Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling Business Process and Events

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Algorithms in Software Engineering (CSOC 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1224))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Business processes (BPs) are nowadays essential elements and key assets in any commercial organization. Additionally, BP matters are important issues in the context of enterprise computing. Business process management (BPM) is the main research area for process-aware systems involving methodologies, models, and supporting tools for process design, execution, and monitoring. BPM offers many challenges for software developers, including process specification and documentation. This paper is about (operational) BPs (e.g., procurement, hiring a new employee, supply chain management, request for leave), with a focus on modeling BPs in which all sub-processes, activities, data flows, inputs, and outputs, together with their relationships with each other, are identified and described. Typically, the focus of traditional process modeling is persistently on diagrammatic tools to design process notations (e.g., UML and BPMN). In this paper, we adopt a diagrammatic modeling methodology called the Thinging Machine (TM) and use it as a base to promote understanding of notions of BPs by offering a new perspective that captures a system’s dynamic behavior based on its events. The TM emphasizes a single unifying ontological element: the thing/machine concept (thimac), in contrast to object- or process-oriented methodologies. TM-based modeling can be a valuable tool in the general area of BPM. We partially demonstrate that by applying it to document two actual administrative systems. The resultant conceptual descriptions reflect a well-defined approach to the notions of processes and events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yan, Z., Mazzara, M., Cimpian, E., Urbanec, A.: Business process modeling: classification and perspective. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Working Conference on Business Process and Services Computing BPSC 2007, Leipzig, Germany, 25–26 September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, E.: Forward. In: Weske, M. (ed.) Business Process Management Concepts, Languages, Architectures, Second Edition. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, C.: Improving your key business processes. TQM Mag. 6(2), 25–29 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davenport, T.: The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(6), 100–108 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keen, P.G.W., Knapp, E.M.: Every Manager’s Guide to Business Processes: A Glossary of Key Terms & Concepts for Today’s Business Leader. Harvard Business School Press, Brighton (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ljungberg, A.: Process measurement. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manag. 32(4), 254–287 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar, B., Movahedi, U., Kumar, K., Lavassani, M.: On measuring and successful implementation of process-orientation: a literature synthesis. In: Proceedings of Production and Operations Management Division. Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Ottawa, 2–5 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singer, R.: An ontological analysis of business process modeling and execution. arXiv:1905.00499v1 [cs.SE], 18 April 2019. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.00499. Accessed 6 Jan 2020

  9. Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics. Esri Press, Redlands (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cogn. Sci. 11(1), 65–100 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moody, D.: The ‘physics’ of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(6), 756–779 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Decker, G., Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: The business process modeling notation. In: Hofstede, A., Aalst, W., Adams, M., Russell, N. (eds.) Modern Business Process Automation, pp. 347–356. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mandal, S., Weske, M.: A flexible event handling model for business process enactment. In: 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), Stockholm, Sweden, 16–19 October 2018

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mandal, S., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Events in business process implementation: early subscription and event buffering. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) Business Process Management Forum BPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 297. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siricharoen, W.V.: Ontologies and object models in object oriented software engineering. IAENG Int. J. Comput. Sci. 33(1), 19–24 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Fedaghi, S.S., AlQallaf, A.: Modeling and control of engineering plant processes. Int. J. Appl. Syst. Stud. 8, 255–277 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Fedaghi, S.S., Al-Dwaisan, E.: Framework for managing the very large scale integration design process. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 9, 213–222 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Fedaghi, S.: Five generic processes for behaviour description in software engineering. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 17(7), 120–131 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Fedaghi, S.: Thing/machines (thimacs) applied to structural description in software engineering. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 17(8), 1–11 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Fedaghi, S.: Toward maximum grip process modeling in software engineering. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 17(6), 8–18 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Fedaghi, S., Makdessi, M.: Software architecture as a thinging machine: a case study of monthly salary system. In: 3rd Computational Methods in Systems and Software 2019. Springer Series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Fedaghi, S., Al-Saraf, M.: Thinging the robotic architectural structure. In: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics, Control and Robotics, Tokyo, Japan, 22–24 February 2020

    Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Fedaghi, S., Hassouneh, A.: Modeling the Engineering Process as a thinging machine: a case study of chip manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science On-line Conference (CSOC 2019). Springer Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computin (2019). ISSN 2194-5357

    Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Fedaghi, S., Haidar, E.: Programming is diagramming is programming. J. Softw. 14(9), 410–422 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Steiner, H.G.: Theory of mathematical education: an introduction. Learn. Math. 5(2), 11–17 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sfard, A.: On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educ. Stud. Math. 22(1), 1–36 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heidegger, M.: The thing. In: Hofstadter, A. (trans.) Poetry, Language, Thought, pp. 161–184. Harper & Row, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P.-A.: Design things and design thinking: contemporary participatory design challenges. Des. Issues 28(3), 101–116 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pieters, W.: On thinging things and serving services: technological mediation and inseparable goods. Ethics Inf. Technol. 15(3), 195–208 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Edwards, J.C.: The thinging of the thing: the ethic of conditionality in Heidegger’s later work. In: Dreyfus, H.L., Wrathall, M.A. (eds.) A Companion to Heidegger, Chapter 28, pp. 93–112. Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Latour, B.: Why has critique run out of steam? Crit. Inq. 30(2), 225–248 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heidegger, M.: Being and time. In: Macquarrie, J., Robinson, E. (trans.) SCM Press, London (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Whitehead, A.N.: The Concept of Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1964)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Juneja, P.: Components of a process. Management Study Guide Site. https://www.managementstudyguide.com/components-of-a-process.htm. Accessed 4 Jan 2020

  35. Visual Paradigm. BPMN Tutorial with Example - The Leave Application Process 26 February 2015. https://www.visual-paradigm.com/tutorials/bpmn-tutorial-with-example.jsp?format=pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2020

  36. OMG: ISI/IEC 19510 Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) (2013). https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/ISO/19510/PDF. Accessed 7 Jan 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Engineering Department, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 5969, 13060, Safat, Kuwait

    Sabah Al-Fedaghi & Majd Makdessi

Authors
  1. Sabah Al-Fedaghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Majd Makdessi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabah Al-Fedaghi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Applied Informatics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Zlín, Czech Republic

    Radek Silhavy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Al-Fedaghi, S., Makdessi, M. (2020). Modeling Business Process and Events. In: Silhavy, R. (eds) Intelligent Algorithms in Software Engineering. CSOC 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1224. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51965-0_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation