Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to reflect on the role referendums might play when it comes to national and European legitimacy and decision-making processes, by looking at these issues through the unusual prism of the only referendum ever held in Belgium, on King’s Leopold III right to rule in 1950 (the question royale). Belgium is founded upon a consensual political system which allows, with some caveats, to draw parallels with the EU, a polity that is held together by the consensus built among the Member States. The way in which the question royale played out in an ethnically divided Belgium seems to offer some insights into the polarising effects of EU-related referendums. Moreover, the unconstitutional nature of the Belgian 1950 referendum allows to highlight what has been referred to as the legitimacy clash between exercising direct democracy at a Member State level and the Union’s consensual decision-making processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Alen, A., Tilleman, B., & Peeters, P. (1992). Treatise on Belgian Constitutional Law. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.
Baczko, B. (1988). The Social Contract of the French: Sieyès and Rousseau. The Journal of Modern History, 60, S98–S125.
Baker, K. M., (1990). Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge University Press.
Binion, R. (1969). Repeat Performance: A Psychohistorical Study of Leopold III and Belgian Neutrality. History and Theory, 8(2), 213–259.
Bogaards, M., & Crepaz, M. M. L. (2002). Consociational Interpretations of the European Union. European Union Politics, 3(3), 357–381.
Bogdanor, V. (1994). Western Europe. In D. Butler & A. Ranney (Eds.), Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: Aei Press.
Boomgaarden, H. G. & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). Do European Elections Create a European Public Sphere? In W. van der Brug & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), (Un)intended Consequences of EU Parliamentary Elections. Oxford University Press, 19–35.
Closa, C. (2007). Why Convene Referendums? Explaining Choices in EU Constitutional Politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(8), 1311–1332.
Corbett, S. (2016). The Social Consequences of Brexit for the UK and Europe: Euroscepticism, Populism, Nationalism, and Societal Division. The International Journal of Social Quality, 6(1), 11–31.
Delpérée, F. (1985). Référendums. Centre de Recherche et d’Information Socio-Politiques.
Deschouwer, K. (2006). And the Peace Goes On? Consociational Democracy and Belgian Politics in the Twenty-first Century. West European Politics, 29(5), 895–911.
Fitzmaurice, J. (1996). The Politics of Belgium: A Unique Federalism. Belgium: C. Hurst & Co.
Glencross, A. (2016). Why the UK Voted for Brexit: David Cameron’s Great Miscalculation. New York, NY: Palgrave Pivot.
Hobolt, S. B. (2007). Taking Cues on Europe? Voter Competence and Party Endorsements in Referendums on European Integration. European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), 151–182.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Brown: Little.
Lejeune, Y., & Regnier, J. (1985). Belgique. In Référendums (pp. 13–78). CRISP: Bruxelles.
Lijphart, A. (1989). Democratic Political Systems: Types, Cases, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1(1), 33–48.
Mabille, X. (2000). Histoire politique de la Belgique (4th ed.). Bruxelles: CRISP.
Marchetti, R. (2009). Mapping Alternative Models of Global Politics. International Studies Review, 11(1), 133–156.
Ministère de l’Intérieur. (1950). Sénat de Belgique—Consultation populaire du 12 mars 1950, au sujet de la Question Royale.
Morel, L. (2007). The Rise of ‘Politically Obligatory’ Referendums: The 2005 French Referendum in Comparative Perspective. West European Politics, 30, 1041–1067.
Plattner, M. F. (2010). Populism, Pluralism, and Liberal Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 81–92.
Raad van State, (2003). ADVIES : Voorstel Van Decreet—van de heren Dirk Holemans, Sven Gatz, Peter De Ridder en André Denys—houdende instelling van een deelstatelijke volksraadpleging kaderend in de procedure van onderzoek. Vlaams Parlement, No. Stuk 1131 (2001–2002), Nr. 3.
Reuchamps, M. (2007). Cahier—Referendum as a Tool for Building European Identity. The Case of Belgium, Luxembourg, and The Netherlands. Cahiers de Sciences politiques de l’ULg, 17.
Risse, T. & Kleine, M. (2007). Assessing the Legitimacy of the EU’s Treaty Revision Methods. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(1), 69–80.
Rose, R. (2018). Referendum Challenges to the EU’s Policy Legitimacy—and How the EU Responds. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–19.
Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
Setälä, M. (1999). Referendums in Western Europe—A Wave of Direct Democracy? Scandinavian Political Studies, 22(4), 327–340.
Sinardet, D. (2009). Direct Democracy as a Tool to Shape a United Public Opinion in a Multilingual Society? Some Reflections Based on the Belgian Case. In D. Sinardet & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Public Opinion in a Multilingual Society: Institutional Design and Federal Loyalty. Brussels: Re-Bel Initiative.
Stojanović, N. (2006). Direct Democracy: A Risk or an Opportunity for Multicultural Societies? The Experience of the Four Swiss Multilingual Cantons. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 8(2), 108.
Thomson, R. (2010). The Relative Power of Member States in the Council. In D. Naurin & H. Wallace (Eds.), Unveiling the Council of the European Union (pp. 238–258). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Time. (1950). Belgium: Up in the Air. Retrieved from: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,858723,00.html.
Vatter, A. (2009). Lijphart Expanded: Three Dimensions of Democracy in Advanced OECD Countries? European Political Science Review, 1(1), 125.
Vos, L. (1998). The Flemish National Question. In K. Deprez & L. Vos (Eds.), Nationalism in Belgium: Shifting Identities, 1780–1995 (pp. 83–95). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Zürn, M. (2016). Opening Up Europe: Next Steps in Politicisation Research. West European Politics, 39(1), 164–182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wouters, J., Andrione-Moylan, A. (2021). The King Versus the People: Lessons from a Belgian Referendum. In: Smith, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of European Referendums . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55803-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55803-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55802-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55803-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)