Skip to main content

Review of Socio-Economic Development Pathway Scenarios for Climate Change Adaptation in Indonesia: Disaster Risk Reduction Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change Research, Policy and Actions in Indonesia

Part of the book series: Springer Climate ((SPCL))

  • 1168 Accesses

Abstract

The work of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on a Special Report on Emission Scenarios has pioneered the methods for greenhouse gas emission scenario associated with socio-economic development pathways in the coming century, followed by other models such as the Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs) in climate change and disaster risk. This scenario is useful to understand how human society develops the future assessment of climate change and to provide possible mitigation and response strategies. This chapter is aimed to review the current status of socio-economic scenario on climate change and disaster and risk reduction effort in scholarly literatures and to identify gaps and opportunities for future research and decision-making based on the reflection of existing Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) theories and emblematic case studies. We have conducted a semi-structured literature review and content analysis. The result of our analysis revealed that there is still a dearth of study on the application of different models of socio-economic forecasting scenarios to understand how would each pathway affect the vulnerability of certain type of disaster and its potential as a decision-making tool in Indonesia. However, there are opportunities to expand the methods and define socio-economic variables that go beyond the economic indicators (i.e. GDP), such as of welfare, health, education, social capital human development, participation and technology. Challenges are also identified, including the limitation of methodology, availability of data, lack of synergy between CCA and DRR, lack of interdisciplinarity, space for science–policy interface and political support. Future research on SSPs should pay attention to the aspect of multi-hazard approaches to climate change impact, emerging technology and its adverse impacts. We argued that projection is a highly important tool; however, largely reliable at the global scale rather than regional or national scale. To understand that climate variability and change is high, it is important to raise self-awareness on adaptation to future disasters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309(5737):1036–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environ Change 15(2):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakkour D, Enjolras G, Thouret JC, Kast R, Mei ETW, Prihatminingtyas B (2015) The adaptive governance of natural disaster systems: Insights from the 2010 mount Merapi eruption in Indonesia. International journal of disaster risk reduction 13:167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J, Cutter S, Rothman DS, Welle T, Garschagen M, van Ruijven B, O’Neill BC, Preston B, Kienberger S, Cardona OD, Siagian T, Hidayati D, Setiadi N, Binder C, Hughes B, Pulwarty R (2013) Scenarios for vulnerability: opportunities and constraints in the context of climate change and disaster risk. Climate Change, 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J, Cutter SL, Rothman DS, Welle T, Garschagen M, Van Ruijven B, Siagian T (2015) Scenarios for vulnerability: opportunities and constraints in the context of climate change and disaster risk. Climatic Change 133(1):53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Liu Y, Pan T, Liu Y, Sun F, Ge Q (2018) Population exposure to droughts in China under the 1.5 °C global warming target. Earth System Dyn 9(3):1097–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • Climate Watch Data (2019) https://www.climatewatchdata.org/contained/countries/IDN. Accessed 18 Mar 2019

  • Climate Action Tracker (2018) https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/indonesia/. Accessed 7 Mar 2019

  • CRED, UNISDR (2016) The Human Cost of Weather Related Disasters 1995–2015. https://www.unisdr.org/2015/docs/climatechange/COP21_WeatherDisastersReport_2015_FINAL.pdf

  • Cuaresma JC, Lutz W (2016) The demography of human development and climate change vulnerability: a projection exercise. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 1:241–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Djalante R, Holley C, Thomalla F (2011) Adaptive governance and managing resilience to natural hazards. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2(4):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan JL, Liang QM, Liang XJ, Tatano H, Kajitani Y, Wei Y. M. (2014). National vulnerability to extreme climatic events: the cases of electricity disruption in China and Japan. Natural hazards, 71(3), 1937–1956. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global environmental change, 16(3), 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology Soc 15(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P, Tavares AO, Sá L, Oliveira A, Fortunato AB, Dos Santos PP, Pinto PJ (2016) A local-scale approach to estuarine flood risk management. Nat Hazards 84(3):1705–1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeppe P (2016) Trends in weather related disasters–Consequences for insurers and society. Weather and climate extremes 11:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2018) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marfai MA, King L (2008) Tidal inundation mapping under enhanced land subsidence in Semarang. Central Java Indonesia. Natural hazards 44(1):93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marfai MA, Sekaranom AB, Ward P (2015) Community responses and adaptation strategies toward flood hazard in Jakarta. Indonesia. Natural hazards 75(2):1127–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVittie A, Cole L, Wreford A, Sgobbi A, Yordi B (2018) Ecosystem-based solutions for disaster risk reduction: Lessons from European applications of ecosystem-based adaptation measures. International journal of disaster risk reduction 32:42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melkonyan A (2014) Environmental and socio-economic vulnerability of agricultural sector in Armenia. Sci Total Environ 488:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki J, Schinko T, Hochrainer-Stigler S (2018) Mainstreaming of climate extreme risk into fiscal and budgetary planning: application of stochastic debt and disaster fund analysis in Austria. Regional Environ Change 18(7):2161–2172

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Grubler A, Riahi K, Roehrl RA, Rogner HH, Victor N (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios (SRES), a special report of Working Group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Lempert RJ, Janetos AC (2014) A framework for the development of new socio-economic scenarios for climate change research: introductory essay. Climatic Change 122(3):351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J, Nicholls RJ (2015) Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding-a global assessment. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0118571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Gunderson L, Carpenter S, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Riahi K, Ebi KL, Hallegatte S, Carter TR, van Vuuren DP (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic change 122(3):387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opitz-Stapleton S, MacClune K (2012) Chapter 11 Scientific and Social Uncertainties in Climate Change: The Hindu Kush-Himalaya in Regional Perspective. In Climate Change Modeling for Local Adaptation in The Hindu Kush-Himalayan Region. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 207–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manage 21(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SE, Marshall NA, Jakku E, Dowd AM, Howden SM, Mendham E, Fleming A (2012) Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environmental Change 22(1):115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt AG, Tadross M, Nussbaumer P, Asante K, Metzger M, Rafael J, Brundrit G (2010) Estimating least-developed countries’ vulnerability to climate-related extreme events over the next 50 years. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(4):1333–1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preston BL (2013) Local path dependence of U.S. socioeconomic exposure to climate extremes and the vulnerability commitment. Global Environmental Change 23 (4):719–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Indonesia. (nd). The First National Communication: under the UNFCCC. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Indonesia%20INC.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019

  • Republic of Indonesia (2010) Second National Communication: under the UNFCCC. November, 2010. Jakarta. https://unfccc.int/files/national_reports/non-annex_i_natcom/submitted_natcom/application/pdf/indonesia_snc.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019

  • Republic of Indonesia (2016) First Nationally Determined Contribution. https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Indonesia%20First/First%20NDC%20Indonesia_submitted%20to%20UNFCCC%20Set_November%20%202016.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019

  • Republic of Indonesia (2017) Third National Communication: under the UNFCCC. Jakarta. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/8360571_Indonesia-NC3-2-Third%20National%20Communication%20-%20Indonesia%20-%20editorial%20refinement%2013022018.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2019

  • Shove E (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ Plan A 42(6):1273–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environ Change 16(3):282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins E, Adger WN (2004) Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecology and society 9(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Triyanti A, Walz Y, Marfai MA, Renaud F, Djalante R (2017) Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in Indonesia: unfolding challenges and opportunities. In: Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia, Springer, Cham, pp 445–467

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDRR (2019) Cyclone Idai highlights urgent need to ensure resilience of infrastructure to extreme weather. https://www.undrr.org/news/cyclone-idai-highlights-urgent-need-ensure-resilience-infrastructure-extreme-weather. Accessed 6 Mar 2019

  • UNFCCC (2018a) Proposal by the president. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Informal%20Compilation_proposal%20by%20the%20President_rev.pdf. Accessed 7 January 2019.

  • UNFCCC (2018b) Statement by Indonesia at the joint closing plenary of cop24, cmp14, cma1 2018. https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/SubmissionsStaging/Documents/201812190916---INDONESIA%20Fin%202_Closing%20Joint%20Plenary%2014Dec.docx_rev3.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2019.

  • UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris agreement. Draft decision. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2019

  • UNGA (2015) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015: 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. Accessed 5 Mar 2019

  • UNISDR (2015) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNISDR, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Masui T (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic change 109(1–2):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, O’Neill BC, Ebi KL, Riahi K, Carter TR, Edmonds J, Hallegatte S, Kram T, Mathur R, Winkler H (2013) A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture. Climatic Change, Special Issue, Nakicenovic N, Lempert R, Janetos A (eds) A Framework for the Development of New Socioeconomic Scenarios for Climate Change Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss M (2008) The vulnerable can't speak. An integrative vulnerability approach to disaster and climate change research. Behemoth-A J Civilisation 1(3), 39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter, S, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Troni J, Biot Y, Tedd L, Hewitson BC, Smith DM, Sutton RT (2009) A review of climate risk information for adaptation and development planning. Int J Climatology: J Royal Meteorological Soc 29(9):1193–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Chatterton T (2011) Multiple models to inform climate change policy: a pragmatic response to the ‘beyond the ABC’debate. Environment and Planning A 43(12):2781–2787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011) Vulnerability, risk reduction, and adaptation to climate change: Indonesia. April 2011. https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2018-10/wb_gfdrr_climate_change_country_profile_for_IDN.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2019

  • World Bank (nd) Country Profile Indonesia. Climate Change Knowledge Portal. https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country/indonesia. Accessed 12 Mar 2019

  • World Meteorological Organization (2018) WMO Statement on the State of the Global Climate in 2018. World Meteorological Organization (WMO)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annisa Triyanti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Triyanti, A., Marfai, M.A., Mei, E.T.W., Rafliana, I. (2021). Review of Socio-Economic Development Pathway Scenarios for Climate Change Adaptation in Indonesia: Disaster Risk Reduction Perspective. In: Djalante, R., Jupesta, J., Aldrian, E. (eds) Climate Change Research, Policy and Actions in Indonesia. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55536-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics