Skip to main content

The Europeanization of National Knowledge Regimes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Contestation of Expertise in the European Union

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

Abstract

Decision-making in the European Union is often characterized as technocratic and depoliticized. But has European integration also increased the role of experts and expertise in national policy-making? The chapter addresses this issue by developing a theoretical argument about the interaction between the ‘knowledge regimes’ at the European and national levels. It argues that national institutions for the provision of knowledge and advice may adapt to the knowledge architecture at the EU level, through pressure from EU-level institutions, imitation and expert networks. Yet, there are also mechanisms that work towards continued variation, such as institutional complementarities and path dependence. The chapter discusses mechanisms of adaptation or continued divergence within four institutional sites: expert agencies; advisory bodies and consultation mechanisms; parliamentary expertise; and research and education policy and institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There may of course also be transversal Links, such as between the policy-making regime at the EU level and the production regime at the national level. For the sake of simplicity, these links are not examined or depicted here.

References

  • Arras, Sarah, and Caelesta Braun. “Stakeholders Wanted! Why and How European Union Agencies Involve Non-state Stakeholders.” Journal of European Public Policy 25, no. 9 (2018): 1257–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Michael W., and Jarle Trondal. The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, Jan, and Bart Kerremans. “Critical Resource Dependencies and The Europeanization of Domestic Interest Groups.” Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 3 (2007): 460–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, Pieter. “Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: The Logic of Access.” Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 3 (2002): 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. The National Origins of Policy Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. “Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy.” Socio-Economic Review 13, no. 4 (2015): 679–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Johan. “Recruitment and Expertise in the European Commission.” West European Politics 38, no. 3 (2015): 649–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Johan. “Economic Knowledge and the Scientization of Policy Advice.” Policy Sciences 51, no. 3 (2018): 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Johan, and Cathrine Holst. “Advisory Commissions, Academic Expertise and Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of Norway.” Science and Public Policy 44, no. 6 (2017): 821–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, Jonathan, and John Halligan. “Assessing 30 years of Westminster Policy Advisory System Experience.” Policy Sciences 50, no. 1 (2017): 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crum, Ben, and John E. Fossum. “The Multi-Level Parliamentary Field: A Framework for Theorizing Representative Democracy in the EU.” European Political Science Review 1, no. 2 (2009): 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Porte, Caroline, and Arjen Van Dalen. “Europeanization of National Public Spheres? Cross-national Media Debates About the European Union’s Socio-economic Strategy.” European Politics and Society 17, no. 3 (2015): 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48, no. 2 (1983): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, Morten, and Jarle Trondal. “Why Strong Coordination at One Level of Government is Incompatible with Strong Coordination Across Levels (and How to Live with it): The Case of the European Union.” Public Administration 94, no. 3 (2016): 579–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exadaktylos, Theofanis, and Claudio Radaelli. Looking for Causality in the Literature on Europeanization: Research Design in European Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Frank. Democracy & Expertise: Reorienting Policy Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Åse, and Julia Metz. “Dynamics of Institution-building in the Europe of Knowledge: The Birth of the European Research Council.” In Building the Knowledge Economy in Europe, edited by Meng-Hsuan Chou, and Åse Gornitzka. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Åse, and Ulf Sverdrup. “Who Consults? The Configuration of Expert Groups in the European Union.” West European Politics 31, no. 4 (2008): 725–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, Hugh. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, Cathrine, and Anders Molander. “Public Deliberation and the Fact of Expertise: Making Experts Accountable.” Social Epistemology 31, no. 3 (2017): 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inderhaug, Erle. “En norsk likestillingsreform i EU.” In Europeisering av nordisk likestillingspolitikk, edited by Cathrine Holst, Hege Skjeie and Mari Teigen. Oslo: Gyldendal, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, Heike. “Europeanization of Lobbying Activities: When National Interest Groups Spill Over to the European Level.” Journal of European Integration 32, no. 2 (2010): 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico. Regulating Europe. London: Routledge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, Emmanuelle. Regulatory Delegation in the European Union: Networks, Committees and Agencies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Julia. The European Commission, Expert Groups, and the Policy Process. Demystifying Technocratic Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83, no. 2 (1977): 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Johan P. “The Many Faces of Europeanization.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 5 (2002): 921–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Johan P. Governing Through Institution Building. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 2 (2001), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, Claudio. ‘The Public Policy of the European Union: Whither Politics of Expertise?’ Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 2 (1999): 757–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, Claudio, Claire Dunlop, and Oliver Fritsch. “Narrating Impact Assessment in the European Union.” European Political Science 12, no. 4 (2013): 500–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, Claudio, and Romain Pasquier. “Encounters with Europe: Concepts, Definitions, and Research Design.” Politik 3, no. 9 (2006): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimkute, Dovile. “Organizational Reputation and Risk Regulation: The Effect of Reputational Threats on Agency Scientific Outputs.” Public Administration 96, no. 1 (2018): 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosén, Guria, and Silje H. Tørnblad. “How Does Expert Knowledge Travel Between EU Institutions? The case of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.” European Politics and Society 20, no. 1 (2018): 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibicke, Helena. “Europeisering av nordisk kvinnebevegelse”. In Europeisering av nordisk likestillingspolitikk, edited by Cathrine Holst, Hege Skjeie and Mari Teigen. Oslo: Gyldendal, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang. “Rejoinder: On Terminology, Functionalism, (Historical) Institutionalism and Liberalization.” Socio-Economic Review 3, no. 3 (2005): 577–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Wolfgang Streec, and Kathleen Thelen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, Hans-Jörg. Narrating European Society. London: Lexington Books, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, Jarle. “The Europeanisation of Research and Highed Education Policies: Some Reflections”, Scandinavian Political Studies 25, no. 4 (2001): 333–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, Jarle. An Emergent European Executive Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vestlund, Nina M. “Pooling Administrative Resources Through EU Regulatory Networks.” Journal of European Public Policy 24, no. 1 (2017): 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vibert, Frank. The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, David. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Christensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Christensen, J., Holst, C. (2021). The Europeanization of National Knowledge Regimes. In: Abazi, V., Adriaensen, J., Christiansen, T. (eds) The Contestation of Expertise in the European Union. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54367-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics