Skip to main content

The Female Offender

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Correctional Assessment, Casework, and Counseling

Abstract

The most universal finding in criminal justice is that, across time and space, males offend at significantly greater rates than females. Although this “gender-gap” has begun to close somewhat, the differences remain stark. Understanding why females offend has been a challenge. Most criminological theories are considered “malestream” theories as they were originally developed and tested on male populations, and their applicability to explaining why women offend can be limited. Research suggests that while male and female offenders do not totally differ in what explains their offending, the gendered lives that individuals live can play a part in understanding offending behavior. Among women, histories of trauma and victimization often underpin offending behavior. Special consideration of these experiences is necessary for effectively counsel female offenders. Feminist counselors focus on these gender dynamics and how they may impact both clients as well as the client-counselor relationship using techniques that help women examine their own perspectives of traditional gender roles and empower them to take control of their lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barash, D., & Lipton, J. (2001). Making sense of sex. In D. Barash (Ed.), Understanding violence. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, A., Hunter, B. A., Salina, D. D., & Jason, L. A. (2017). Empowerment and social support: Implications for practice and programming among minority women with substance abuse and criminal justice histories. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 44(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J. (2014). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Toronto, ON: Nelson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085105282897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., Farrington, D. P., & Huesmann, L. R. (2005). Explaining gender differences in crime and violence: The importance of social cognitive skills. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(3), 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. (2000). Gender-responsive supervision and programming for women offenders in the community. In Responding to women offenders in the community (pp. 11–18). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2006). Sex differences in direct aggression: What are the psychological mediators? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(3), 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2009). Gender and crime: An evolutionary perspective. In A. Walsh & K. Beaver (Eds.), Criminology and biology: New directions in theory and research (pp. 117–136). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Muncer, S., & Bibel, D. (2001). Women and crime: An evolutionary approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(5), 481–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, E. A. (2018). Prisoners in 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. O. (1970). Multifactorial genetic disease. Hospital Practice, 5(5), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1970.11705857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (1995). Girls, delinquency and juvenile justice: Toward a feminist theory of young women’s crime. In B. Price & N. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women: Offenders, victims, and workers (pp. 71–88). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind, M. (2000). Women and the criminal justice system: Gender matters. In Responding to women offenders in the community (pp. 7–10). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, S. M., Tolou-Shams, M., Rizzo, C. J., Placella, N., & Brown, L. K. (2014). Gender differences in recidivism rates for juvenile justice youth: The impact of sexual abuse. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. (2009). Foreword. In A. Walsh & K. Beaver (Eds.), Biosocial criminology: New directions in theory and research (pp. xv–xvii). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, K. (1964). The premenstrual syndrome. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domes, G., Heinrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C., & Herpertz, S. C. (2007). Oxytocin improves “mind-reading” in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 61(6), 731–733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, C. Z. (1993). Twenty years of feminist counseling and therapy: From naming biases to implementing multifaceted practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 21(1), 3–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. M., Kincade, E. A., Marbley, A. F., & Seem, S. R. (2005). Feminism and feminist therapy: Lessons from the past and hopes for the future. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(3), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, E. J., Putman, P., & Van Honk, J. (2006). Testosterone administration reduces empathetic behavior: A facial mimicry study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31(7), 859–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. (1979). Sex differences in criminal activity. Social Problems, 27, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M. (2004). Brain gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeble, D. (2018). Probation and parole in the United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knickmeyer, R., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Fetal Testosterone and Empathy. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 282–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. (1995). Women of color in the criminal justice system. In B. Price & N. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women: Offenders, victims, and workers. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschi, T., Morgen, K., Bradley, C., & Hatcher, S. S. (2008). Exploring gender differences on internalizing and externalizing behavior among maltreated youth: Implications for social work action. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 25(6), 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-008-0139-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. (2003). An introduction to counseling (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(3), 523–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behaviour: Conduct disorder, delinquency and violence in the Dunedin longitudinal study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T., & Walsh, A. (2003). The adolescence-limited/life-course persistent theory of antisocial behavior: What have we learned? In A. Walsh & L. Ellis (Eds.), Biosocial criminology: Challenging environmentalism’s supremacy (pp. 123–144). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, D. (2000). Project reconnect: Responding to women offenders on a personal level. In Responding to women offenders in the community (pp. 7–10). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A. (1993). The psychopathology of crime: Criminal behavior as a clinical disorder. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, E. (1995). Minority women and domestic violence: The unique dilemmas of battered women of color. In B. Price & N. Sokoloff (Eds.), The criminal justice system and women: Offenders, victims, and workers. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, J. (1983). Should prisoners be classified by sex? In J. Doig (Ed.), Criminal corrections: Ideals and realities. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, S. H., & Waldman, I. D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 128(3), 490–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rueckert, L., & Naybar, N. (2008). Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 67(2), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. (1993). Biological and cultural diversity: The legacy of Darwin for development. Child Development, 64(5), 1333–1353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J., Steffensmeier, D. J., & Feldmeyer, B. (2009). Assessing trends in women’s violence via data triangulation: Arrests, convictions, incarcerations, and victim reports. Social Problems, 56(3), 494–525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. (2004). VII. Opening a can of worms? Counseling for survivors in UK women’s prisons. Feminism & Psychology, 14(2), 256–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, R. A. (2003). Identifying the special needs of female offenders. Federal Probation, 67, 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slattery, J. (2004). Counseling diverse clients: Bringing context into therapy. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1976). Women, crime, and criminology: A feminist critique. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2006). Juvenile arrests, 2006. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, S. B. (1979). Separate principles for counselors of women: A new form of sexism. The Counseling Psychologist, 8, 49–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., & Allan, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 459–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 273–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hulle, C. A., Rodgers, J. L., D’Onofrio, B. M., Waldman, I. D., & Lahey, B. B. (2007). Sex differences in the causes of self-reported adolescent delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116(2), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.2.236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, P., Peiler, J. Presser, L. Spiropoulis, G., & Sutherland, J. (2003). Classification of women offenders: A national assessment of current practices and the experience of three states. Report to the National Institute of Corrections. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wormer, K., & Kaplan, L. E. (2006). Results of a national survey of wardens in women’s prisons: The case for gender specific treatment. Women & Therapy, 29(1–2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaske, J., Wright, J. P., Boisvert, D., & Beaver, K. M. (2011). Gender, genetic risk, and criminal behavior. Psychiatry Research, 185(3), 376–381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A., & Vaske, J. (2015). Feminist criminology through a biosocial lens. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widom, C. S. (2000). Childhood victimization and the derailment of girls and women to the criminal justice system. Research on Women and Girls in the Justice System, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiewel, B., & Mosley, T. (2006). Family foundations: A new program for pregnant and parenting women offenders with substance abuse histories. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(1), 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J., Williams, E. N., Darby, M., Herald, J., & Schultz, C. (2018). Just for women? Feminist multicultural therapy with male clients. Sex Roles, 78(5–6), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0819-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worell, J., & Remer, P. (1992). Feminist perspectives in therapy: An empowerment model for women. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

19.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Data 19.1

(PPTX 119 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Walsh, A., Wells, J., Gann, S.M. (2020). The Female Offender. In: Correctional Assessment, Casework, and Counseling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55226-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics