Abstract
There is no standard approach to performing an ultrasound study. However, there are images which every study should document. The order in which the sonographer acquires these images assures consistency and ease of readability for the reviewer. I am a vocal proponent of developing an approach and sticking with it. This is especially important in a large practice with many sonographers. Once a protocol is developed, it needs to be codified in a written document. As changes are needed, the document is updated with the date of the revision and possibly the reason for the revision. All sonographers will then need to be re-educated.
This chapter describes a urologist’s view of what a complete ultrasound evaluation of the primary organs of interest for the urologist should include. I have incorporated the requirements of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) to assure those interested in AIUM Urology Practice Accreditation, as well as meeting the ever-escalating requirements of third-party payers, that use of these protocols will meet their requirements. As the urologist becomes an expert sonographer, changes to the protocol will inevitably occur; however, my hope is that this chapter will serve as a working primer that will help a urologist sonographer acquire and document high-quality studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AIUM Practice Guideline for Documentation of an Ultrasound Examination, AIUM practice guidelines.
AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of an Ultrasound Examination in the Practice of Urology, The American Institute for Ultrasound in Medicine, November 5, 2011.
Health Insurance and Portability Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).
HiTech Act of 2009, Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, Federal Register, 74(79), Monday, April 27, 2009.
Federal Drug Administration, Code of Federal regulations Title 21 CFR, Part 1270 subpart C, Procedures and Records.
Biagiotti G, et al. Spermatogenesis and spectral echo-color Doppler traces from the main testicular artery. BJU Int. 2002;90(9):903–8.
Unsal A, et al. Resistance and pulsatility index increase in capsular branches of testicular artery: indicator of impaired testicular microcirculation in varicocele? J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35(4):191–5.
Pinggera GM, et al. Assessment of the intratesticular resistive index by colour Doppler ultrasonography measurements as a predictor of spermatogenesis. BJU Int. 2008;101(6):722–6.
Balci A, et al. Long-term effect of varicocele repair on intratesticular arterial resistance index. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008;36(3):148–52.
Hillelsohn JH, et al. Spectral Doppler sonography: a non-invasive method for predicting dyspermia. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(32):1427–32.
Herati A, et al. Evaluation of impaired spermatogenesis with spectral Doppler ultrasound: correlation with testicular biopsy., MP68-17. J Urol. 2014;2:2196.
Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Acute renal failure: possible role of duplex Doppler US in distinction between acute prerenal failure and acute tubular necrosis. Radiology. 1991;179(2):419–23.
Platt JF. Duplex Doppler evaluation of native kidney dysfunction: obstructive and nonobstructive disease. 1992;158(5):1035–42. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.158.5.1566663.
Onur MR, Poyraz AK, Bozgeyik Z, Onur AR, Orhan I. Utility of semiquantitative strain elastography for differentiation between benign and malignant solid renal masses. 2015;34(4):639–47. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.34.4.639.
Tan S, Özcan MF, Tezcan F, Balci S, Karaoğlanoğlu M, Huddam B, Arslan H. Real-time elastography for distinguishing angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: preliminary observations. 2013;200(4):W369–75. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9139.
Ozkan F, Yavuz YC, Inci MF, Altunoluk B, Ozcan N, Yuksel M, Sayarlioglu H, Dogan E. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography in transplant kidneys: correlations with clinical-Doppler parameters. 2013;39(1):4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.09.013.
Boehm K, Salomon G, Beyer B, Schiffmann J, Simonis K, Graefen M, Budaeus L. Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols. J Urol. 2015;193(3):794–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.100.
Postema A, Mischi M, de la Rosette J, Wijkstra H. Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review. 2015;33(11):1651–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1523-6.
Dabaja AA, Wosnitzer MS, Mielnik A, Bolyakov A, Schlegel PN, Paduch DA. Bulbocavernosus muscle area measurement: a novel method to assess androgenic activity. Asian J Androl. 2014;16(4):618–22.
Manieri C, Carter S, Romano G, Trucchi A, et al. The diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in men by ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness. J Urol. 1998;159(3):761–5.
Chia SJ, Heng CT, Chan SP, Foo KT. Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2003;91(4):371–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A
Appendix A
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilbert, B.R. (2021). Urologic Ultrasound Protocols. In: Fulgham, P.F., Gilbert, B.R. (eds) Practical Urological Ultrasound. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52309-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52309-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52308-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52309-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)