Skip to main content

Taxonomy of Entrepreneurship – A Means-Oriented Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emergence, Entanglement, and Political Economy

Part of the book series: Studies in Public Choice ((SIPC,volume 38))

Abstract

The growth of entrepreneurship literature spurred a discussion on the distinct characteristics of the different types of entrepreneurship, with most attention being given to market, social, and political entrepreneurship. In organizing the inquiry around these supposedly distinct types of entrepreneurship, scholars tend to focus on the goals entrepreneurs pursue: market entrepreneurs are portrayed as driven by profit, political entrepreneurs are driven by rents, and social entrepreneurs are thought to be driven by other, supposedly less venal, motivations. This paper presents the shortcomings of this ends-oriented taxonomy and offers an alternative approach for organizing inquiry, one that originates from Richard Wagner’s framework of Entangled Political Economy and his distinction between voluntary and involuntary investors. I argue that instead of focusing on the ends, the taxonomy of entrepreneurship should focus on the means, in particular, on whether the resources that support the venture were obtained through cooperation or coercion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bacigalupe, G., & Cámara, M. (2012). Transnational families and social technologies: Reassessing immigration psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1425–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.698211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, R. (2015). Essay on the nature of trade in general. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Totowa: Barnes and Noble Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we Don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.3.37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkjaer, J. R. (1991). The entrepreneur in economic theory. An example of the development and influence of a concept. Hist Eur Ideas, 13(6), 805–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment: A new approach to the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed Women’s employment, education, and family. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J., Seshadri, A., & Yorukoglu, M. (2005). Engines of Liberation. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. A. (1996). Entrepreneurship and the market process: An enquiry into the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, 4(13), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, S. (2015). Hayek’s modern family: Classical liberalism and the evolution of social institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/emr.2010.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Mineola: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. The American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchař, P. (2016). Entrepreneurship and institutional change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26(2), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0433-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L. (2008). The market economy and the distribution of wealth. In M. Sennholz (Ed.), On freedom and free Enterprise: Essays in honor of Ludwig Von Mises (pp. 175–187). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T., & Boettke, P. J. (2009). Two-tiered entrepreneurship and economic development. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(3), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. V. (1981). Socialism: An economic and sociological analysis. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, E. (2017). The education of Eva Moskowitz: A memoir. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podemska-Mikluch, M. (2018). Contraception without romance: The entangled political economy of state and Federal Contraceptive Insurance Mandates. In R. E. Wagner (Ed.), James M Buchanan: A theorist of political economy and social philosophy (pp. 263–290). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Podemska-Mikluch, M. (2019). Entrepreneurship. In A. Marciano & G. B. Ramello (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podemska-Mikluch, M., & Wagner, R. E. (2013). Dyads, triads, and the theory of exchange: Between liberty and coercion. The Review of Austrian Economics, 26, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-012-0180-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. (1997). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. The American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, M. (2003). A cost-effectiveness analysis of the Grameen bank of Bangladesh. Development and Policy Review, 21(3), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2008). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics and economics: A critique of economic doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, B. (2017). The upstarts: How uber, Airbnb, and the killer companies of the new Silicon Valley are changing the world. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Economic Inquiry, 5(3), 224–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Adv Entrep Firm Emergence Growth, 3, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2009). Property, state, and entangled political economy. In W. Schafer, A. Schneider, & T. Thomas (Eds.), Markets and politics: Insights from a political economy perspective (pp. 37–49). Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2016). Politics as a peculiar business: Public choice in a system of entangled political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Podemska-Mikluch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Podemska-Mikluch, M. (2021). Taxonomy of Entrepreneurship – A Means-Oriented Approach. In: Hebert, D.J., Thomas, D.W. (eds) Emergence, Entanglement, and Political Economy. Studies in Public Choice, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56088-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics