Skip to main content

A Dirty Word? The Christian Development of the Traditional Conception of Toleration in Augustine, Aquinas, and John Owen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Secularization, Desecularization, and Toleration

Abstract

As the first Christian theologian to write a defense of the use of force against schismatics, Augustine of Hippo has played an important role in the history of intolerance. His vision of the church as a mixed body, however, is also central to Christian thinking about toleration. Shifting our attention from his influential ideas about the limits of toleration to the more fruitful terrain of the nature of toleration, this chapter focuses on the role that Augustine’s understanding of evil has upon his understanding of toleration. The chapter next considers Aquinas’ expansion of Augustine’s ethics of toleration to the political realm, and finally John Owen’s adaptation of this mentality to the increasingly plural early modern world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Worden, “Toleration and the Cromwellian Protectorate,” 200.

  2. 2.

    Fiala , Tolerance and the Ethical Life.

  3. 3.

    Kreider , Patient Ferment.

  4. 4.

    Enarrationes in Psalmos 31, 2. My translations throughout for both Augustine and Aquinas.

  5. 5.

    Sermo 359a, 2.

  6. 6.

    For the place of tolerance between these dispositions, see Fletcher, “The Case for Tolerance.”

  7. 7.

    Sermo 359a, 2. See also Enarrationes in Psalmos 52, 1.

  8. 8.

    Rico , Legacy of Dignitatis Humanae, 85.

  9. 9.

    De sermone Domini in monte I, 5, 13.

  10. 10.

    Williams, “Toleration: An Impossible Virtue?,” 18.

  11. 11.

    Tocqueville, Letters from America, 89.

  12. 12.

    Horton, “Traditional Conception,” 295.

  13. 13.

    Mathewes , Evil and the Augustinian Tradition.

  14. 14.

    Contra Faustum XIX, 24.

  15. 15.

    Russell, “Augustine’s Secular Ambivalence.”

  16. 16.

    Bainton , “The Parable of the Tares.”

  17. 17.

    De civitate Dei I, 35.

  18. 18.

    Markus , Saeculum: History and Society in the Age of St. Augustine.

  19. 19.

    Gray, Enlightenment’s Wake, 27.

  20. 20.

    Kaufman , Incorrectly Political, 98.

  21. 21.

    Lombardini , “Stoicism and the Virtue of Toleration.”

  22. 22.

    For a representative version of this critique, see Brown , Regulating Aversion.

  23. 23.

    Virgil, Aeneid, VI, 853.

  24. 24.

    De civitate Dei, prologue (quoting Virgil).

  25. 25.

    Bejczy, “Tolerantia: A Medieval Concept,” 372.

  26. 26.

    Bejczy, 370–71.

  27. 27.

    The argument that follows is taken from Svensson, “Toleration in Aquinas?”

  28. 28.

    In Matt., cap. 13 l. 2. In his commentary on Colossians, Aquinas writes that virtue “cannot exist without patience and tolerance of evils,” In Col., cap. 1 l. 3. See also In II Thes., cap. 3 l. 1. In his systematic works, this approach can be found in places like S. Th. II–II, q. 128 ad 6.

  29. 29.

    S. Th. II-II, q. 10, a. 11.

  30. 30.

    S. Th. II-II, q. 10, a. 11.

  31. 31.

    S. Th. I-II, q. 92, a.2.

  32. 32.

    S. Th. I-II, q. 96, a.2.

  33. 33.

    For an influential version of this argument see Finnis, Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory, 228.

  34. 34.

    S. Th. I-II, q. 96, a. 2.

  35. 35.

    S. Th. II-II, q. 10, a. 12. It is important to underline that in contrast with the frequently quoted questions regarding the toleration of heretics (S. Th. II-II, q.10, a.11), the question regarding the baptism of Jewish children represented a new challenge. The question had only begun to be raised in the 1260s, and it is only in 1269 that Aquinas discussed it for the first time (in quodl. II, q. 4, a. 2). On this, see Turner, “Duns Scotus on Jews and Judaism,” 214.

  36. 36.

    Williams, The Bloody Tenent yet More Bloody, 325 and 327.

  37. 37.

    Works 8:55.

  38. 38.

    Nederman, “Historical and Global Perspectives.”

  39. 39.

    Remer , Humanism and the Rhetoric of Toleration.

  40. 40.

    Bejczy, “Tolerantia: A Medieval Concept,” 383.

  41. 41.

    In much recent literature—like Zagorin’s general history of toleration—Castellio is celebrated as “the first champion of religious toleration” circumventing this problem. Zagorin, How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West, 93; for a more reflective approach, see Curley, “Sebastian Castellio’s Erasmian Liberalism.”

  42. 42.

    For a contrast between Owen and Locke along these lines, see Svensson, “John Owen and John Locke.”

  43. 43.

    For his biography see Gribben, John Owen and English Puritanism.

  44. 44.

    For his stature as a scholastic theologian, see Trueman, John Owen; for his place in non-conformity, see Cooper, Formation of Nonconformity.

  45. 45.

    For the ups and downs of his writings on toleration see Coffey, “John Owen and the Puritan Toleration Controversy, 1649–59.”

  46. 46.

    Indulgence and Toleration Considered, in Works 13:532.

  47. 47.

    An Answer to Dr Stillingfleets Book of the Unreasonableness of Separation, in Works 15:406.

  48. 48.

    A Country Essay, in Works 8:57.

  49. 49.

    Works 13:530.

  50. 50.

    Works 13:531.

  51. 51.

    Works 13:532.

  52. 52.

    Works 8:57.

  53. 53.

    Works 8:57.

  54. 54.

    Of Toleration; and the Duty of the Magistrate About Religion, in Works 8:170.

  55. 55.

    Works 8:170.

  56. 56.

    Works 8:170.

  57. 57.

    Works 13:538.

  58. 58.

    For texts representative of these three approaches, see Ivanhoe, “Ethical Promiscuity”; Galeotti, Toleration as Recognition; Bretherton, “Toleration with Hospitality.”

  59. 59.

    Sabl acknowledges that his list of 12 conflicting frameworks for toleration is by no means comprehensive, but in the context of the present volume it makes sense to stress how markedly secular most of them are. See Sabl, “‘Virtuous to Himself’: Pluralistic Democracy and the Toleration of Tolerations,” 225–27.

  60. 60.

    Confessiones X, 28, 39.

Bibliography

  • Augustine. Confessiones, edited by Lucas Verheijen (CCSL 27). Turnhout: Brepols, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Contra Faustum, edited by Joseph Zycha (CSEL 25). Vienna: F. Tempsky, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. De civitate Dei, edited by B. Dombart and A. Kalb (CCSL 47–8). Turnhout: Brepols, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. De sermone Domini in monte, edited by Almut Mutzenbecher (CCSL 35). Turnhout: Brepols, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Enarrationes in Psalmos, edited by E. Dekkers and J. Fraipont (CCSL 38–40). (Turnhout: Brepols, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Sermo 359A (Lambot 4) in Patrologiae Latinae Supplementum II, edited by Adalbert Hamann Paris: Garnier, 1957–1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas. Opera omnia, ed. Leonina, vols. 4–12: Summa theologica Vatican City: Vatican Polyglot Press, 1888–1906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainton, Roland. “The Parable of the Tares as the Proof Text for Religious Liberty to the End of the Sixteenth Century.” Church History 1, 2 (1932): 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejczy, István. “Tolerantia: A Medieval Concept.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58, 3 (1997): 365–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, Luke. “Toleration with Hospitality.” In Christ and the Common Life. Political Theology and the Case for Democracy, 258–88. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, John. “John Owen and the Puritan Toleration Controversy, 1649–59.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to John Owen’s Theology, edited by Kelly M. Kapic and Mark Jones, 227–48. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Tim. John Owen, Richard Baxter, and the Formation of Nonconformity. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, Edwin. “Sebastian Castellio’s Erasmian Liberalism.” Philosophical Topics 31, 1–2 (2003): 47–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala, Andrew. Tolerance and the Ethical Life. London and New York: Continuum, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, John. Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, George P. “The Case for Tolerance.” Social Philosophy and Policy 13, 1 (1996): 229–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, Anna Elisabetta. Toleration as Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age. New York and London: Routledge, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gribben, Crawford. John Owen and English Puritanism. Experiences of Defeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, John. “Why the Traditional Conception of Toleration Still Matters.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14, 3 (2011): 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanhoe, Philip J. “Pluralism, Toleration, and Ethical Promiscuity.” Journal of Religious Ethics 37, 2 (2009): 311–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Peter Iver. Incorrectly Political. Augustine and Thomas More. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreider, Alan. The Patient Ferment of the Early Church. The Improbable Rise of Christianity in the Roman Empire. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardini, John. “Stoicism and the Virtue of Toleration.” History of Political Thought 36, 4 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, Robert. Saeculum: History and Society in the Age of St. Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathewes, Charles. Evil and the Augustinian Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nederman, Cary. “Toleration in a New Key: Historical and Global Perspectives.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14, 3 (2011): 349–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, John. The Works of John Owen, edited by W. H. Goold. 24 volumes. London: Johnstone and Hunter, 1850–1855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remer, Gary. Humanism and the Rhetoric of Toleration. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico, Hermínio. John Paul II and the Legacy of Dignitatis Humanae. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Frederick. “‘Only Something Good Can Be Evil’: The Genesis of Augustine’s Secular Ambivalence.” Theological Studies 51, 4 (1990): 698–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabl, Andrew. “‘Virtuous to Himself’: Pluralistic Democracy and the Toleration of Tolerations.” In Toleration and Its Limits, edited by Melissa Williams and Jeremy Waldron, 220–42. NOMOS XLVIII. New York and London: New York University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, Manfred. “A Defensible Conception of Toleration in Aquinas?” The Thomist 75, 2 (2011): 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. “John Owen and John Locke: Confessionalism, Doctrinal Minimalism, and Toleration.” History of European Ideas 43, 4 (2017): 302–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de. Letters from America. Translated by Frederick Brown. New York and London: Yale University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman, Carl R. John Owen: Reformed Catholic, Renaissance Man. Great Theologians Series. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Nancy L. “Jewish Witness, Forced Conversion, and Island Living: John Duns Scotus on Jews and Judaism.” In Christian Attitudes toward the Jews in the Middle Ages, edited by Michael Frassetto, 183–210. New York and London: Routledge, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgil. Aeneid. Translated by H. R-Fairclough. Revised edition. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. “Toleration: An Impossible Virtue?” In Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, edited by David Heyd, 18–27. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Roger. The Bloody Tenent yet More Bloody. The Complete Writings of Roger Williams. New York: Russell & Russell, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden, Blair. “Toleration and the Cromwellian Protectorate.” In Persecution and Toleration, edited by W.J. Sheils, 199–233. Studies in Church History 21. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagorin, Perez. How the Idea of Religious Toleration Came to the West. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Svensson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Svensson, M. (2020). A Dirty Word? The Christian Development of the Traditional Conception of Toleration in Augustine, Aquinas, and John Owen. In: Karpov, V., Svensson, M. (eds) Secularization, Desecularization, and Toleration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54046-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics