Skip to main content

CrEx-Wisdom Framework for Fusion of Crowd and Experts in Crowd Voting Environment – Machine Learning Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ADBIS, TPDL and EDA 2020 Common Workshops and Doctoral Consortium (TPDL 2020, ADBIS 2020)

Abstract

In recent years crowd-voting and crowd-sourcing systems are attracting increased attention in research and industry. As a part of computational social choice (COMSOC) crowd-voting and crowd-sourcing address important societal problems (e.g. participatory budgeting), but also many industry problems (e.g. sentiment analyses, data labeling, ranking and selection, etc.). Consequently, decisions that are based on aggregation of crowd votes do not guarantee high-quality results. Even more, in many cases majority of crowd voters may not be satisfied with final decisions if votes have high heterogeneity. On the other side in many crowd voting problems and settings it is possible to acquire and formalize knowledge and/or opinions from domain experts. Integration of expert knowledge and “Wisdom of crowd” should lead to high-quality decisions that satisfy crowd opinion. In this research, we address the problem of integration of experts domain knowledge with “Wisdom of crowds” by proposing machine learning based framework that enables ranking and selection of alternatives as well as quantification of quality of crowd votes. This framework enables weighting of crowd votes with respect to expert knowledge and procedures for modeling trade-off between crowd and experts satisfaction with final decisions (ranking or selection).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Traunmueller, M., Fatah, G., Schieck, A.: Introducing the space recommender system: how crowd-sourced voting data can enrich urban exploration in the digital era. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pp. 149–156 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jung, H.J., Lease, M.: Inferring missing relevance judgments from crowd workers via probabilistic matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 1095–1096 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hong, H., Du, Q., Wang, G., Fan, W., Xu, D.: Crowd wisdom: the impact of opinion diversity and participant independence on crowd performance. In: Twenty-second Americas Conference on Information Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hill, S., Ready-Campbell, N.: Expert stock picker: the wisdom of (experts in) crowds. Int. J. Electr. Commer. 15(3), 73–102 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia, A.C., Klein, M.: pBOL: an idea filtering method based on negative multi-voting and Pareto aggregation (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175329

  6. Lees, A., Welty, C.: Discovering user bias in ordinal voting systems. In: Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 1106–1110 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatt, S., Chen, K., Shalin, V.L., Sheth, A.P., Minnery, B.: Who should be the captain this week? Leveraging inferred diversity-enhanced crowd wisdom for a fantasy premier league captain prediction. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 13, no. 01, pp. 103–113 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suran, S., Pattanaik, V., Draheim, D.: Frameworks for collective intelligence: a systematic literature review. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 53(1), 1–36 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dodevska, Z.A.: Computational social choice and challenges of voting in multi-agent systems. Tehnika 74(5), 724–730 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, L., Xu, P., Liu, D.: The effect of crowd voting on participation in crowdsourcing contests. In: Working paper (2019). 39 pages

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bennet, A., Bennet, D.: The decision-making process for complex situations in a complex environment. In: Burstein, F., Holsapple, C.W. (eds.) Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1, pp. 3–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu, C., Chai, Y., Liu, Y.: Literature review on collective intelligence: a crowd science perspective. Int. J. Crowd Sci. 2(1), 64–73 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mandic, K., Bobar, V., Delibašić, B.: Modeling interactions among criteria in MCDM methods: a review. In: Delibašić, B., Hernández, J.E., Papathanasiou, J., Dargam, F., Zaraté, P., Ribeiro, R., Liu, S., Linden, I. (eds.) ICDSST 2015. LNBIP, vol. 216, pp. 98–109. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18533-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi, F.: Preferences, Constraints, Uncertainty, and Multi-Agent Scenarios. ISAIM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson, S.E.: The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In: West, M.A. (ed.) Handbook of Work Group Psychology, pp. 53–75. Wiley, Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, N.R.: Reflections on Arrow’s theorem and voting rules. Publ. Choice 179(1–2), 113–124 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0524-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herings, P.J.-J., Houba, H.: The Condorcet paradox revisited. Soc. Choice Welfare 47(1), 141–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-016-0950-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Aitamurto, T., Landemore, H., Galli, J.S.: Unmasking the crowd: participants’ motivation factors, expectations, and profile in a crowdsourced law reform. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20(8), 1239–1260 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goel, A., Krishnaswamy, A.K., Sakshuwong, S., Aitamurto, T.: Knapsack voting for participatory budgeting. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. (TEAC) 7(2), 1–27 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghezzi, A., Gabelloni, D., Martini, A., Natalicchio, A.: Crowdsourcing: a review and suggestions for future research. Int. J. Manage. Rev. 20(2), 343–363 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Isinkaye, F.O., Folajimi, Y.O., Ojokoh, B.A.: Recommendation systems: P, methods and evaluation. Egyptian Inform. J. 16(3), 261–273 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dodevska, Z., Kovacevic, A., Vukicevic, M., Delibasic, B.: Two sides of collective decision making - votes from crowd and knowledge from experts. In: ICDSST 2020, EWG-DSS 6th International Conference on Decision Support System Technology (2020, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Takács, G., Tikk, D.: Alternating least squares for personalized ranking. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)

  25. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), October, pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lloyd, S.P.: Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 28(2), 129–137 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, F.T, Ting, K.M, Zhou, Z.H.: Isolation forest. In: 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 15 December 2008, pp. 413–422. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is a result of the project ONR - N62909-19-1-2008 supported by the Office for Naval Research, the United States: Aggregating computational algorithms and human decision-making preferences in multi-agent settings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Kovacevic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kovacevic, A., Vukicevic, M., Radovanovic, S., Delibasic, B. (2020). CrEx-Wisdom Framework for Fusion of Crowd and Experts in Crowd Voting Environment – Machine Learning Approach. In: Bellatreche, L., et al. ADBIS, TPDL and EDA 2020 Common Workshops and Doctoral Consortium. TPDL ADBIS 2020 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1260. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55814-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55814-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55813-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55814-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics