Skip to main content

The Immigration Policy of The United Kingdom: British Exceptionalism and the Renewed Quest for Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The EU Migration System of Governance

Part of the book series: The European Union in International Affairs ((EUIA))

Abstract

This chapter examines the UK’s immigration and asylum policy, pointing out the rationales underlying each phase of its development throughout the years, and how they relate to the ongoing transformation of the European Union Migration System of Governance—as well as the yet-to-be-determined post-Brexit relationships between the European Union and the country. In investigating the degree to which the UK’s policy complies with the conceptions of justice considered in this book—non-domination, impartiality and mutual recognition—the chapter will investigate the logic of Britain’s ‘quest for control’ of its borders and the make-up of its population, its distinctive attitude towards the Union’s and the international regime of refugee protection, as well as prospects for the country’s future participation in the System of Governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The withdrawal of the UK from the EU was officially campaigned for by the comparatively moderate ‘Vote Leave’, a cross-party group consisting of the Eurosceptic groups Conservatives for Britain (including most of the Conservative Party’s Members of Parliament supporting the withdrawal—almost half of them), Labour Leave and Business for Britain. The other Leave organization was Grassroots Out/Leave.EU, which endorsed the UK Independence Party, part of the Conservative Party, plus a handful of Labour MPs and the Democratic Unionist Party. The ‘Remainer’ camp, on the other hand, acted through the ‘Britain Stronger in Europe’ organization, bringing together businessmen, the Labour ‘In for Britain’ campaign and MPs from the Conservative, Liberal Democrat and Green parties. According to Hobolt (2016), from the outset of the campaign, the battle lines were starkly drawn up by the two sides: the economy versus immigration. Vasilopoulou (2016), on the other hand, while pointing out the great overlap in the arguments of the two Leave campaigns (the economic cost of membership, its effects thwarting Britain’s ambitions as a world leader and the unfair migration policy it implicated), finds Grassroots Out/Leave.EU more focused on migration. On 23 June 2016, 51.9% of British voters cast their ballot in favour of withdrawing from the EU.

  2. 2.

    According to Eurosceptics, to represent a threat would be (or better, would have been) not only a technocratic supranational polity, but also the very European-ness, as Europe is seen as the mother lode of warmongering, authoritarianism and extremism—as opposed to Britain’s allegedly innate disposition for liberty and democracy (Spiering 2004; Wellings and Baxendale 2015).

  3. 3.

    One of the most eminent cases is that of the 200,000 Asians expelled in 1968 from Kenya, left stateless after the UK (and India) refused their entry: Britain not only refused to abide by the 1951 Convention, but also disavowed any obligations towards people who had been until recently British citizens by imposing immigration controls (no matter what the reason for entering the country) on all British passport holders without at least one parent born, naturalised or registered in Britain as a citizen of Britain or its colonies—de facto favouring the entry of white Commonwealth citizens only.

  4. 4.

    The Labour Party remained highly divided on membership in the EC until its heavy defeat in the 1983 general election, which was run on a platform which included commitment to withdrawing from the EC.

  5. 5.

    Asylum seekers are generally counted in British statistics as a subset of migrants and are included in official estimates of migrant stocks and flows. See Sturge (2020).

  6. 6.

    Independent (2015), ‘Theresa May’s speech to the Conservative Party Conference’, 6 October. Available at https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-s-speech-to-the-conservative-party-conference-in-full-a6681901.html.

  7. 7.

    Minister of State for Immigration; Minister of State for Care Services; Minister of State for Employment; Minister of State for Government Policy, Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury; Minister of State for Housing and Local Government; Minister of State for Schools; Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs; Minister of State for Universities and Science; Minister of State for Justice; Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health; Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport.

  8. 8.

    Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union – PROTOCOLS – Protocol (No 19) on the Schengen, Official Journal, 115, 0290–0292 (09/05/2008).

  9. 9.

    Available respectively at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62005CJ0077_SUM&from=SL and http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?docid=71916&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=134038.

  10. 10.

    The Qualification Directive, the Procedures Directive, the Reception Conditions Directive and the Dublin and Eurodac Regulations.

  11. 11.

    BBC (2018), ‘Boris Johnson challenged over Brexit business “expletive”‘, 26 June. Available at https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-44618154.

  12. 12.

    Calais, together with Dunkerque, serves as an immigration control zone operated by the British police force on French soil (the French police do the same in Dover), as per the 2003 Le Touquet Treaty, a reciprocal arrangement between Belgium, France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom whereby border controls on certain cross-Channel routes take place before boarding the train or ferry, rather than upon arrival after disembarkation. In practice, the British authorities have the primary interest in this arrangement, as it enables them to block irregular migration from the continent. If a person is refused entry to the UK, or is found seeking to enter Britain clandestinely, they are handed over to the French authorities, to be processed under French law. The treaty also specifically provides that asylum claims are the responsibility of the state of departure, not the state running the control zone—so France is responsible for all asylum claims made in Calais, even to UK officials (Ryan 2016). In August 2016, there were an estimated 10,000 migrants living in dire humanitarian conditions in the large tent cities erected in Calais and nearby, with the largest groups coming from Afghanistan and Sudan.

  13. 13.

    The reference is to Conservative Member of Parliament Enoch Powell’s infamous 1968 speech in which he attacked mass immigration, comparing the growth of the country’s minority population to “watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre” (Friedersdorf 2018).

References

  • Aliverti, A. (2016, 12 October). Immigration Offences: Trends in Legislation and Criminal and Civil Enforcement. Migration Observatory briefing. COMPAS, University of Oxford, UK. Available at https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/immigration-offences-trends-in-legislation-and-criminal-and-civil-enforcement/.

  • Armbruster, H. (2018). It Was the Photograph of the Little Boy: Reflections on the Syrian Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Programme in the UK. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(15), 2680–2699. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2018.1554226.

  • Back, L., Keith, M., Khan, A., Shukra, K., & Solomos, J. (2002). New Labour’s White Heart: Politics, Multiculturalism and the Return of Assimilation. Political Quarterly, 73(4), 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balch, A., & Balabanova, E. (2016). Ethics, Politics and Migration: Public Debates on the Free Movement of Romanians and Bulgarians in the UK, 2006–2013. Politics, 36(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale, T., & Humpshire, J. (2012). Immigration Policy. In T. Heppell & D. Seawright (Eds.), Cameron and the Conservatives: The Transition to Coalition Government (pp. 89–104). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. (2011). Humanitarianism, Paternalism, and the UNHCR. In A. Betts & G. Loescher (Eds.), Refugees in International Relations (pp. 105–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Weiss, T. G. (2011). Humanitarianism Contested: Where Angels Fear to Tread. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashford, A., & McAdam, J. (2014). The Right to Asylum: Britain’s 1905 Aliens Act and the Evolution of Refugee Law. Law and History Review, 32(2), 309–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2018). Boris Johnson Challenged Over Brexit Business Expletive, 26 June. Available at https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-44618154.

  • Bellamy, R. (2019). A Republican Europe of States: Cosmopolitanism, Intergovernmentalism and Democracy in the EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevitori, C., & Zotti, A. (2019). Justice Claims in UK Media Narratives: Normative Orientations and EU Migration Governance. The International Spectator, 54(3), 72–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, S., & Richards, L. (2020, January 20). UK Public Opinion Toward Immigration: Overall Attitudes and Level of Concern. Migration Observatory briefing, COMPAS, University of Oxford, UK. Available at https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/uk-public-opinion-toward-immigration-overall-attitudes-and-level-of-concern/.

  • British Government. (2016). The Best of Both Worlds: The United Kingdom’s Special Status in a Reformed European Union. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-best-of-both-worlds-the-united-kingdoms-special-status-in-a-reformed-european-union.

  • Brokenshire, J. (2016). Refugees and Resettlement, Written statement HCWS687. Available at https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-statement/Commons/2016-04-21/HCWS687/.

  • Brown, G. (2019). Final Word. UNHCR Report. Available at ​https://www.unhcr.org/steppingup/final-word/.

  • Cameron, D. (2007). The Challenges of a Growing Population. Speech given on 29 October 2007. Available at http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/files/population.pdf.

  • Cameron, D. (2015). PM Speech on Immigration. Speech given on 21 May 2015. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-on-immigration.

  • Cangiano, A. (2016). Net Migration as a Target for Migration Policies: A Review and Appraisal of the UK Experience. International Migration, 54(2), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, J., Eatwell, R., & Wunderlich, D. (2015). The Politicisation of Immigration in Britain. In W. van der Brug et al. (Eds.), Support for and Opposition to Migration in Europe (pp. 175–194). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccorulli, M. (2021a). The EU’s Normative Ambivalence and the Migrant Crisis: (In) Actions of (In) Justice. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 33–56). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccorulli, M. (2021b). Italy and Migration: Justice on this Side of the Mediterranean. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 119–145). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecil, N. (2019, October 10). Brexit News Latest: Poll of Polls Says Britain Is Now Against Leaving EU as Most Want to Stay. The Evening Standard. Available at https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-news-latest-britain-against-leaving-eu-as-poll-of-polls-says-most-now-want-to-stay-a4257476.html.

  • Conservative Party. (2010). Invitation to Join the Government of Briatin: The Conservative Manifesto 2010. London: Conservative Policy Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservative Party. (2015). Strong Leadership, A Clear Economic Plan; A Bright More Secure Future. London: Conservative Policy Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, D. (2017, 9 January). Dominic Cummings: How the Brexit Referendum was Won. The Spectator. Available at https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/dominic-cummings-how-the-brexit-referendum-was-won.

  • Dinan, D. (2010). Ever Closer Union. An Introduction to European Integration. Boulder, CO: Lynne Ryenner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M., & J. Margo (eds.). (2006). Population Politics. London: Institute for Public Policy Research. Available at https://ippr.nvisage.uk.com/ecomm/files/population_politics.pdf.

  • Emerson, M. (2011). Britain, Ireland and Schengen: Time for a Smarter Bargain on Visas. CEPS Policy Brief, 249. Available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/148856201.pdf.

  • Fassi, E., & Lucarelli, S. (2021). The EU Migration System and Global Justice: An Assessment. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 259–277). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R., Jennings, W., & Somerville, W. (2015). Public Opinion, Responsiveness and Constraint: Britain’s Three Immigration Policy Regimes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(9), 1391–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, A. (2002). Euroscepticism in British Politics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G. (1994). Britain, the Deviant Case. In W. Cornelius, P. Martin, & J. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective (pp. 297–302). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedersdorf, C. (2018, April 23). Learning from 1968’s Leading Anti-Immigration Alarmist Enoch Powell Gave His Xenophobic Rivers of Blood Speech 50 Years ago—But the Lessons of Its Reception Still Apply Today. The Atlantic. Available at https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/04/learning-from-1968s-leading-anti-immigration-alarmist/558500/.

  • Gamble, A. (2018). Taking Back Control: The Political Implications of Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(8), 1215–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, A. (2005). Getting the Best of Both Worlds? Britain, the EU and Migration Policy. International Affairs, 81(4), 723–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, A., & Scholten, P. (2016). Britain: The Unexpected Europeanisation of Immigration. In A. Geddes & P. Scholten (Eds.), The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe (pp. 22–46). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins, J. (2014). Britain, Europe and National Identity: Self and Other in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, C., & Tournier-Sol, K. (2015). In K. Tournier-Sol & C. Gifford (Eds.), The EU Challenge of Europeanization: The Persistence of British Euroscepticism (pp. 1–16). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, D. (2012). Introduction. In Literature, Immigration, and Diaspora in Fin-de-Siècle England: A Cultural History of the 1905 Aliens Act (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139137102.001.

  • Grappi, G. (2021). France and Migration Between Logistification and Ethical Minimalism. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 147–171). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords European Union Committee. (2012). The EU’s Global Approach to Migration and Mobility: 8th Report of Session 2012–2013 (HL Paper 91). London: House of Lords.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, Y., & Howarth, A. (2018). Review of Humanitarian Refuge in the United Kingdom: Sanctuary, Asylum, and the Refugee Crisis. Politics and Policy, 46(3), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent. (2015, October 6). Theresa May’s Speech to the Conservative Party Conference. Available at https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-s-speech-to-the-conservative-party-conference-in-full-a6681901.html.

  • Innes, A. J. (2010). When the Threatened Become the Threat: The Construction of Asylum Seekers in British Media Narratives. International Relations, 24(4), 456–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeney, P. (2016). The European Union’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice Without the United Kingdom—Legal and Practical Consequences of Brexit. ELTE Law Journal, 1, 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (1999). Immigration and the Nation State: The United States, Germany and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karamanidou, L. (2021). Migration, Asylum Policy and Global Justice in Greece. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 89–117). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R., & Crowcroft, R. (2011). From Burke to Burkha: Conservatism, Multiculturalism and the Big Society. The Political Quarterly, 81(1), 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, E. (2004). Expansion and Restriction: Competing Pressures on United Kingdom Asylum Policy. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 18(2), 395–426. https://heinonline.org/HOL/AuthorProfile?base=js&search_name=Keyes,%20Elizabeth&1==1595304016.

  • Latour, V. (2014). The Securitisation of British Multiculturalism. In R. Garbaye & P. Schnapper (Eds.), The Politics of Ethnic Diversity on the British Isles (pp. 38–57). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lucarelli, S. (2021). The EU Migration System and Global Justice: An Introduction. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 1–32). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maughan, B. (2010). Tony Blair’s Asylum Policies: The Narratives and Conceptualisations at the Heart of New Labour’s Restrictionism, Working Paper Series, 69. Oxford: Oxford Department of International Development. Available at https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/files-1/wp69-tony-blairs-asylum-policies-2010.pdf.

  • May, T. (2016, 24 October). PM Commons statement on the European Council: 24 October 2016. Available at ​https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-commons-statement-on-the-european-council-24-oct-2016.

  • McGuinness, T. (2017). The UK Response to the Syrian Refugee Crisis (House of Commons Briefing Paper 06805). London: UK Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, C. (2017). They Don’t Look Like Children: Child Asylum-Seekers, the Dubs Amendment and the Politics of Childhood. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(11), 1757–1773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melegh, A., Vancsó, A., Mendly, D., & Hunyadi, M. (2020). Positional Insecurity and the Hungarian Migration Policy. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 173–197). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, G. (2010). When Policy Creates Politics: The Problematizing of Immigration and the Consequences for Refugee Integration in the UK. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(4), 437–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, E. D. H. (2021). Norway’s Approach to Migration and Asylum as a Non-EU State: Out, but Still In. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 199–224). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outhwaite, M. (2018). Migration Crisis and Brexit. In C. Menjívar, M. Ruiz, & I. Ness (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Migration Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190856908.013.7.

  • Partos, R., & Bale, T. (2015). Immigration and Asylum Policy Under Cameron’s Conservatives. British Politics, 10(2), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. (2007). Ethnic and Racial Segregation: A Critical Perspective. Geography Compass, 1(5), 1138–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portillo, M. (2014, November 7). Britain Has the Best of Both Worlds on the Fringes of Europe. The Financial Times. Available at https://www.ft.com/content/129c569a-64fc-11e4-ab2d-00144feabdc0.

  • Rogers, J. (2017, 14 February). There is Space for Lone Refugee Children in Britain, but the Government isn’t Trying to Find it. The Conversation. Available at https://theconversation.com/there-is-space-for-lone-refugee-children-in-britain-but-the-government-isnt-trying-to-find-it-72818.

  • Ryan, B. (2016). What Next for British Border Controls in Calais? The Conversation. Available at https://theconversation.com/what-next-for-british-border-controls-in-calais-64769.

  • Saggar, S., & Somerville, W. (2012). Building a British Model of Integration in an Era of Immigration: Policy Lessons for Government Reports. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, R. (2002). The Deserving and the Undeserving? Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Welfare in Britain. Critical Social Policy, 22(3), 456–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. (2015). Venues and Filters in Managed Migration Policy: The Case of the United Kingdom. International Migration Review, 51(2), 375–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretary of State for the Home Department. (2011). Report to Parliament on the Application of Protocols 19 and 21 to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in Relation to EU Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) Matters (1 December 2009—30 November 2010). Presentation to Parliament, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman-Zager, J. (2010). The Securitisation of Asylum: Protecting UK Residents (Working Paper Series No. 50), 1–31. Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. (2015). Britannia’s Embrace: Modern Humanitarianism and the Imperial Origins of Refugee Relief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., & Marmo, M. (2014). Race, Gender and the Body in British Immigration Control: Subject to Examination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, W., Sriskandarajah, D., & Latorre, M. (2009). United Kingdom: A Reluctant Country of Immigration. Migration Policy Institute Profile. Available at https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/united-kingdom-reluctant-country-immigration.

  • Spencer, S. (2011). The Migration Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spiering, M. (2004). British Euroscepticism. In R. Harmsen & M. Spiering (Eds.), Euroscepticism: Party Politics, National Identity and European Integration (pp. 127–149). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiering, M. (2015a). A Cultural History of British Euroscepticism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spiering, M. (2015b). The Essential Englishman: The Cultural Nature and Origins of British Euroscepticism. In K. Tournier-Sol & C. Gifford (Eds.), The UK Challenge to Europeanization: The Persistence of British Euroscepticism (pp. 17–32). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturge, G. (2020). Migration Statistics (House of Common Briefing Paper, No. CBP06077). London: UK Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilfold, S. (2015, 30 November). Britain, Immigration and Brexit. Centre for European Reform Bulletin. Available at https://www.cer.eu/publications/archive/bulletin-article/2015/britain-immigration-and-brexit.

  • UK Government. (2015, September 4). Syria Refugees: UK Government Response. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/syria-refugees-uk-government-response.

  • Vail, M. I. (2015). Between One-Nation Toryism and Neoliberalism: The Dilemmas of British Conservatism and Britain’s Evolving Place in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(1), 106–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Silva, C., & McNeil, R. (2017). The Net Migration Target and the 2017 Election. Oxford: Migration Observatory Commentary, COMPAS, University of Oxford. Available at https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Commentary-net-and-election17.pdf.

  • Vasilopoulou, S. (2016). UK Euroscepticism and the Brexit Referendum. The Political Quarterly, 87(2), 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vines, E. (2014). Reframing English Nationalism and Euroscepticism: From Populism to the British Political Tradition. British Politics, 9(3), 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, P. W. (2019). Migration to the UK: Asylum and Resettled Refugees. Oxford: Migration Observatory Briefing, COMPAS, University of Oxford. Available at https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Briefing-Migration-to-the-UK-Asylum-and-Resettled-Refugees.pdf.

  • Wellings, B., & Baxendale, H. (2015). Euroscepticism and the Anglosphere: Traditions and Dilemmas in Contemporary English Nationalism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(1), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A. (2020). Refugee Resettlement in the UK (House of Common Briefing Paper 8750). London: UK Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, M. (2015, March 5). Immigration Policies: General Election 2015 and How Each Party Will Tackle It. The Telegraph. Available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11451936/General-Election-2015-Immigration-policy.html.

  • Wintour, P. (2015, 3 September). Britain Should not Take more Middle East Refugees, Says David Cameron. The Guardian. Available at ​https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/02/david-cameron-migration-crisis-will-not-be-solved-by-uk-taking-in-more-refugees.

  • Wodak, R. (2018). We Have the Character of an Island Nation: A Discourse-Historical Analysis of David Cameron’s  Bloomberg Speech on the European Union. In M. Kranert & G. Horan (Eds.), Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse (pp. 27–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zotti, A. (2019). United Kingdom. In A. Zotti (Ed.), The European Migration System and Global Justice: ARENA Report 9/19. Available at https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-reports/2019/arena-report-9-19.html.

  • Zotti, A. (2021a). The Immigration Policy of The United Kingdom: British Exceptionalism and the Renewed Quest for Control. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 57–88). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zotti, A. (2021b). Germany’s ‘Atypical’ Leadership in the EU Migration System of Governance and its Normative Dimension. In M. Ceccorulli, E. Fassi & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The EU Migration System of Governance - Justice on the Move (pp. 225–258). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Zotti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zotti, A. (2021). The Immigration Policy of The United Kingdom: British Exceptionalism and the Renewed Quest for Control. In: Ceccorulli, M., Fassi, E., Lucarelli, S. (eds) The EU Migration System of Governance. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53997-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics