Abstract
This chapter reports on a transdisciplinary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project in a UK secondary school where students (aged 15–18 years) designed and constructed several heavyweight robots. Given the current concerns about student participation in STEM learning and meeting future workplace demands for STEM-related careers, this study aimed to investigate factors influencing the STEM beliefs and practices of school-aged students. In-depth interviews with 12 students investigated their STEM beliefs and experiences over a year as they built several electro-mechanical robots. The results revealed shifting perceptions of STEM, making reciprocal connections between STEM project learning and individual subject study, and enhanced use of cognitive processes. The study sought to better understand how integrated STEM experiences influenced students’ STEM beliefs, broadened their subject choices and career aspirations, and enhanced future engagement in STEM-related activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., King, H., Mau, A., Nomikou, E. & Seakins, A.J. (2016). Science capital made clear [online]. Retrieved from https://www.stem.org.uk/sites/default/files/pages/downloads/Science-Capital-Made-Clear.pdf
Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the challenge. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102–112.
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2018). Forging our future—The story so far. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forging-our-future-industrial-strategy-the-story-so-far
Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 3, and 5 framework document. Retrieved April 28, 2017 from, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-secondary-curriculum (https://www.gov.uk/national-curriculum/key-stage-3-and-4).
Department for Education. (2015). The national curriculum in England, design and technology: GCE AS and A level subject content. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gce-as-and-a-level-design-and-technology
English, L. (2016). STEM education K–12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
English, L. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, (Suppl 1), S5–S24.
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J. M., Minniti, L., & White, B. J. G. (2017). Computational thinking, Grade 1 students and the binomial theorem. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3, 77–96.
Hallström, J., & Ankiewicz, P. (2019). Laying down the “T” and “E” in STEM education: Design as the basis of an integrated STEM philosophy. In S. Pulé & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), Proceedings PATT 37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education (pp. 187–194). Msida: University of Malta.
Havice, W., Havice, P., Waugaman, C., & Walker, K. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of integrative STEM education: Teacher and administrator professional development. Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 73–90.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Li, Y., Shoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., et al. (2019). On thinking and STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00014-x
Mohr-Schroeder, M., Cavalcanti, M., & Blyman, K. (2015). STEM education understanding the changing landscape. In A. Sahin (Ed.), A practice based model of STEM teaching (pp. 3–14). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Morgan, R., & Kirby, C. (2016). The UK STEM education landscape. London: Royal Academy of Engineering Education and Skills Committee. Retrieved from https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/uk-stem-education-landscape
Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Context, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221–223.
National Audit Office. (2018). Delivering STEM Skills for the Economy. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Delivering-STEM-Science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-skills-for-the-economy.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). PISA 2015 results: Vol. V. Collaborative problem solving. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en
Oldknow, A. (2016). The iSTEM+ approach: a strategy for schools to prepare today’s students for the world of tomorrow [online]. The Centre for Innovation in Technological Education in Cambridge. Retrieved from https://www.stem.org.uk/community/groups/99628/istem
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.
Roberts, G. (2002). Get SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. London: UK Government.
Sainsbury, D. (2007). The race to the top HMSO. Retrieved from http://www.rsc.org/images/sainsbury_review051007_tcm18-103118.pdf
Skilling, K. (2019). Shifting and shaping student STEM beliefs: learning from a transdisciplinary robot project. In 5th International Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in Education Conference (STEM 2018), Queensland: Queensland University of Technology. STEM Learning UK. Retrieved from https://www.stem.org.uk/about-us
Skilling, K., Bobis, J., Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., & Way, J. (2016). What secondary teachers think and do about student engagement in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(4), 545–566.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Consideration for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34.
Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407.
Tang, K. S., & Williams, P. J. (2018). STEM literacy or literacies? Examining the empirical basis of these constructs. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.362
The Committee of Public Accounts. (2018, June 13), Delivering STEM skills for the economy, HC 691 2018-06. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubacc/691/691.pdf
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., et al. (2018). Integrated STEM education: a systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–12.
Tomei, A., Dawson, E. & Dillon, J. (2013, 10–16 December/January). A study of science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in the United Kingdom (Unpublished).
Vasquez, J. (2014/2015, 10–16 December/January). STEM: beyond the acronym Educational Leadership, 72 4 10-15
Wong, V., Dillon, J., & King, H. (2016). STEM in England: meanings and motivations in the policy arena. International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2346–2366.
Ziaeefard, S., Miller, M. H., Rastgaar, M., & Mahmoudian, N. (2017). Co-robotics hands-on activities: A gateway to engineering design and STEM learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems., 97, 40–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skilling, K. (2020). Student STEM Beliefs and Engagement in the UK: How They Shift and Are Shaped Through Integrated Projects. In: Anderson, J., Li, Y. (eds) Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. Advances in STEM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52228-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52229-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)