Abstract
During the past 20 years, substantial efforts were made to improve irrigation Management-Operation & Maintenance (MOM) through introduction of participatory irrigation management (PIM). PIM proved generally successful on small and medium schemes but it has yielded limited results on large schemes.
Stakeholder engagement in irrigation system shapes hydrosocial territories: (1) by reducing tension between stakeholders, (2) by redirecting regional planning and strategy, (3) by highlighting water crises, (4) by decentralizing water responsibilities, and (5) by integrating values and beliefs from different stakeholders (Ricart et al., Int J Water Resour Dev 35:491–524, 2018).
Privatization started to become politically fashionable in the late 1980. In this context, privatization means off-loading government ownership or responsibility for operation into the private sector, either to the farmers themselves or to an intermediate private subcontractor. But is it just a means of off-loading responsibility from a government line management system that can’t cope, or is it really to benefit the farmers? (Laycock, A. (2011). Irrigation systems: Design, planning and construction. CABI.)
Barind Multipurpose Development Authority (BMDA) is an autonomous authority. The BMDA does not require external finance to operate the irrigation project and sustainable finance. There are around 16,000 deep tube wells and surface lift pumps covering around 0.6 million hectares (round the year) under BMDA management. BMDA is managed by a board chaired by an appointee of the government. There are three other members representatives from farmers including other relevant department’s representatives.
BMDA has introduced innovative concept for prepayment for water; this was started using a system of using electronic prepaid meters. There are no formal WUOs established instead keeps a very close liaison with the farmers and the communities through their field offices, and this approach appears to be effective. The chief executive of a successful irrigation project should have a clear idea about people, land, and water.
References
International Water Management Institute (IWMI), India Water Week. (2013). Boomtime in Barind: A model for India’s irrigators to follow? An Interview with Dr. Asaduz Zaman 8–12 April.
Laycock, A. (2011). Irrigation systems: Design, planning and construction. CABI.
Raymond Peter, J. (2004). Executive Director, International Network on Participatory Irrigation Management (p. 6). Washington, DC: Participatory Irrigation Management (PIM), Newsletter.
Shah, T. (2014). Groundwater governance and irrigated agriculture (TEC Background Paper no. 19). Global Water Partnership.
Svendsen, M., Trava, J., & Johnson, S. H., III. (1997). Participatory irrigation management: Benefits and second generation problems. Cali: World Bank & IIMI.
Tonkin+Taylor, prepared for Swiss Res Cross. (2016, August). The Integrated Water Resource Management in the BarindTract, Bangladesh.
Zaman, A. (2013a). Replication of Barind model to Muhuri Project May. Paper presented at IWMI Delhi.
Zaman, A. (2013b). Barind: A paradigm of sustainable irrigation management for Bangladesh and beyond. Paper presented in Asia Water Week.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix A
Appendix A
See figure 5
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Zaman, A. (2021). Participatory Irrigation Management: Barind Model – A New Sustainable Initiative. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7_255-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7_255-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51812-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51812-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences