Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revisional Surgery after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Obesity, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery

  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

During the last decades laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has been one of the most performed bariatric procedures. The trend has changed since long-term follow ups showed high percentage of complications especially, weight loss failure leading to revisional surgeries. Possible secondary interventions are laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass/ mini-bypass (OAGB) and malabsorptive procedures such as laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.

Long term follow-up proved that LSG and LRYGB are equally valid options as revisional surgeries in terms of weight loss and rate of complications. But in recent times the good outcomes of secondary OAGB have aroused the question that whether this is the best choice. The question about which intervention is the best option is still open.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3783–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garb J, Welch G, Zagarins S, et al. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1447–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9927-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vitiello A, Berardi G, Velotti N, et al. Is there an indication left for gastric band? A single center experience on 178 patients with a follow-up of 10 years. Updat Surg. 2021;73:657–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00858-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:740–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2510-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. te Riele WW, van Santvoort HC, Boerma D, et al. Rebanding for slippage after gastric banding: should we do it? Obes Surg. 2014;24:588–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1119-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Angrisani L, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedures after adjustable gastric band: 5-year outcomes. Obes Surg. 2017;27(6):1430–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neto MPG, Ramos AC, Campos JM, et al. Endoscopic removal of eroded adjustable gastric band: lessons learned after 5 years and 78 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:423–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.09.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lecot FP, Boerma E-JG, Sigterman-Nelissen R, et al. Conversion of adjustable gastric banding to adjustable banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: should we leave the band in place? Obes Surg. 2019;29:3912–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04106-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. 1967. Obes Res. 1996;4:316–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00553.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Etienne JH, Petrucciani N, Goetschy M, et al. Primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass results in greater weight loss at 15-year follow-up compared with secondary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failure of gastric band or Mason McLean vertical gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2020;30:3655–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04728-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marin-Perez P, Betancourt A, Lamota M, Lo Menzo E, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R. Outcomes after laparoscopic conversion of failed adjustable gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Br J Surg. 2014;101(3):254–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:255–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.20897.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1124–8. https://doi.org/10.1381/0960892055002248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pujol Rafols J, Al Abbas AI, Devriendt S, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or one anastomosis gastric bypass as rescue therapy after failed adjustable gastric banding: a multicenter comparative study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:1659–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Borrelli V, Iovino P. Sleeve gastrectomy with concomitant hiatal hernia repair in obese patients: long-term results on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Obes Surg Relat Dis. 2020;16(9):1171–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soricelli E, Iossa A, Casella G, Abbatini F, Cali B, Basso N. Sleeve gastrectomy and crural repair in obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatal hernia. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(3):356–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coblijn UK, Verveld CJ, van Wagensveld BA, Lagarde SM. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure after adjustable gastric band – a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1899–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Janik MR, Rogula TG, Mustafa RR, Alhaj Saleh A, Khaitan L. Safety of revision sleeve gastrectomy compared to Roux-Y gastric bypass after failed gastric banding: analysis of the MBSAQIP. Ann Surg. 2019;269:299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lessing Y, Nevo N, Pencovich N, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass as a revisional procedure after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2020;30:3296–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04569-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Musella M, Bruni V, Greco F, et al. Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:1332–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Poublon N, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2020;30(9):3287–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Csepel J, Quinn T, Pomp A, Gagner M. Conversion to a laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch for failed laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002;12:237–40. https://doi.org/10.1089/109264202760267998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J. Laparoscopic conversion of adjustable gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty to duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:678–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marion Y, Eid Y, Menahem B, Bion AL, Thobie A, Alves A. What to propose after failed adjustable gastric banding: one or two-step procedure? World J Surg. 2020;44(10):3423–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to Antonella Santonicola, Giampaolo Formisano, Ariola Hasani, and Michele Lorenzo for their work in producing this chapter in the first edition of the book.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, “Federico II” University of Naples, Naples, Italy

    Luigi Angrisani

  2. Department of Surgical Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Rossella Palma

  3. Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy

    Erica Archivolti

  4. Department of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, St Richard’s Hospital, Chichester, UK

    William Hawkins

  5. Department of Bariatric and Upper GI Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, London, UK

    Myutan Kulendran

Authors
  1. Luigi Angrisani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rossella Palma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erica Archivolti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William Hawkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Myutan Kulendran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Angrisani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Homerton University Hospital, London, UK

    Sanjay Agrawal

Section Editor information

  1. Department of Upper GI and Bariatric Surgery, St. George’s Hospital, London, UK

    Andrew Wan FRCS(I), FRCS(Gen Surg)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Angrisani, L., Palma, R., Archivolti, E., Hawkins, W., Kulendran, M. (2022). Revisional Surgery after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding. In: Agrawal, S. (eds) Obesity, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54064-7_42-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54064-7_42-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54064-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54064-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation