Abstract
Frame choice generally affects readers’ evaluations: objects or events framed positively are evaluated more positively than objects or events described negatively (Levin and Gaeth 1988; Holleman and Pander Maat 2009). This so-called “valence-consistent shift” is an important rhetorical resource: speakers may steer hearer inferences and evaluations just by choosing a particular attribute frame. Moreover, the framing choice in utterances as this glass is half empty seems to affect inferences about “previous states”, that is about the change leading to the current state of affairs. This chapter replicates and extends the experimental work on these previous state inferences. Furthermore, it explores the mechanisms behind this framing effect. Experiment 1 provides a Dutch replication of the seminal study by Sher and McKenzie (2006) on half full and half empty cups. It confirms the role of prior state reference points in frame interpretation: half full tends to be comprehended as “fuller than before”, while half empty is seen as “emptier than before”. Our experiment 2 constitutes a conceptual replication of the first study, using a variety of written scenarios and a variety of descriptors different from full and empty. Once more, the framed component tends to be taken to have increased over time. In closing, we relate the results to the notion of reference points and to the concept of argumentative orientation. More specifically, we propose that the reference point idea instantiates a more general principle of argumentative orientation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(4), 335–359.
Doury, M., van Haaften, T., & Henkemans, F. S. (2011). Strategic maneuvering in critical reactions to pragmatic argumentation. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 21–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ducrot, O. (1980). Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
Ducrot, O. (1996). Slovenian lectures (Ed. Igor Ž. Žagar; transl. Sebastian McEvoy). Ljubljana: ISH Inštitut za humanistične študije Ljubljana.
Geerligs, S. (2009). Kiezen mensen altijd voor de verbetering? Een onderzoek naar het effect van de toegenomen proportie bij actuele interpretatietaken [Do people always choose the improvement? A study into the effects of the increasing proportion in actual interpretation tasks]. Bachelor’s Thesis Communication and Information Sciences, Utrecht University.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (vol. 3). Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gosens, D. (2006). Halfvol of halfleeg??? Een onderzoek naar het effect van framing op de keuze uit twee mogelijkheden [Half-full or half-empty??? A study into the effect of framing on the choice between two options]. BA Thesis Communication and Information Sciences, Utrecht University.
Holleman, B. C., & Pander Maat, H. (2009). The pragmatics of profiling: Framing effects in text interpretation and text production. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2204–2221.
Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2018). News framing effects: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Lehrer, A. (1985). Markedness and antonymy. Journal of Linguistics, 21(2), 397–429.
Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374–378.
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149–188.
Liebrecht, C., Hustinx, L., & van Mulken, M. (2019). The relative power of negativity: The influence of language intensity on perceived strength. Journal Of Language and Social Psychology, 38(2), 170–193.
McKenzie, C. R. M., & Nelson, J. D. (2003). What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 596–602.
McKenzie, C. R. M., Ferreira, V. S., Mikkelsen, L. A., McDermott, K. J., & Skrable, R. P. (2001). Do conditional hypotheses target rare events? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 291–309.
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2018). The enigma of reason: A new theory of human understanding. Penguin books.
Myachykov, A., Garrod, S., & Scheepers, C. (2009). Attention and syntax in sentence production: A critical review. Discours, 4. http://discours.revues.org/7594.
Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.
Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Publishers.
Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2006). Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition, 101, 467–494.
Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. (2011). Levels of information: A framing hierarchy. Perspectives on framing, 35.
Tomlin, R. S. (1997). Mapping conceptual representations into linguistic representations: The role of attention in grammar. In J. Nuyts & E. Pederson (Eds.), Language and conceptualization (pp. 162–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van de Geer, F. (2008). Dertig procent vrouw, zeventig procent man [Thirty percent women, seventy percent men]. MA Thesis Communication Sciences, Utrecht University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holleman, B., Pander Maat, H. (2021). Empty Is Emptied: How Frame Choice Affects Previous State Inferences. In: Boogaart, R., Jansen, H., van Leeuwen, M. (eds) The Language of Argumentation. Argumentation Library, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52906-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52907-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)