Skip to main content

Using Community Agencies and Volunteers in Case Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Correctional Assessment, Casework, and Counseling

Abstract

Providing individual and group counseling for offenders is far from sufficient for good case management. Often the process of changing offending behavior requires accurately assessing offenders’ concrete, physical, here-and-now needs and knowing how to go about helping them to meet these needs. The correctional worker knows that more concrete help for the offender is often needed and knows where to find it. Attempting to move the offender toward a more responsible lifestyle is a difficult task that you need not bear alone. Case management consists of correctional workers indirectly delivering services by using networks of collaborative providers. Probation and parole agencies simply do not have the resources to provide for all the needs of the offenders. This chapter provides an overview of the types of community resource agencies available in most cities that correctional workers can use to aid in the rehabilitation process, including mental health centers, substance abuse centers, educational and vocational education, welfare agencies, victim-offender reconciliation programs, and volunteer officers. It also provides a list of national volunteer/nonprofit organizations for both offenders and victims, including descriptions and contact information for each.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carlson, E., & Parks, E. (1979). Critical issues in adult probation: Issues in probation management. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, D. (2005). Probation, parole, and community corrections (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (1975). The Texas pre-release program. In L. Hippchen (Ed.), Correctional classification and treatment. Anderson: Cincinnati, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, R. (1990). Victim-offender reconciliation programs in North America: An assessment. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal justice, restitution, and reconciliation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In Criminal justice 2000. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, G. F. (2009). The art of the con: Avoiding offender manipulation (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Correctional Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2009). 9 to 5 beats ten to life: How to (re)enter society (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Correctional Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delany, P., Fletcher, B., & Shields, J. (2003). Reorganizing care for the substance using offender: The case for collaboration. Federal Probation, 67, 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanser, R. D. (2014). Community corrections (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen, R. (1981). Probation and parole. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, H., Weinberger, L., & Gross, B. (2004). Mentally ill persons in the criminal justice system. Psychiatric Quarterly, 75, 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2015). Corrections in the community (6th ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauen, R. (1997). Positive approaches to corrections: Research, policy and practice. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, W. (1987). Staff perceptions of volunteers in a correctional program. Journal of Crime and Justice, 10, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. (1990). Results of research from British experiments with restorative justice. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal justice, restitution, and reconciliation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B. R., & McCarthy, B. J. (1984). Community-based corrections. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, M., & Krause, W. (1993). Community corrections. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T., & Bogue, B. (2010). Collaborating with the community, trained volunteers and faith traditions: Building social capacity and making meaning to support desistance. In F. McNeill, P. Raynor, & C. Trotter (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, S., & Dzur, A. (2004). Revisiting informal justice: Restorative justice and democratic professionalism. Law and Society Review, 38, 139–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pate, K. (1990). Victim-offender reconciliation as alternative measures programs in Canada. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal justice, restitution, and reconciliation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2011). Community corrections: Probation, parole, and prisoner reentry. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime and public policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieier, I. (1974). The professional and the volunteer in probation: An emerging relationship. In G. Killinger & P. Crowmwell (Eds.), Corrections in the community. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, S., & Muraskin, R. (2003). The incarcerated woman: Rehabilitative programming in women’s prisons. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (1993). Probation department in Michigan finds volunteers make fine officers. Corrections Today, 55, 80–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohr, M. K., & Walsh, A. (2018). Corrections: From research, to policy, to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenczek, T. (1990). A review and assessment of victim-offender reconciliation programs in West Germany. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal justice, restitution, and reconciliation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M. (1994). Victim meets offender: The impact of restorative justice and mediation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M. (1998). Restorative justice through victim-offender mediation: A multi-side assessment. Western Criminology Review, 1, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (1985). An evaluation of the effects of adult basic education on rearrest rates among probationers. Journal of Offender Counseling Services and Rehabilitation, 9, 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

11.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Data 11.1

(PPTX 50 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Walsh, A., Wells, J., Gann, S.M. (2020). Using Community Agencies and Volunteers in Case Management. In: Correctional Assessment, Casework, and Counseling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55226-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics