Abstract
This chapter first introduces the critical agenda of the teacher research movement in the 1960s and 1970s which challenged the taken-for-granted position of teachers as mere technicians, consumers of academic research and implementers of other people’s ideas. This movement called for teachers’ emancipation as decision makers capable of engaging in research that brings valuable insights and nuanced and context-specific views into their classroom practice to contribute to their advancement and that of their schools and universities. Second, it discusses the ongoing debate on teachers’ lack of research engagement and lack of interest that both academic researchers and teachers show in their mutual work, as well as the gap between theory and practice that this situation has generated in language teacher education. Then, exploratory practice (EP), an innovative form of practitioner research (PR), is put forward to bridge this gap by empowering teachers to work alongside their learners as co-partners to understand better their practice. Finally, it provides the methodology and outcomes of a longitudinal language practitioner research (LPR) project conducted in England with the aim of enabling six neophyte language teacher researchers to implement EP in their classrooms. Their published narratives demonstrate that, given an appropriate model of development, teachers are able to contribute to their professional development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Reading
Slimani-Rolls, A., & Kiely, R. (2018). Exploratory practice for continuing professional development. An innovative approach for language teachers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
This book reports on a two year-long investigation of how a group of six three ELT and 3 MFL teachers developed their thinking and practices while implementing the principled framework of Exploratory Practice (EP) in their classrooms in collaboration with two researchers as facilitators in this process.
Hanks, J. (2017). Exploratory practice in language teaching. Puzzling about principles and practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
This book traces the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of the EP framework and uses case-studies, vignettes and narratives from teachers and learners across the world as they experience EP.
Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The Developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Allwright and Hanks supplement EP with five propositions about learners that they present as key developing practitioners of learning to enhance the classroom participants’ learning processes and enrich their human relationships.
Hall, G. (2017). Exploring English language teaching. Language in action (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
This book provides a single-volume introduction to the field of ELT from an applied linguistics perspective. It addresses four central themes in English language teaching: classroom interaction and management, “method, postmethod and methodology”; “learners”; and the “institutional frameworks and social contexts” of ELT, all of which are related to and help explain the emergence of EP.
References
Allwright, D. (2003). A brief guide to exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioners research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168803lr117oa
Allwright, D. (2005). From teaching points to learning opportunities. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 9–31.
Allwright, D. (2006). Six promising directions in applied linguistics. In S. Gieve & I. K. Miller (Eds.), Understanding the language classroom (pp. 11–17). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to exploratory practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Allwright, D., & Lenzuen, R. (1997). Exploratory practice: Work at the Cultura Inglesia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 73–79.
Allwright, D., & Miller, I. (2012). Burnout and the beginning teacher. In D. Soneson & E. Tarone (Eds.), Expanding horizons: Language teacher education in the 21st century (pp. 101–115). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Anwarudin, S. M. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with educational research: Toward a conceptual framework for locally-based interpretive communities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(40). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1776
Atay, D. (2006). Teachers’ professional development: Partnerships in research. TESL-EJ, 10(2), 1–14.
Ball, A. F. (2012). To know is not enough: Knowledge, power, and the zone of generativity. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 283–293.
Banister, C. (2018). Rebuilding practitioner self-efficacy through learner feedback. In A. Slimani-Rolls & K. Richard (Eds.), Exploratory practice for continuing professional development: An innovative approach for language teachers (pp. 135–151). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Breen, M. P. (2006). Collegial development in ELT: The interface between global processes and local understandings. In S. Gieve & I.K. Miller (Eds.), Understanding the language classroom (pp. 200–225). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Block, D. (2000). Revisiting the gap between SLA researchers and language teachers. Links & Letters, 7, 129–143.
Boreham, N. (2000). Collective professional knowledge. Medical Education, 34, 505–506.
Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391–429.
Brown, S. (2005). How can research inform ideas of good practice in teaching? The contributions of some official initiatives in the UK. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 383–406.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38(2), 57–74.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (Eds.). (1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes (Vol. 15). New York: Teachers College Press.
Clarke, M. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory-practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 9–26.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance. Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 130–144.
Czerniawsk, G., Guberman, A., & MacPhail, A. (2016). The professional developmental needs of higher education-based educators: An international comparative needs analysis. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 127–140.
Dagenais, C., Lysenko, L., Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Ramde, J., & Janosz, M. (2012). Use of research-based information by school practitioners and determinants of use: A review of empirical research. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of research, Debate and Practice, 8(3), 285–309.
Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
Donato, R. (2003). Action research. Retrieved from www.cal.org/resources/digest/digest_pdfs/0308donato.pdf
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, J., & Sarland, C. (1995). A study of “teachers as researchers” in the context of award-bearing courses and research degrees. British Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 371–385.
Ellis, R. (2010). Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language Teaching, 43(2), 182–201.
Foster, P. (1999). “Never mind the quality, feel the impact”: A methodological assessment of teacher research sponsored by the Teacher Training Agency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(4), 380–398.
Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research. From enquiry to understanding. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Gast, I., Schildkamp, K., & van der Veen, J. T. (2017). Team-based professional development intervention in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 736–767.
Gieve, S., & Miller, I. K. (2006). What do you mean by quality of life? In S. Gieve & I. K. Miller (Eds.), Understanding the language classroom (pp. 18–46). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goral, M. (2018). Insight into Learner Generated Materials. In Slimani-Rolls & R. Kiely (Eds.), Exploratory Practice for Continuing Professional Development: An Innovative Approach for Language Teachers (pp. 169–183). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hall, G. (2017). Exploring English language teaching: Language in action (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Hall, G. (2018). Theory, theories and practice in ELT: “Believing and doubting”. In J. Mackay, M. Birello, & D. Xerri (Eds.), ELT research in action. Bridging the gap between research and classroom practice. Faversham: IATEFL.
Hammersley, M. (1993). On the teacher as researcher. Educational Action Research, 1(3), 425–445.
Hanks, J. (2017). Exploratory practice in language teaching. Puzzling about principles and practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hanks, J. (2019). From research-as-practice to exploratory practice-as-research in language teaching and beyond. Language Teaching, 52(2), 143–187.
Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835–854.
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model P1. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.3
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practices: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 449–470.
Houghton, J. (2018). Gaining Deeper Understanding of Teaching Speaking from collaborative enquiry. In A. Slimani-Rolls, & R. Kiely, Exploratory practice for continuing professional development: An innovative approach for language teachers (pp. 153–167). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Huberman, M. (1996). Focus on research moving mainstream: Taking a closer look at teacher research. Language Arts, 73(2), 124–140.
Johnson, K. E. (2016). Language teacher education. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 121–134). Routledge.
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2002). Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: Emerging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27–48.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A handbook for teacher research: From design to implementation. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macaro, E. (2003). Second language teachers as second language researchers. Language Learning Journal, 27(1), 43–51.
Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Woore, R. (2016). Improving foreign language teaching: Towards a research-based curriculum and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
Marsden, E., & Kasprowicz, R. (2017). Foreign language educators’ exposure to research: Reported experiences, exposure via citations, and a proposal for action. The Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 613–642.
Martin, J., Sugarman, J., & Hickinbottom, S. (2010). Persons: Understanding psychological selfhood and agency. New York: Springer.
Medgyes, P. (2017). ELF is interesting for researchers but not important for teachers and learners. ELT Journal Debate, 51st Annual International IATEFL Conference and Exhibition, 4–7, 2017. Glasgow, UK.
Nassaji, H. (2012). The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 337–365.
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman.
Olson, M. W. (1990). The teacher as researcher: A historical perspective. In M. W. Olson (Ed.), Opening the door to classroom research (pp. 1–20). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Paran, A. (2017). Only connect: Teachers and researchers in dialogue. ELT Journal, 71(4), 499–508.
Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 589–618.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Prahbu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method—Why? TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161–176.
Rivers, W. (1981). Teaching foreign language skills (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Roberts, J. R. (1993). Evaluating the impacts of teacher research. System, 21(1), 1–19.
Rowland, L. (2011). Lessons about learning: Comparing learner experiences with language research. Langue Teaching Research, 15(20), 245–267.
Scherer, A., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.
Sharp, C. (2007). Making research make a difference. Teacher research: A small-scale study to look at impact. Chelmsford: Flare.
Slimani-Rolls, A. (2005). Rethinking task-based language learning: What we can learn from the learners. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 195–218.
Slimani-Rolls, A. (2009). Complexity and idiosyncrasy of classroom life. In T. Yoshida, H. Imai, Y. Nakata, A. Tajino, O. Takeuchi, & K. Tamai (Eds.), Researching language teaching and learning: An integration of practice and theory (pp. 57–75). Bern: Peter Lang.
Slimani-Rolls, A. (2019a). Exploratory practice: A way of opening access to research by classroom teachers and learners In A. Comas-Quinn, A. Beaven, & B. Sawhill, (Eds.), New case studies of openness in and beyond the language classroom (pp. 187–198). Research-Publishing.net.
Slimani-Rolls, A. (2019b). Modern language teacher identity formation through engagement with exploratory practice: The future will tell. In M. Gallardo (Ed.), Negotiating identity in modern foreign language teaching (pp. 117–141). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Slimani-Rolls, A., & Kiely, K. (2018). Exploratory practice for continuing professional development. An innovative approach for language teachers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Slimani-Rolls, A., & Kiely, R. (2014). We are the change we seek: Developing teachers’ understanding of the classroom practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 425–435.
Smith, P. (1970). A comparison of the cognitive and audio lingual approaches to foreign language instruction: The Pennsylvania foreign language project. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Curriculum Development.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Talmy, S. (2010). Critical research in applied linguistics. In B. Paltrigde & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 127–141). London: Continuum.
Tavakoli, P. (2015). Connecting research and practice in TESOL: A community of practice perspective. RELC Journal, 46(1), 37–52.
Tavakoli, P., & Howard, M. J. (2012). Teaching English to speakers of other languages teachers’ views on the relationship between research and practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 229–242.
Taylor, P. V. (1993). The text of Paulo Freire. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tudor, I. (2001). The dynamics of the language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Varghese, M. (2006). Bilingual teachers-in-the-making in Urbantown. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27(3), 211–224.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walburg, H. (1977). Decision and perception: New constructs for research on teaching effects. Cambridge Journal of Education, 7(1), 12–20.
Wedell, M., & Malderez, A. (2013). Understanding language classroom contexts: The starting point for change. Bloomsbury Academic.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zeichner, K. (2003). Teacher research as professional development for P-12 educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11(2), 301–326.
Zeichner, K., & Noffke, S. (2001). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 298–300). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Zeichner, K. M. (1995). Beyond the divide of teacher research and academic research. Teachers and teaching: Theory and practice, 1(2), 153–172.
Zembylas, M. (2003a). Emotions and teacher identity: A post-structural perspective. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 213–238.
Zembylas, M. (2003b). Interrogating “teacher identity”: Emotion, resistance, and self-formation. Educational Theory, 53, 107–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slimani-Rolls, A. (2020). Exploratory Practice for Language Learning and Teaching. In: Troudi, S. (eds) Critical Issues in Teaching English and Language Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53297-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53297-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53296-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53297-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)