Skip to main content

Biobanking for Biomarker Discovery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biobanking of Human Biospecimens
  • 432 Accesses

Abstract

The implementation of personalized or precision medicine involves developing therapeutic agents to fit a patient’s molecular profile. Biomarkers are defined as “any characteristic that can be objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological response to a therapeutic intervention.” Biomarkers typically undergo discovery and development phases. In biomarker discovery or development, the laboratory assays for the markers must be standardized in a way that results are comparable among a variety of laboratories. The importance of a standardized, well-controlled approach to biospecimen management and biobank operation to biomarker discovery is also well-established. A multitude of factors including preanalytical variables can affect biospecimen quality and as a result the analyses necessary to discover and validate biomarkers. Biospecimens of consistent quality are necessary as critical starting materials for biomarker discovery and the clinical assay development processes. Biobanks that serve as sources of biospecimens for biomarker studies should adhere to best practices such as those developed by international biobanking organizations. The importance of biobanking standards in biomarker discovery and development has also been recognized in several sets of recommendations and guidelines for authors, reviewers, and editors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nass SJ, Moses HL (2007) Cancer biomarkers. The promises and challenges of improving detection and treatment. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Khleif SN, Doroshow JH, Hait WN (2010) AACR-FDA-NCI cancer biomarkers collaborative consensus report: advancing the use of biomarkers in cancer drug development. Clin Cancer Res 16:3299–3318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taube SE, Clark GM, Dancey JE et al (2009) A perspective on challenges and issues in biomarker development and drug and biomarker codevelopment. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1453–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Poste G, Carbone DP, Parkinson DR et al (2012) Leveling the playing field: bringing development of biomarkers and molecular diagnostics up to the standards for drug development. Clin Cancer Res 18:1515–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The Cancer Genome Atlas. US National Human Genome Research Institute: http://cancergenome.nih.gov/abouttcga/overview. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  6. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455(7216):1061–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2011) Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474(7353):609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hewitt SM, Badve SS, True LD (2012) Impact of preanalytic factors on the design and application of integral biomarkers for directing patient therapy. Clin Cancer Res 18:1524–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zlobec I, Koelzer VH, Dawson H, Aurel Perren A, Lugli A et al (2013) Next-generation tissue microarray (ngTMA) increases the quality of biomarker studies: an example using CD3, CD8, and CD45RO in the tumor microenvironment of six different solid tumor types. J Transl Med 11:104–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zenobi R (2013) Single-cell mebabolomics: analytical and biological perspectives. Science 342:1201–1211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaught J, Henderson MK, Compton CC (2012) Biospecimens and biorepositories: from afterthought to science. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21:253–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. US National Cancer Institute Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch. http://www.biospecimens.cancer.gov. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  13. BBMRI (Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure). http://bbmri.eu/. Accessed 17 Dec 2013

  14. Standardisation and improvement of generic pre-analytical tools and procedures for in-vitro diagnostics (SPIDIA). http://www.spidia.eu/. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  15. US National Cancer Institute Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research Branch, Biospecimen Research Network Symposia. http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/meeting/brnsymposium/. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  16. International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Biospecimen Science Working Group Publications. http://www.isber.org/?page=WGP. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  17. Engel KB, Moore HM (2011) Effects of preanalytical variables on the detection of proteins by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med 135:537–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hewitt SM, Lewis FA, Cao Y et al (2008) Tissue handling and specimen preparation in surgical pathology: issues concerning the recovery of nucleic acids from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1929–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. ASCO–CAP HER2 Test Guideline Recommendations. Summary of guideline 2007 and 2013 recommendations. http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/committees/immunohistochemistry/summary_of_recommendations.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  21. Rollins G (2013) ASCO/CAP update HER2 testing guidelines. Clin Lab News. http://www.aacc.org/publications/cln/2013/december/Pages/HER2-Testing.aspx. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  22. Vaught J, Kelly A, Hewitt R (2009) A review of international biobanks and networks: success factors and key benchmarks. Biopreserv Biobank 7:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2010.0003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, et al.; for the Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI-EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics (2005) REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Eur J Cancer. 41:1690–1696

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moore HM, Kelly A, Jewell SD et al (2011) Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ). Biopreserv Biobank 9:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2010.0036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheah S, Dee S, Cole A, Matzke L, O’Donoghue S, Watson PH (2012) An online tool for improving biospecimen data element reporting. Biopreserv Biobank 10:501–510. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2012.0033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. National Cancer Institute Clinical Assay Development Program. https://cdp.cancer.gov/scientific_programs/pacct/cadp.htm. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  27. Williams PM, Lively TG, Jessup JM et al (2012) Bridging the gap: moving predictive and prognostic assays from research to clinical use. Clin Cancer Res 18:1531–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program presentation. http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/meeting/brnsymposium/2012/docs/Day2_Denise_Driscoll_Presentation.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  29. International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER). http://www.isber.org. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  30. European, Middle Eastern and African Society for Biopreservation and Biobanking (ESBB). http://www.esbb.org. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  31. Rothman N, Hainaut P, Schulte P, et al., editors 2011 Molecular epidemiology: principles and practices. International Agency for Research on Cancer Publication Number 163, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vaught, J. (2021). Biobanking for Biomarker Discovery. In: Hainaut, P., Vaught, J., Zatloukal, K., Pasterk, M. (eds) Biobanking of Human Biospecimens. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55901-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics