Skip to main content

Numbered Possibilities: Chaucer and the Evolution of Late-Medieval Mathematics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and Mathematics
  • 637 Accesses

Abstract

Much more than a poet, Geoffrey Chaucer was an amateur astronomer, philosopher, and acquaintance of two influential Oxford logicians, and his literary work has great fun with the fourteenth-century coalescence of arithmetic, geometry, and logic into the single discipline more recognizable today as Mathematics. This essay covers the evolution of early probability theory; the development of more sophisticated approaches to arithmetic and geometry, especially in terms of divisibility; and the growing ingenuity of medieval ‘physics’, and takes a romp through the diapason of Chaucerian modes and interests, from stargazing to farting, from tavern dicing to the tragedy of inconstant love. Through it all emerges Chaucer’s fascination with the human possibilities and limitations of medieval mathematics, and the literary-critical value of his work’s logico-mathematical context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcuin (ascr.). 2003. “‘Propositiones ad acuendos iuvenes’ (‘Die älteste mathematische Aufgabensammlung in lateinischer Sprache’).” In Essays on Early Medieval Mathematics: The Latin Tradition, edited by Menso Folkerts. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Valerie. 2007. On Farting: Language and Laughter in the Middle Ages. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1984. “Physics.” Translated by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, edited by Jonathan Barnes, i, 315–446. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P. 2013a. “A Bradwardinian Benediction: The Ending of the Nun’s Priest’s Tale.” Medium Aevum 82, no. 2: 246–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Literature, Logic and Mathematics in the Fourteenth Century. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7716/.

  • Bellhouse, D. R. 2000. “De Vetula: A Medieval Manuscript Containing Probability Calculations.” International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 6: 123–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellhouse, D. R., and J. Franklin. 1997. “The Language of Chance.” International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 65: 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. A. W. 1974. Chaucer at Oxford and at Cambridge. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccaccio. 1929. The Filostrato of Giovanni Boccaccio. Translated with parallel text by Nathaniel Edward Griffin and Arthur Beckwith Myrick. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower-Tolland, Susan. 2002. “Instantaneous Change and the Physics of Sanctification: ‘Quasi-Aristotelianism’ in Henry of Ghent’s Quodlibet XV q. 13.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 no. 1: 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, John. 1966. John Buridan: Sophisms on Meaning and Truth. Translated by Theodore Kermit Scott. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnley, J. D. 1983. A Guide to Chaucer’s Language. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, Giovanni. 2007. “The Price for Risk-Taking: Marine Insurance and Probability Calculus in the Late Middle Ages.” Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics 3. http://www.jehps.net/Juin2007/Ceccarelli_Risk.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2010.

  • Chaucer, Geoffrey. 1984. Troilus and Criseyde: A New Edition of ‘The Book of Troilus’. Edited by B. A. Windeatt. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. The Riverside Chaucer. Edited by Larry D. Benson. Boston, MA.: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clagett, Marshall. 1959. The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delasanta, Rodney. 1991. “Chaucer and Strode.” Chaucer Review 26: 205–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, Bert, ed. 1974. A Chaucer Dictionary. Boston: Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkerts, Menso. 2003. “The Propositiones ad acuendos ivuvenes Ascribed to Alcuin.” In Essays on Early Medieval Mathematics: The Latin Tradition, edited by Menso Folkerts. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, James. 2015. The Science of Conjecture. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, Daniel, and Sandy Zabell. 1979. “On the Emergence of Probability.” Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 21: 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girotto, Vittorio, and Michel Gonzalez. 2006. “Norms and Intuitions in the Assessment of Chance.” In Norms in Human Development, edited by L. Smith and J. Vonèche, 220–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Edward, ed. 1974. A Source Book in Medieval Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. God and Reason in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Donald R. 1976. The Idea of the Canterbury Tales. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, John. 1965. “Troilus’ Predestination Soliloquy: Chaucer’s Changes from Boethius.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 66: 120–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ineichen, Robert. 1988. “Dante-Kommentare und die Vorgeschichte der Stochastik.” Historia Mathematica 5: 264–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Montague Rhodes. [1903] 2011. The Ancient Libraries of Canterbury and Dover: The Catalogues of the Libraries of Christ Church Priory and St. Augustine’s Abbey at Canterbury and of St Martin’s Priory at Dover. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, Joel. 1998. Economy and Nature in the Fourteenth-Century: Money, Market Exchange and the Emergence of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. 1956. “Studies in the History of Probability and Statistics: II. The Beginnings of a Probability Calculus.” Biometrika 43: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann, Norman. 1977. “Socrates Is Whiter Than Plato Begins to Be White.” Noûs 11: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. “Continua, Indivisibles, and Change in Wyclif’s Logic of Scripture.” In Wyclif in His Times, edited by Anthony Kenny, 31–65. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, Steven J. 1979. “Mathematics Iuxta Communem Modum Loquendi: Formation and Use of Definitions in Heytesbury’s De Motu Locali.” Comitatus 10: 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longeway, John. 2007. “William Heytesbury.” In Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/heytesbury/. Accessed 10 November 2012.

  • Lynch, Kathryn. 2000. Chaucer’s Philosophical Visions. Cambridge: Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSparran, ed. 2013. Middle English Dictionary. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med.

  • Meusnier, Norbert, and Sylvain Piron. 2007. “Medieval Probabilities: A Reappraisal.” Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics 3. http://www.jehps.net/Juin2007/MeusnierPiron_intro.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2010.

  • Murdoch, John E. 1975. “From Social into Intellectual Factors: An Aspect of the Unitary Character of Late Medieval Learning.” In The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning, edited by John Emery Murdoch and Edith Dudley Sylla, 271–348. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. “Propositional Analysis in Fourteenth-Century Natural Philosophy: A Case Study.” Synthese 40: 117–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. “Infinity and Continuity.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, edited by Norman Kretzmann and others, 564–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Timothy D. 1990. “Ars-Metrik: Science, Satire and Chaucer’s Summoner.” Mosaic 23: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Glending. 2009. “Measuring the Immeasurable: Farting, Geometry, and Theology in the Summoner’s Tale.” Chaucer Review 43: 414–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy, Roy J. 1967. “Chaucer’s ‘An Impossible’ (‘Summoner’s Tale’ iii, 2231).” Notes and Queries 14: 322–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piron, Sylvain. 2007. “Le traitement de l’incertitude commerciale dans la scolastique médiévale.” Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics 3. http://www.jehps.net/Juin2007/Piron_incertitude.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2010.

  • Rabelais, François. 1991. Gargantua and Pantagruel. Translated by Burton Raffel. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichl, Karl. 1989. “Chaucer’s Troilus: Philosophy and Language.” In The European Tragedy of Troilus, edited by Piero Boitani, 133–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robathan, Dorothy M., ed. 1957. “Introduction to the pseudo-Ovidian De Vetula.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 88: 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1968. The pseudo-Ovidian De Vetula. Amsterdam: Hakkert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spade, Paul Vincent. 1988. “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signfication.” In Lies, Language and Logic, edited by P. V. Spade, Ch. 4. London: Variorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. “Late Medieval Logic.” In Medieval Philosophy, edited by John Marenbon, 402–25. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, Edith. 1971. “Medieval Quantification of Qualities: The ‘Merton School’.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 8: 9–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. “The Oxford Calculators.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, edited by Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg, 540–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. “Swester Katrei and Gregory of Rimini: Angels, God, and Mathematics in the Fourteenth Century.” In Mathematics and the Divine, edited by T. Koetsier and L. Bergmans, 249–71. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, Peter W. 2010. Disseminal Chaucer: Rereading the Nun’s Priest’s Tale. Notre Dame, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz, Richard. 1990. Literarischer Nominalismus im Spätmittelalter: Eine Untersuchung zur Sprache, Charakterzeichnung und Struktur in Geoffrey Chaucers Troilus and Criseyde. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Curtis. 1960. William Heytesbury: Medieval Logic and the Rise of Mathematical Physics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyclif, John. 1893–1899. Johannis Wyclif, Tractatus de Logica. Edited by Michael Henry Dziewicki. London: Trübner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1913. “Responsiones ad argumenta Radulfi Strode.” In Johannis Wyclif, Opera Minora, edited by Johann Loserth, 175–200. London: Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baker, D. (2021). Numbered Possibilities: Chaucer and the Evolution of Late-Medieval Mathematics. In: Tubbs, R., Jenkins, A., Engelhardt, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and Mathematics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55478-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics