Skip to main content

LockChain Technology as One Source of Truth for Cyber, Information Security and Privacy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing (SAI 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1230))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Implementing and maintaining Information Security (IS) in a digitized ecosystem is cumbersome. Multiple complex frameworks and models are used to implement IS, but these are perceived as hard to implement and maintain in digitized dynamic value chains and platforms. Most companies still use spreadsheets to design, direct and monitor their information security function and demonstrate their compliance. Regulators too use spreadsheets for supervision. This paper reflects on longitudinal Design Science Research (DSR) on IS and describes the design and engineering of an artefact architecture, coined as LockChain, which can emancipate boards from silo-based spreadsheet management and improve their visibility, control and assurance via integrated dash-boarding and a reporting tool. LockChain is not a traditional Information Security Management System (ISMS) but is used for the design and specification of information security requirements and measures and privacy requirements. We elaborate “Why” we used Design Science Research into valorisation of the concept of LockChain, we explain “What” we have established in terms of the technology of LockChain and “How” it is applied and the added value LockChain brings for companies on cost savings, Security and Privacy by Design engineering culture and Digital Assurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ponemon: Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis. Ponemon Institute LLC, United States (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conti, M., Dehghantanha, A., Franke, K., Watson, S.: Internet of Things security and forensics: challenges and opportunities. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. Int. J. eSci. 78, 544–546 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cashell, B., Jackson, W., Jickling, M., Webel, B.: The Economic Impact of Cyber-Attacks. Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, United States (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. ITGI: Information Risks; Who’s Business are they? IT Governance Institute, United States (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hubbard, D.: The Failure of Risk Management. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bobbert, Y.: Improving the Maturity of Business Information Security: On the Design and Engineering of a Business Information Security Administrative Tool. Radboud University, Nijmegen (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yaokumah, W., Brown, S.: An empirical examination of the relationship between information security/business strategic alignment and information security governance. J. Bus. Syst. Gov. Ethics 2(9), 50–65 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zitting, D.: Are You Still Auditing in Excel? Sarbanes Oxley Compliance J. (2015). http://www.s-ox.com/dsp_getFeaturesDetails.cfm?CID=4156

  9. Flores, W., Antonsen, E., Ekstedt, M.: Information security knowledge sharing in organizations: investigating the effect of behavioral information security governance and national culture. Comput. Secur. 2014–43, 90–110 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Niekerk, J., Von Solms, R.: Information security culture: a management perspective. Comput. Secur. 29(4), 476–486 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seale, C.: Researching Society and Culture, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004). ISBN 978-0-7619-4197-2

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/IEC27001:2013: ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information technology – Security techniques – Information security management systems – Requirements. ISO/IEC, Geneva (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cherdantseva, Y., Hilton, J.: A reference model of information assurance & security. In: IEEE Proceedings of ARES, vol. SecOnt Workshop, Regensburg, Germany (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. GOV.UK: The Security Policy Framework (SPF). Statement of Assurance questionnaire in Excel - Gov.uk

  15. Halkyn: ISO27001 Self Assessment Checklist hits record downloads, 19 February 2015

    Google Scholar 

  16. ISF: Corporate Governance Requirements for Information Risk Management. Information Security Forum, UK

    Google Scholar 

  17. von Solms, S., von Solms, R.: Information Security Governance. Springer, New York (2009). ISBN 978 0 387 79983 4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Omari, A., El-Gayar, O., Deokar, A.: Information security policy compliance: the role of information security awareness. In: Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems, US (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Omari, A., El-Gayar, O., Deokar, A.: Security policy compliance: user acceptance perspective. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stackpole, B., Oksendahl, E.: Security Strategy. Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., Guldentops, E.: Structures, processes and relational mechanisms for IT governance. In: Strategies for Information Technology Governance, pp. 1–36. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. ISACA: COBIT5 for Information Security, United States: Information Systems Audit and Control Association, ISACA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Visser, J.: Building Maintainable Software. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khan, J.: The need for continuous compliance, pp. 14–15, June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  25. Forsgren, N., Humble, J.K.G.: Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps: Building and Scaling High Performing Technology Organizations. Lean IT Strategies LLC, Portland, Oregon (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. ITGI: COBIT Mapping: Mapping of CMMI for Development V1.2 With COBIT. IT Governance Institute, ISBN 1-933284-80-3, United States of America (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Koning, E.: Assessment Framework for DNB Information Security Examination. De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Powell, S., Baker, K., Lawson, B.: Errors in operational spreadsheets. J. Organ. End User Comput. 21(3), 24–36 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Volchkov, A.: How to measure security from a governance perspective. ISACA J. 5, 44–51 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Papazafeiropoulou, A.: Understanding governance, risk and compliance information systems the experts view. Inf. Syst. Front. 18(6), 1251–1263 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Deloitte: Spreadsheet Management, Not what you figured (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bobbert, Y., Mulder, J.: Enterprise engineering in business information security. A case study & expert validation in security, risk and compliance artefact engineering. A comparative analysis of a security measurement tool. In: EEWC 2018. LNBIP, vol. 334, pp. 1–25. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Johannesson, P., Perjons, E.: An Introduction to Design Science. Springer, Cham (2014). Stockholm University

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Wieringa, R.: Design science as nested problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bass, L., Holz, R., Rimba, P., Tran, B., Zhu, L.: Securing a deployment pipeline. In: 3rd International Workshop on Release Engineering. IEEE ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. COSO: Leveraging COSO Across the Three Lines of Defense. The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), United States (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  38. McKinsey: Disruptive technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. The McKinsey Global Institute (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Silic, M., Back, A.: Shadow IT – a view from behind the curtain. Comput. Secur. 45, 274–283 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bobbert, Y.: Maturing Business Information Security. IBISA, Utrecht (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Humble, J., Farley, D.: Continuous Delivery. Pearson Education Inc., New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bobbert, Y.: Defining a research method for engineering a Business Information Security artefact. In: Proceedings of the Enterprise Engineering Working Conference (EEWC) Forum, Antwerp (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuri Bobbert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bobbert, Y., Ozkanli, N. (2020). LockChain Technology as One Source of Truth for Cyber, Information Security and Privacy. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Intelligent Computing. SAI 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1230. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52243-8_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics