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.
Horwitz, S. (2015). Hayek’s modern family: Classical liberalism and the evolution of social institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2010.1.
Knight, F. H. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Mineola: Dover Publications.
Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.
Kuchař, P. (2016). Entrepreneurship and institutional change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26(2), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0433-5.
Lachmann, L. (2008). The market economy and the distribution of wealth. In M. Sennholz (Ed.), On freedom and free Enterprise: Essays in honor of Ludwig Von Mises (pp. 175–187). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Leeson, P. T., & Boettke, P. J. (2009). Two-tiered entrepreneurship and economic development. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(3), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.02.005.
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.
Mises, L. V. (1981). Socialism: An economic and sociological analysis. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Moskowitz, E. (2017). The education of Eva Moskowitz: A memoir. New York: HarperCollins.
Podemska-Mikluch, M. (2018). Contraception without romance: The entangled political economy of state and Federal Contraceptive Insurance Mandates. In R. E. Wagner (Ed.), James M Buchanan: A theorist of political economy and social philosophy (pp. 263–290). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_13.
Podemska-Mikluch, M. (2019). Entrepreneurship. In A. Marciano & G. B. Ramello (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics. New York: Springer.
Podemska-Mikluch, M., & Wagner, R. E. (2013). Dyads, triads, and the theory of exchange: Between liberty and coercion. The Review of Austrian Economics, 26, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-012-0180-x.
Resnick, M. (1997). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. The American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737–747.
Schreiner, M. (2003). A cost-effectiveness analysis of the Grameen bank of Bangladesh. Development and Policy Review, 21(3), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00215.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2008). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: Routledge.
Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics and economics: A critique of economic doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stone, B. (2017). The upstarts: How uber, Airbnb, and the killer companies of the new Silicon Valley are changing the world. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Economic Inquiry, 5(3), 224–232.
Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Adv Entrep Firm Emergence Growth, 3, 119–138.
Wagner, R. E. (2009). Property, state, and entangled political economy. In W. Schafer, A. Schneider, & T. Thomas (Eds.), Markets and politics: Insights from a political economy perspective (pp. 37–49). Marburg: Metropolis.
Wagner, R. E. (2016). Politics as a peculiar business: Public choice in a system of entangled political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Podemska-Mikluch, M. (2021). Taxonomy of Entrepreneurship – A Means-Oriented Approach. In: Hebert, D.J., Thomas, D.W. (eds) Emergence, Entanglement, and Political Economy. Studies in Public Choice, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56088-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56088-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56087-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56088-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)