Skip to main content

Student STEM Beliefs and Engagement in the UK: How They Shift and Are Shaped Through Integrated Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrated Approaches to STEM Education

Part of the book series: Advances in STEM Education ((ASTEME))

Abstract

This chapter reports on a transdisciplinary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project in a UK secondary school where students (aged 15–18 years) designed and constructed several heavyweight robots. Given the current concerns about student participation in STEM learning and meeting future workplace demands for STEM-related careers, this study aimed to investigate factors influencing the STEM beliefs and practices of school-aged students. In-depth interviews with 12 students investigated their STEM beliefs and experiences over a year as they built several electro-mechanical robots. The results revealed shifting perceptions of STEM, making reciprocal connections between STEM project learning and individual subject study, and enhanced use of cognitive processes. The study sought to better understand how integrated STEM experiences influenced students’ STEM beliefs, broadened their subject choices and career aspirations, and enhanced future engagement in STEM-related activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., King, H., Mau, A., Nomikou, E. & Seakins, A.J. (2016). Science capital made clear [online]. Retrieved from https://www.stem.org.uk/sites/default/files/pages/downloads/Science-Capital-Made-Clear.pdf

  • Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the challenge. Abingdon, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2018). Forging our future—The story so far. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/forging-our-future-industrial-strategy-the-story-so-far

  • Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 3, and 5 framework document. Retrieved April 28, 2017 from, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-secondary-curriculum (https://www.gov.uk/national-curriculum/key-stage-3-and-4).

  • Department for Education. (2015). The national curriculum in England, design and technology: GCE AS and A level subject content. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gce-as-and-a-level-design-and-technology

  • English, L. (2016). STEM education K–12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, (Suppl 1), S5–S24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J. M., Minniti, L., & White, B. J. G. (2017). Computational thinking, Grade 1 students and the binomial theorem. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3, 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallström, J., & Ankiewicz, P. (2019). Laying down the “T” and “E” in STEM education: Design as the basis of an integrated STEM philosophy. In S. PulĂ© & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), Proceedings PATT 37: Developing a knowledge economy through technology and engineering education (pp. 187–194). Msida: University of Malta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havice, W., Havice, P., Waugaman, C., & Walker, K. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of integrative STEM education: Teacher and administrator professional development. Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Shoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., et al. (2019). On thinking and STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00014-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr-Schroeder, M., Cavalcanti, M., & Blyman, K. (2015). STEM education understanding the changing landscape. In A. Sahin (Ed.), A practice based model of STEM teaching (pp. 3–14). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R., & Kirby, C. (2016). The UK STEM education landscape. London: Royal Academy of Engineering Education and Skills Committee. Retrieved from https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/uk-stem-education-landscape

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Context, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office. (2018). Delivering STEM Skills for the Economy. London: Author. Retrieved from https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Delivering-STEM-Science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-skills-for-the-economy.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). PISA 2015 results: Vol. V. Collaborative problem solving. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en

  • Oldknow, A. (2016). The iSTEM+ approach: a strategy for schools to prepare today’s students for the world of tomorrow [online]. The Centre for Innovation in Technological Education in Cambridge. Retrieved from https://www.stem.org.uk/community/groups/99628/istem

  • Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. (2002). Get SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. London: UK Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, D. (2007). The race to the top HMSO. Retrieved from http://www.rsc.org/images/sainsbury_review051007_tcm18-103118.pdf

  • Skilling, K. (2019). Shifting and shaping student STEM beliefs: learning from a transdisciplinary robot project. In 5th International Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in Education Conference (STEM 2018), Queensland: Queensland University of Technology. STEM Learning UK. Retrieved from https://www.stem.org.uk/about-us

  • Skilling, K., Bobis, J., Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., & Way, J. (2016). What secondary teachers think and do about student engagement in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(4), 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Consideration for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K. S., & Williams, P. J. (2018). STEM literacy or literacies? Examining the empirical basis of these constructs. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.362

  • The Committee of Public Accounts. (2018, June 13), Delivering STEM skills for the economy, HC 691 2018-06. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubacc/691/691.pdf

  • Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., et al. (2018). Integrated STEM education: a systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomei, A., Dawson, E. & Dillon, J. (2013, 10–16 December/January). A study of science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in the United Kingdom (Unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, J. (2014/2015, 10–16 December/January). STEM: beyond the acronym Educational Leadership, 72 4 10-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, V., Dillon, J., & King, H. (2016). STEM in England: meanings and motivations in the policy arena. International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2346–2366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziaeefard, S., Miller, M. H., Rastgaar, M., & Mahmoudian, N. (2017). Co-robotics hands-on activities: A gateway to engineering design and STEM learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems., 97, 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Skilling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Skilling, K. (2020). Student STEM Beliefs and Engagement in the UK: How They Shift and Are Shaped Through Integrated Projects. In: Anderson, J., Li, Y. (eds) Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. Advances in STEM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52228-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52229-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics