Skip to main content

Co-designing Healthcare Services with Patients

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes

Abstract

Through an exploration of (a) the origins and evolution of co-design and (b) the recent application of related practices in the context of improving the quality of healthcare services we argue for closer attention to be paid to such activities within broader co-production processes. We draw a distinction between additive and transformative forms of co-production and highlight how co-design itself can be a transformative process. We suggest that contemporary studies of Experience-based Co-design in the healthcare sector may offer insights for the nature and impact of co-production in other sectors. These could particularly inform appropriate and robust forms of both summative and formative evaluation as well as highlighting potential benefits and risks from ‘scaling up’ co-design as an intervention to enhance the delivery of public services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, L.B. (1965). Systematic method for designers. London: Council of Industrial Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J.E. (1959). Creative engineering. In W.J. Clancey (Ed.), Creative engineering: Promoting innovation by thinking differently. Stanford Digital Repository. http://purl.stanford.edu/jb100vs5745. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  • Batalden, P. (2018). Getting more health from healthcare: Quality improvement must acknowledge patient coproduction—An essay by Paul Batalden. BMJ, 362, k3617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bate, S.P., & Robert, G. (2006). Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. BMJ Quality & Safety, 15(5), 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bate, S.P., & Robert, G. (2007). Bringing user experience to health care improvement: The concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.A. (2012) Agnostic participatory design: Working with marginalized social movements. Co-design Journal of Co-creation in Design and the Arts, 8(2–3), 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2013). We’re all in this together: Harnessing user and community co-production of public outcomes. In C. Staite (Ed.), Making sense of the future: Do we need a new model of public services? Birmingham: INLOGOV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, S., McSeveny, K., Lockley, E., et al. (2013). How was it for you? Experiences of participatory design in the UK health service. CoDesign, 9(4), 230–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.) (2018). Co-production and cocreation: Engaging citizens in public services. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, C., Cottam, H., Vanstone C., et al. (2006). RED paper 02: Transformation design. London: Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, E.S. (2000). No more throw-away people: The co-production imperative. Washington, DC: Essential Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, P., Mawson, S., & Wolstenholme, D. (2017). Service design in chronic health. In E. Tsekleves & R. Cooper (Eds.), Design for health. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., Jones, F., Harris, R., et al. (2017). What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open, 7, e014650. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, H., & Leadbeater, C. (2004). RED paper 01 health: Co-creating services. London: Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, P., Dieppe, S., Macintyre, S., et al. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. British Medical Journal, 337, 1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Design Council. (2019). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council’s evolved Double Diamond. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  • Design for Health & Wellbeing Lab. (2019). https://www.dhwlab.com/. Accessed 4 September 2019.

  • Di Russo, S. (2012). A brief history of design thinking: How design thinking came to ‘be’. Blog posted 8 June 2012. https://ithinkidesign.wordpress.com/page/1/. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  • Donetto, S., Pierri, P., Tsianakas, V., et al. (2015). Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: Realising participatory design in the public sector. The Design Journal, 18(2), 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, C. (2019). The Double Diamond, 15 years on. Blog posted 2 September 2019. https://medium.com/design-council/the-double-diamond-15-years-on-8c7bc594610e. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  • Dubberly, H. (2004). How do you design? A compendium of models. San Francisco, CA: Dubberly Design Office. Available at: http://www.dubberly.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/ddo_designprocess.pdf. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  • Dudau, A., Glennon, R., & Verschuere, B. (2019). Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1577–1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynos, J., & Speed, E. (2012). Varieties of co-production in public services: Time banks in a UK health policy context. Critical Policy Studies, 6(4), 402–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. (2003). Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grocott, P., Blackwell, R., Currie, C., et al. (2012). Co-producing novel wound care products for epidermolysis bullosa; An empirical case study of the use of surrogates in the design and prototype development process. International Wound Journal, 10, 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grocott, P., Graham, T., Blackwell, R., et al. (2013). Individualising wound care research: The Woundcare for Epidermolysis Bullosa Project. Wounds UK, 9(3), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Foundation. (2011). Evidence scan: Improvement Science. London: Health Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • HELIX Centre. (2019). https://helixcentre.com/our-work. Accessed 4 September 2019.

  • Holmlid, S. (2009). Participative, co-operative, emancipatory: From participatory design to service design. First Nordic conference on Service Design and Service Innovation. Oslo, 24–26 November 2009. Available at: http://servdes.org/pdf/2009/holmlid.pdf. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  • Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity & Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F., Gombert, K., Honey, S., et al. (in press). CREATE: Collaborative Rehabilitation Environments in Acute STrokE: An Experience-Based Co-Design Approach (EBCD) to improving activity experiences of stroke patients in four hospitals in England. Health Services and Delivery Research Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lab4Living. (2019). https://lab4living.org.uk/about/. Accessed 4 September 2019.

  • Langley, J., Wolstenholme, D., & Cooke, J. (2018). ‘Collective making’ as knowledge mobilisation: The contribution of participatory design in the co-creation of knowledge in healthcare. BMC Health Services Research, 18.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3397-y.

  • Locock, L., Robert, G., Boaz, A., et al. (2014). Testing accelerated experience-based co-design: A qualitative study of using a national archive of patient experience narrative interviews to promote rapid patient-centred service improvement. Health Services and Delivery Research Journal, 2(4), 1–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2016). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, 48, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, A. (2017). Products: Negotiating design within sceptical territory: Lessons for healthcare. In E. Tsekleves & R. Cooper (Eds.), Design for health. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, P., Davis, L.M., Turner, S., et al. (2019). Co-Design of Services for Health and Reentry (CO-SHARE): An Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) Pilot Study with Individuals Returning to Community from Jail and Service Providers in Los Angeles County. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2844.html. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  • Meroni, A., & Sangiorgi, D. (2011). Design for services. Farnham: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R., Burns, C., Vanstone, C., et al. (2005). RED report 01: Open health. London: The Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D., & Draper, S. (Eds.) (1986). User centred system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18, 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., & Whitaker, G. (1973). Does local community control of police make a difference? Some preliminary findings. American Journal of Political Science, 17(1), 48–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Parks, R.B., Whitaker, G.P., et al. (1978). The public service production process: A framework for analyzing police services. Policy Studies Journal, 7, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, V., Weavell, W., Callander, R., et al. (2018). The participatory Zeitgeist—Identification of mechanisms of change and the development of an explanatory theoretical model for a new era of healthcare quality improvement. Medical Humanities, 45, 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfannstiel, M.A., & Rasche, C. (Eds.) (2019). Service design and service thinking in healthcare and hospital management: Theory, concepts, practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Point of Care Foundation. (2019). EBCD: Experience-based co-design toolkit. https://www.pointofcarefoundation.org.uk/resource/experience-based-co-design-ebcd-toolkit/. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  • Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendiville, A. (2019). Service design methods: Knowledge co-production in health and social care. In M.A. Pfannstiel & C. Rasche. (Eds.), Service design and service thinking in healthcare and hospital management: Theory, concepts, practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Ed.) (2001). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. 1st Edition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, G., Cornwell, J., Locock, L., et al. (2015). Patients and staff as co-designers of health care services. British Medical Journal, 350, g7714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangiorgi, D., & Prendiville, A. (Eds.) (2017). Designing for service: Key issues and new directions. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangiorgi, D., Prendiville, A., & Ricketts, A. (2014). Mapping and developing service design research in the United Kingdom. London: University of the Arts London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.) (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siodmok, A. (2014). Designer policies. RSA Journal, 4, 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springham, N., & Robert, G. (2015). Experience based co-design reduces formal complaints on an acute mental health ward. BMJ Open Quality, 4.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209153.w3970.

  • Thomson, A., Rivas, C., & Giovanni, G. (2015). Multiple sclerosis outpatient future groups: Improving the quality of participant interaction and ideation tools within service improvement activities. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsekleves, E., & Cooper, R. (2017). Design for health. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsianakas, V., Robert, G., Richardson, A., et al. (2015). Enhancing the experience of carers in the chemotherapy outpatient setting: An exploratory randomised controlled trial to test the impact, acceptability and feasibility of a complex intervention co-designed by carers and staff. Supportive Care in Cancer, 23(10), 3069–3080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deventer, C., Robert, G., & Wright, A. (2016). Improving childhood nutrition and wellness in South Africa: Involving mothers/caregivers of malnourished or HIV positive children and health care workers as co-designers to enhance a local quality improvement intervention. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., & Tummers, L.G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17, 1333–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, O., Robert, G., Martin, G., et al. (2020). Is co-production just really good PPI? Making sense of patient and public involvement and co-production networks. In M. Bevir, & J. Waring (Eds.), Decentering Healthcare Networks. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, O., Sarre, S., Papoulias, C., et al. (2020). Lost in the shadows: Reflections on the dark side of co-production. Health Research Policy & Systems, 18, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn Robert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Robert, G., Donetto, S., Williams, O. (2021). Co-designing Healthcare Services with Patients. In: Loeffler, E., Bovaird, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics