Abstract
Much more than a poet, Geoffrey Chaucer was an amateur astronomer, philosopher, and acquaintance of two influential Oxford logicians, and his literary work has great fun with the fourteenth-century coalescence of arithmetic, geometry, and logic into the single discipline more recognizable today as Mathematics. This essay covers the evolution of early probability theory; the development of more sophisticated approaches to arithmetic and geometry, especially in terms of divisibility; and the growing ingenuity of medieval ‘physics’, and takes a romp through the diapason of Chaucerian modes and interests, from stargazing to farting, from tavern dicing to the tragedy of inconstant love. Through it all emerges Chaucer’s fascination with the human possibilities and limitations of medieval mathematics, and the literary-critical value of his work’s logico-mathematical context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcuin (ascr.). 2003. “‘Propositiones ad acuendos iuvenes’ (‘Die älteste mathematische Aufgabensammlung in lateinischer Sprache’).” In Essays on Early Medieval Mathematics: The Latin Tradition, edited by Menso Folkerts. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Allen, Valerie. 2007. On Farting: Language and Laughter in the Middle Ages. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Aristotle. 1984. “Physics.” Translated by R. P. Hardie and R. K. Gaye. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, edited by Jonathan Barnes, i, 315–446. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Baker, D. P. 2013a. “A Bradwardinian Benediction: The Ending of the Nun’s Priest’s Tale.” Medium Aevum 82, no. 2: 246–53.
———. 2013b. Literature, Logic and Mathematics in the Fourteenth Century. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7716/.
Bellhouse, D. R. 2000. “De Vetula: A Medieval Manuscript Containing Probability Calculations.” International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 6: 123–36.
Bellhouse, D. R., and J. Franklin. 1997. “The Language of Chance.” International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 65: 73–85.
Bennett, J. A. W. 1974. Chaucer at Oxford and at Cambridge. London: Oxford University Press.
Boccaccio. 1929. The Filostrato of Giovanni Boccaccio. Translated with parallel text by Nathaniel Edward Griffin and Arthur Beckwith Myrick. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Brower-Tolland, Susan. 2002. “Instantaneous Change and the Physics of Sanctification: ‘Quasi-Aristotelianism’ in Henry of Ghent’s Quodlibet XV q. 13.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 no. 1: 19–46.
Buridan, John. 1966. John Buridan: Sophisms on Meaning and Truth. Translated by Theodore Kermit Scott. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Burnley, J. D. 1983. A Guide to Chaucer’s Language. London: Macmillan.
Ceccarelli, Giovanni. 2007. “The Price for Risk-Taking: Marine Insurance and Probability Calculus in the Late Middle Ages.” Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics 3. http://www.jehps.net/Juin2007/Ceccarelli_Risk.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2010.
Chaucer, Geoffrey. 1984. Troilus and Criseyde: A New Edition of ‘The Book of Troilus’. Edited by B. A. Windeatt. Harlow: Longman.
———. 1987. The Riverside Chaucer. Edited by Larry D. Benson. Boston, MA.: Houghton Mifflin.
Clagett, Marshall. 1959. The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. London: Oxford University Press.
Delasanta, Rodney. 1991. “Chaucer and Strode.” Chaucer Review 26: 205–18.
Dillon, Bert, ed. 1974. A Chaucer Dictionary. Boston: Hall.
Folkerts, Menso. 2003. “The Propositiones ad acuendos ivuvenes Ascribed to Alcuin.” In Essays on Early Medieval Mathematics: The Latin Tradition, edited by Menso Folkerts. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Franklin, James. 2015. The Science of Conjecture. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Garber, Daniel, and Sandy Zabell. 1979. “On the Emergence of Probability.” Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 21: 33–53.
Girotto, Vittorio, and Michel Gonzalez. 2006. “Norms and Intuitions in the Assessment of Chance.” In Norms in Human Development, edited by L. Smith and J. Vonèche, 220–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grant, Edward, ed. 1974. A Source Book in Medieval Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2001. God and Reason in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howard, Donald R. 1976. The Idea of the Canterbury Tales. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Huber, John. 1965. “Troilus’ Predestination Soliloquy: Chaucer’s Changes from Boethius.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 66: 120–25.
Ineichen, Robert. 1988. “Dante-Kommentare und die Vorgeschichte der Stochastik.” Historia Mathematica 5: 264–69.
James, Montague Rhodes. [1903] 2011. The Ancient Libraries of Canterbury and Dover: The Catalogues of the Libraries of Christ Church Priory and St. Augustine’s Abbey at Canterbury and of St Martin’s Priory at Dover. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaye, Joel. 1998. Economy and Nature in the Fourteenth-Century: Money, Market Exchange and the Emergence of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendall, M. G. 1956. “Studies in the History of Probability and Statistics: II. The Beginnings of a Probability Calculus.” Biometrika 43: 1–14.
Kretzmann, Norman. 1977. “Socrates Is Whiter Than Plato Begins to Be White.” Noûs 11: 3–15.
———. 1986. “Continua, Indivisibles, and Change in Wyclif’s Logic of Scripture.” In Wyclif in His Times, edited by Anthony Kenny, 31–65. Oxford: Clarendon.
Livesey, Steven J. 1979. “Mathematics Iuxta Communem Modum Loquendi: Formation and Use of Definitions in Heytesbury’s De Motu Locali.” Comitatus 10: 9–20.
Longeway, John. 2007. “William Heytesbury.” In Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/heytesbury/. Accessed 10 November 2012.
Lynch, Kathryn. 2000. Chaucer’s Philosophical Visions. Cambridge: Brewer.
McSparran, ed. 2013. Middle English Dictionary. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med.
Meusnier, Norbert, and Sylvain Piron. 2007. “Medieval Probabilities: A Reappraisal.” Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics 3. http://www.jehps.net/Juin2007/MeusnierPiron_intro.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2010.
Murdoch, John E. 1975. “From Social into Intellectual Factors: An Aspect of the Unitary Character of Late Medieval Learning.” In The Cultural Context of Medieval Learning, edited by John Emery Murdoch and Edith Dudley Sylla, 271–348. Dordrecht: Reidel.
———. 1979. “Propositional Analysis in Fourteenth-Century Natural Philosophy: A Case Study.” Synthese 40: 117–146.
———. 1982. “Infinity and Continuity.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, edited by Norman Kretzmann and others, 564–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Brien, Timothy D. 1990. “Ars-Metrik: Science, Satire and Chaucer’s Summoner.” Mosaic 23: 1–22.
Olson, Glending. 2009. “Measuring the Immeasurable: Farting, Geometry, and Theology in the Summoner’s Tale.” Chaucer Review 43: 414–27.
Pearcy, Roy J. 1967. “Chaucer’s ‘An Impossible’ (‘Summoner’s Tale’ iii, 2231).” Notes and Queries 14: 322–25.
Piron, Sylvain. 2007. “Le traitement de l’incertitude commerciale dans la scolastique médiévale.” Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics 3. http://www.jehps.net/Juin2007/Piron_incertitude.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2010.
Rabelais, François. 1991. Gargantua and Pantagruel. Translated by Burton Raffel. New York: Norton.
Reichl, Karl. 1989. “Chaucer’s Troilus: Philosophy and Language.” In The European Tragedy of Troilus, edited by Piero Boitani, 133–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robathan, Dorothy M., ed. 1957. “Introduction to the pseudo-Ovidian De Vetula.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 88: 197–207.
———. 1968. The pseudo-Ovidian De Vetula. Amsterdam: Hakkert.
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1988. “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signfication.” In Lies, Language and Logic, edited by P. V. Spade, Ch. 4. London: Variorum.
———. 1998. “Late Medieval Logic.” In Medieval Philosophy, edited by John Marenbon, 402–25. London: Routledge.
Sylla, Edith. 1971. “Medieval Quantification of Qualities: The ‘Merton School’.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 8: 9–39.
———. 1982. “The Oxford Calculators.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, edited by Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny, and Jan Pinborg, 540–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2005. “Swester Katrei and Gregory of Rimini: Angels, God, and Mathematics in the Fourteenth Century.” In Mathematics and the Divine, edited by T. Koetsier and L. Bergmans, 249–71. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Travis, Peter W. 2010. Disseminal Chaucer: Rereading the Nun’s Priest’s Tale. Notre Dame, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Utz, Richard. 1990. Literarischer Nominalismus im Spätmittelalter: Eine Untersuchung zur Sprache, Charakterzeichnung und Struktur in Geoffrey Chaucers Troilus and Criseyde. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Wilson, Curtis. 1960. William Heytesbury: Medieval Logic and the Rise of Mathematical Physics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Wyclif, John. 1893–1899. Johannis Wyclif, Tractatus de Logica. Edited by Michael Henry Dziewicki. London: Trübner.
———. 1913. “Responsiones ad argumenta Radulfi Strode.” In Johannis Wyclif, Opera Minora, edited by Johann Loserth, 175–200. London: Paul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, D. (2021). Numbered Possibilities: Chaucer and the Evolution of Late-Medieval Mathematics. In: Tubbs, R., Jenkins, A., Engelhardt, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and Mathematics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55478-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55478-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55477-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55478-1
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)