Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 394))

  • 279 Accesses

Abstract

Most digital processing nowadays is in digital format. Many transformations, such as contrast enhancement, restoration, color correction, etc. can be achieved through very simple and versatile algorithms However, a major branch of image processing algorithms makes extensive use of spatial transformations such as rotation, translation, zoom, anamorphosis, homography, distortion, derivation, etc. that are only defined in the analog domain. A digital image processing algorithm that mimics a spatial transformation is usually designed by using the so-called kernel based approach. This involves two kernels to ensure the continuous to discrete interplay: a sampling kernel and a reconstruction kernel, whose choice is highly arbitrary. The maxitive kernel based approach can be seen as an extension of the conventional kernel based approach and it reduces the impact of this arbitrary choice. It consists in replacing at least one of the kernels by a normalized fuzzy subset of the image plane. This replacement in the digital image spatial transformation framework leads to computing the convex set of all the images that would be obtained by using a (continuous convex) set of conventional kernels. Use of this set generates a kind of robustness that can reduce the risk of false interpretation. Medical imaging, for example, would be an application that could benefit from such an approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Computed Tomography scan is a computational method for reconstructing cross-sectional images from sets of X-ray measurements taken from different angles.

  2. 2.

    Positron-Emission Tomography is a nuclear medicine functional imaging technique used to observe metabolic processes in the body.

References

  1. Akrout, H., Crouzet, J-F., Strauss, O.: Multidimensional possibility/probability domination for extending maxitive kernel based signal processing. Fuzzy Sets Syst. (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloch, I.: Fuzzy sets for image processing and understanding. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 281, 280–291 (2015). Special Issue Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of Fuzzy Sets

    Google Scholar 

  3. Danielsson, P.-E., Hammerin, M.: High-accuracy rotation of images. CVGIP: Graph. Models Image Process. 54(4), 340–344 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denneberg, D.: Non-Additive Measure and Integral. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D.: Possibility theory and statistical reasoning. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51(1):47–69 (2006). The Fuzzy Approach to Statistical Analysis

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graba, F., Comby, F., Strauss, O.: Non-additive imprecise image super-resolution in a semi-blind context. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(3), 1379–1392 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Graba, F., Strauss, O.: An interval-valued inversion of the non-additive interval-valued f-transform: Use for upsampling a signal. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 288, 26–45 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Grabisch, M., Marichal, J.-L., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Aggregation Functions. Cambridge University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Komatsu, K., Sezaki, K.: Lossless rotation transformations with periodic structure. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005, vol. 2, pp. II–273 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kucharczak, F., Loquin, K., Buvat, I., Strauss, O., Mariano-Goulart, D.: Interval-based reconstruction for uncertainty quantification in pet. Phys. Med. Biol. 63(3), 035014 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kucharczak, F., Mory, C., Strauss, O., Comby, F., Mariano-Goulart, D.: Regularized selection: a new paradigm for inverse based regularized image reconstruction techniques. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Beijin, China (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lehmann, T.M., Gonner, C., Spitzer, K.: Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18(11), 1049–1075 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loquin, K., Strauss, O.: On the granularity of summative kernels. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159(15), 1952–1972 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Loquin, K., Strauss,O.: Linear filtering and mathematical morphology on an image: a bridge. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 3965–3968. Le Caire, Egypt (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nie, Y., Barner, K.E.: The fuzzy transformation and its applications in image processing. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(4), 910–927 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Omhover, J., Detyniecki, M., Rifqi, M., Bouchon-Meunier, B.: Ranking invariance between fuzzy similarity measures applied to image retrieval. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37542), vol. 3, pp. 1367–1372 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park, S.C., Park, M.K., Kang, M.G.: Super-resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview. Signal Process. Mag. IEEE 20(3), 21–36 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perfilieva, I., Novák, V., Dvořák, A.: Fuzzy transform in the analysis of data. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 48(18), 36–46 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rico, A., Strauss, O.: Imprecise expectations for imprecise linear filtering. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 51(8), 933–947 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Rico, A., Strauss, O.: Imprecise expectations for imprecise linear filtering. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 51(8), 933–947 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rico, A., Strauss, O., Mariano-Goulart, D.: Choquet integrals as projection operators for quantified tomographic reconstruction. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160(2), 198–211 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruspini, E.: New experimental results in fuzzy. Inf. Sci. 6, 273–284 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmeidler, D.: Integral representation without additivity. Process. Am. Math. Soc. 2 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shen, J., Castan, S.: Towards the unification of band-limited derivative operators for edge detection. Signal Process. 31(2), 103–119 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Strauss, O.: Non-additive interval-valued f-transform. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 1–24 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Unser, M.: Splines: a perfect fit for signal and image processing. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 16, 22–38 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Strauss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Strauss, O., Loquin, K., Kucharczak, F. (2021). On Maxitive Image Processing. In: Lesot, MJ., Marsala, C. (eds) Fuzzy Approaches for Soft Computing and Approximate Reasoning: Theories and Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 394. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54341-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics