Skip to main content

Imaging for Endometriosis in Adolescents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Endometriosis in Adolescents

Abstract

Imaging modalities should investigate in the adolescent and young women evidence for an endometrioma, the association with pouch of Douglas (POD) occlusion, and the rare but possible presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), and finally, the presence of adenomyosis is of particular importance. The systematic approach proposed by International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group includes four basic steps. The first step, a routine evaluation of uterus and adnexa aimed to identify the sonographic signs of adenomyosis and/or presence or absence of endometrioma. The typical ultrasonographic appearance of endometrioma is a cystic lesion with “ground glass” echogenicity, well defined from the surrounding ovarian parenchyma, with no papillary projections or vascularized solid areas. The accuracy of ultrasound is significant in young patients with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 97%. The second step includes evaluation of transvaginal sonographic “soft markers” (i.e., site-specific tenderness and ovarian mobility). The third step is an assessment of the status of pouch of Douglas using real-time ultrasound-based “sliding sign.” This sign is an easy method to assess pelvic adhesions and/or the presence of endometriosis in the posterior compartment and to assess the obliteration of POD. Finally, the fourth step is an assessment for deep infiltrating endometriosis nodules in anterior and posterior compartments. Based on a recent meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of TVS and MRI to assess DIE lesions in rectosigmoid, uterosacral ligaments, and rectovaginal septum seems to be similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 760. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Dysmenorrhea and endometriosis in the adolescent. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:e249–58.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D'Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al.; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):400–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Guideline Alliance (UK). Endometriosis: Diagnosis and Management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2017 (NICE Guideline, No. 73). http://nice.org.uk/guidance/ng73

  4. Arruda MS, Petta CA, Abrão MS, Benetti-Pinto CL. Time elapsed from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of endometriosis in a cohort study of Brazilian women. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:756–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dun EC, Kho KA, Morozov VV, Kearney S, Zurawin JL, Nezhat CH. Endometriosis in adolescents. JSLS. 2015;19(2) https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2015.00019.

  6. Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, d'Hooghe T, de Cicco Nardone F, de Cicco Nardone C, et al.; World Endometriosis Research Foundation Global Study of Women’s Health consortium. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:366–373.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wright KN, Laufer MR. Endometriomas in adolescents. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1529.e7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang M, Jiang W, Li G, Xu C. Ovarian masses in children and adolescents – an analysis of 521 clinical cases. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014;27:73–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee DY, Kim HJ, Yoon BK, Choi D. Clinical characteristics of adolescent endometrioma. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26:117–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Unger CA, Laufer MR. Progression of endometriosis in non-medically managed adolescents: a case series. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011;24:21–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Özyer S, Uzunlar Ö, Özcan N, Yeşilyurt H, Karayalçin R, Sargin A, et al. Endometriomas in adolescents and young women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26:176–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Y, Wang Y, Yang J, Wang S, Lang J. Adolescent endometriosis in China: a retrospective analysis of 63 cases. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25:295–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smorgick N, As-Sanie S, Marsh CA, Smith YR, Quint EH. Advanced stage endometriosis in adolescents and young women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014;27:320–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Audebert A, Lecointre L, Afors K, Koch A, Wattiez A, Akladios C. Adolescent endometriosis: report of a series of 55 cases with a focus on clinical presentation and long-term issues. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:834–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Janssen EB, Rijkers AC, Hoppenbrouwers K, Meuleman C, D'Hooghe TM. Prevalence of endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy in adolescents with dysmenorrhea or chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:570–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brosens I, Gordts S, Habiba M, Benagiano G. Uterine cystic adenomyosis: a disease of younger women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28:420–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Itam SP 2nd, Ayensu-Coker L, Sanchez J, Zurawin RK, Dietrich JE. Adenomyosis in the adolescent population: a case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009;22:e146–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dietrich JE. An update on adenomyosis in the adolescent. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:388–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meredith SM, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:107.e1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:1374–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T, Valentin L, Leone FP, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:318–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ho ML, Ratts V, Merritt D. Adenomyotic cyst in an adolescent girl. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009;22:e33–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Branquinho MM, Marques AL, Leite HB, Silva IS. Juvenile cystic adenomyoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;19:2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Mais V, Risalvato A, Lai MP, Melis GB. The diagnosis of endometriomas using colour Doppler energy imaging. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1691–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alcázar JL, León M, Galván R, Guerriero S. Assessment of cyst content using mean gray value for discriminating endometrioma from other unilocular cysts in premenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:228–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Guerriero S, Savelli L, Paladini D, Lissoni AA, et al. Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:730–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guerriero S, Spiga S, Ajossa S, Peddes C, Perniciano M, Soggiu B, et al. Role of imaging in the management of endometriosis. Minerva Ginecol. 2013;65:143–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Pilloni M, Ajossa S, Olartecoechea B, Sedda F, et al. Reproducibility of two different methods for performing mean gray value evaluation of cyst content in endometriomas using VOCAL. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2014;41:325–32.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saba L, Sulcis R, Melis GB, de Cecco CN, Laghi A, Piga M, et al. Endometriosis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol. 2015;56:355–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alcázar JL. Ovarian Endometriosis. In: Guerriero S, Condous G, Alcázar JL, editors. How to Perform Ultrasonography in Endometriosis. Berlin: Springer; 2018. p. 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ata B, Uncu G. Impact of endometriomas and their removal on ovarian reserve. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:235–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hamdan M, Dunselman G, Li TC, Cheong Y. The impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:809–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Somigliana E, Benaglia L, Paffoni A, Busnelli A, Vigano P, Vercellini P. Risks of conservative management in women with ovarian endometriomas undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:486–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guerriero S, Van Calster B, Somigliana E, Ajossa S, Froyman W, De Cock B, et al. Age-related differences in the sonographic characteristics of endometriomas. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1723–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Garau N, Alcazar JL, Mais V, Melis GB. Diagnosis of pelvic adhesions in patients with endometrioma: the role of transvaginal ultrasonography. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:742–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nezhat C, Santolaya J, Nezhat FR. Comparison of transvaginal sonography and bimanual pelvic examination in patients with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;1(2):127–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Welander CE, Benigno B. Four ovarian cancers diagnosed during laparoscopic management of 1011 women with adnexal masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:790–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Staettner S, Tammaa A, Tinelli A, Sparic R, et al. Uterine sliding sign: a simple sonographic predictor for presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:692–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Reid S, Lu C, Casikar I, Reid G, Abbott J, Cario G, et al. Prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration in women with suspected endometriosis using a new real-time dynamic transvaginal ultrasound technique: the sliding sign. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:685–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Gerada M, D'Aquila M, Piras B, Melis GB. “Tenderness-guided” transvaginal ultrasonography: a new method for the detection of deep endometriosis in patients with chronic pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1293–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Guerriero S, Alcázar JL, Ajossa S, Pilloni M, Melis GB. Three-dimensional sonographic characteristics of deep endometriosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1061–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Guerriero S, Saba L, Ajossa S, Peddes C, Angiolucci M, Perniciano M, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1189–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Guerriero S, Pilloni M, Alcazar JL, Sedda F, Ajossa S, Mais V, et al. Tissue characterization using mean gray value analysis in deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:459–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pascual MA, Guerriero S, Hereter L, Barri-Soldevila P, Ajossa S, Graupera B, et al. Diagnosis of endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum using introital three-dimensional ultrasonography. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2761–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Orozco R, Perniciano M, Jurado M, Melis GB, et al. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in the rectosigmoid: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:281–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Minguez JA, Jurado M, Mais V, Melis GB, et al. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in uterosacral ligaments, rectovaginal septum, vagina and bladder: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:534–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Guerriero S, Saba L, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Rodriguez I, Mais V, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:586–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Guerriero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Cystic adenomyosis (AVI 1204 kb)

Multiple endometriomas with adhesions to the uterus (AVI 17356 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guerriero, S. et al. (2020). Imaging for Endometriosis in Adolescents. In: Nezhat, C.H. (eds) Endometriosis in Adolescents. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52984-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52984-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52983-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52984-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics