Skip to main content

Raya Dunayevskaya’s Concept of Dialectic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Raya Dunayevskaya's Intersectional Marxism

Part of the book series: Marx, Engels, and Marxisms ((MAENMA))

  • 445 Accesses

Abstract

Hudis and Anderson argue that the twenty-first century has experienced a revival of Marxist thought in many spheres, as well as important academic writings on Hegel. However, these two streams of thought have operated in separate spheres, since recent Marxist writing has avoided Hegel and dialectics, while academic writing on Hegel has avoided Marx and Marxism. They argue that Dunayevskaya’s writings can help to bridge this divide. In an essay that originally appeared as the introduction to Power of Negativity (2002), a posthumous collection of Dunayevskaya’s writings on the dialectic, Hudis and Anderson provide a brief intellectual biography of Dunayevskaya, stressing her work on the dialectic, but also touching on her theory of state capitalism and its relationship to a critique of Stalinism and fascism. They trace her key philosophical insight, Hegel’s absolute negativity as new beginning, from her earliest writings. Their discussion ranges from the 1953 Letters on Hegel’s Absolutes and Marxism and Freedom (1958), to her most deeply philosophical work, Philosophy and Revolution (1973), and to the writings she left in draft form at her death in 1987. In so doing, Hudis and Anderson show affinities and differences between Dunayevskaya’s concept of dialectic those of other Hegelian Marxists like Lenin, C. L. R. James, Marcuse, and Lukács. They draw still sharper contrasts between her work and that of Adorno, who rejected Hegel’s concept of negativity in favor of his version of “negative dialectics,” and of Derrida, whose deconstructionism attacked the entire dialectical tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, Theodor. 1973. Negative Dialectics, trans. by E. B. Ashton. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. “Aspects of Hegel’s Philosophy.” In Hegel: Three Studies, trans. by Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Kevin. 1995. Lenin, Hegel, and Western Marxism. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthold-Bond, Daniel. 1989. Hegel’s Grand Synthesis, a Study of Being, Thought and History. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokmeyer, Ron, Raya Dunayevskaya, et al. 1984. The Fetish of High Tech and Marx’s Unknown Mathematical Manuscripts. Chicago: News and Letters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1999. Introduction to a new edition of Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in 20th Century France. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, Dianne. 2000. Negativity and Politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1971. Positions, trans. by Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. “From Restricted to General Economy, a Hegelian Without Reserve.” In Writing and Difference, trans. by Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Glas, trans. by J. P. Leavey and R. Rand. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Specters of Marx, trans. by Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunayevskaya, Raya. 1944. “A New Revision of Marxian Economics.” American Economic Review 34(3): 531–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. The Raya Dunayevskaya Collection: Marxist-Humanism—A Half Century of Its World Development, on Deposit at Walter Reuther Archives of Labor History and Urban Affairs in Detroit, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Women’s Liberation and the Dialectics of Revolution. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989 [1973]. Philosophy and Revolution, from Hegel to Sartre and from Marx to Mao. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Rosa Luxemburg, Women’s Liberation, and Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution. Champaign Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. The Marxist-Humanist Theory of State-Capitalism: Selected Writings by Raya Dunayevskaya. Chicago: News and Letters.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. “May 1972 letter ‘On C.L.R. James’ Notes on Dialectics.’” Reprinted in News & Letters, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000 [1958]. Marxism and Freedom, from 1776 Until Today. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, Friedrich. 1990. Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy, Marx-Engels Collected Works, Vol. 26. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, trans. by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. 1969. Science of Logic, trans. by A. V. Miller. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, John H. 1996. The Presence of the Future in Hegel’s Logic. Rutherford: Associated University Presses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudis, Peter. 1995. “Labor, High-Tech Capitalism, and the Crisis of the Subject: A Critique of Recent Developments in Critical Theory.” Humanity and Society 19(4): 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. “Conceptualizing an Emancipatory Alternative: István Mészáros’ Beyond Capital.” Socialism and Democracy 11(1): 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudis, Peter and Kevin B. Anderson, eds. 2002. The Power of Negativity: Selected Writings on the Dialectic in Hegel and Marx. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. L. R. 1980. Notes on Dialectics, Hegel, Marx, Lenin. Westport, Connecticut: Lawrence Hill & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Fredric. 1997. “Interview with Fredric Jameson.” In Lukács After Communism, Interviews with Contemporary Intellectuals, edited by Eva L. Corredor. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannot, Thomas M. 1999. “Raya Dunayevskaya’s Conception of Ultimate Reality and Meaning.” Journal of Ultimate Reality and Meaning 22(4): 276–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Patricia Altenbernd. 1989. “Women’s Liberation: Following Dunayevskaya in Practicing Dialectics.” Quarterly Journal of Ideology 13(4): 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Douglas. 1984. Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, Georg. 1975. The Young Hegel, trans. by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1941. Reason and Revolution. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1958. “Critique of the Hegelian Dialectic.” In Marxism and Freedom by Raya Dunayevskaya. New York: Bookman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. “Critique of the Hegelian Dialectic.” In Marx and Engels, Collected Works, Vol. 3. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. Capital, Vol. I, trans. by Ben Fowkes. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Terry. 2001. “Dunayevskaya.” In Women Building Chicago, 1790–1990: A Bibliographical Dictionary, edited by Rima Luin Schultz and Adele Hast. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolapoulos, Toula and George Vassilacopoulos. 1999. Hegel and the Logical Structure of Love. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollman, Bertell. 1993. Dialectical Investigations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Andy and Raya Dunayevskaya. 1984. The Coal Miners’ General Strike of 1949–50 and the Birth of Marxist-Humanism in the U.S. Chicago: News and Letters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postone, Moishe. 1993. Time, Labor, and Social Domination. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockmore, Tom. 1992. Irrationalism: Lukács and the Marxist View of Reason. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin B. Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hudis, P., Anderson, K.B. (2021). Raya Dunayevskaya’s Concept of Dialectic. In: Anderson, K.B., Durkin, K., Brown, H.A. (eds) Raya Dunayevskaya's Intersectional Marxism. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53717-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics