Skip to main content

The Social Inequality Matrix, Universal Social Protection Systems, and Care in Latin America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Care and Care Workers

Part of the book series: Latin American Societies ((LAS))

Abstract

Building comprehensive social protection systems in Latin America capable of articulating contributory and noncontributory mechanisms, labor regulation, and care policies as a crosscutting element is one of the main challenges facing the rights agenda, social inclusion, and the advancement of a development model that is focused on achieving equality. Furthermore, the objective of universality, one of these systems’ basic principles, demands recognizing the differences and acting on the profound inequalities that continue to characterize societies and the labor market in Latin America. This requires a deeper knowledge of the Latin American social inequality matrix and its structuring axes (socioeconomic stratum, gender, race, ethnicity, territory, and life cycle), together with how they interlace and develop in order to guide public policy analysis and planning. The chapter argues that strengthening care policies in the region should consider their role as a pillar of evolving social protection systems that attend these inequalities. The data and reflections developed in this article are partly based on recent institutional publications by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), especially its Social Development Division. The authors wish to thank Amalia Palma for her support in writing this article, Daniela Huneeus for her editorial review, and Bernardo Atuesta for his comments on this article’s preliminary version

The data and reflections developed in this article are partly based on recent institutional publications by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), especially its Social Development Division. The authors wish to thank Amalia Palma for her support in writing this article, Daniela Huneeus for her editorial review, and Bernardo Atuesta for his comments on this article’s preliminary version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Women’s participation rate was 50.2% while men’s was 74.4% (ECLAC, 2019b).

  2. 2.

    See online at: https://oig.cepal.org/es/indicadores/poblacion-sin-ingresos-propios-sexo

  3. 3.

    Time use surveys provide information on the activities people perform in a certain period and the amount of time assigned to them, as established by the Classification of Time-Use Activities for Latin America and the Caribbean (CAUTAL) (ECLAC/INEGI/INMUJERES/ONU-Mujeres, 2016 in ECLAC, 2017a). Currently 19 countries in the region have implemented at least one time use measurement. Although these surveys cannot be compared with each other due to their methodological differences, they provide very important information about the domestic and care work conducted within households as well as their distribution between men and women (ECLAC, 2017a).

  4. 4.

    This is an essential dimension of equality that includes both the distribution of current monetary incomes among people and households, as well as inequalities in the functional distribution of income between capital and labor, and inequality in owning financial and non-financial assets (Bárcena & Prado, 2016; ECLAC, 2017a, 2019b).

  5. 5.

    The development of ECLAC’s thinking on equality over the last decade has been summarized in the following institutional documents: Time for Equality: Closing Gaps, Opening Trails (ECLAC, 2010b); Structural Change for Equality: An Integrated Approach to Development (ECLAC, 2012), Compacts for Equality: Towards a Sustainable Future (ECLAC, 2014b), Horizons 2030: Equality at the Center of Sustainable Development (ECLAC, 2016d) and The Inefficiency of Inequality (ECLAC, 2018c).

  6. 6.

    For more information about these programs and their descriptions and components, see Non-Contributory Social Protection Programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean Database, Social Development Division, ECLAC, [online at]: https://dds.cepal.org/bpsnc/cct

  7. 7.

    Data for 20 Latin American and Caribbean countries that have CCTs.

  8. 8.

    Chile (2015), Colombia (2012), Costa Rica (2011), Ecuador (2012), Mexico (2014), and Peru (2010). Children and adolescents are classified as anyone under the age of 18 and over 12, except in Colombia where the lower limit is 10 (ECLAC, 2017a, p. 200).

  9. 9.

    In 2016, the proportion of women aged 65 or older that received pensions below two poverty lines (44%) was 8% points higher than among men (36%) (ECLAC, 2018b).

  10. 10.

    Forty percent of the average monthly contributory pension benefits, usually higher than non-contributory pensions, were below the minimum wage threshold in eight countries of the region in around 2015 (ECLAC, 2018b).

  11. 11.

    For information on the non-contributory cash transfer and pension benefits received by persons with disabilities in countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, see Non-Contributory Social Protection Programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean Database, Social Development Division, ECLAC, [online at]: https://dds.cepal.org/bpsnc/cct. Also see Ullmann, Atuesta, Cecchini and Rubio (n.d.).

  12. 12.

    A detailed review of these instruments can be found in Rico and Robles (2016, 2017).

  13. 13.

    For a more detailed analysis of these tendencies, including the heterogeneity found between Latin American and Caribbean countries, see ECLAC (2018b).

References

  • Abramo, L., Cecchini, S., & Morales, B. (2019). Social programmes, poverty eradication and labor inclusion: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC Books No. 155 - LC/PUB.2019/5-P). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, L., & Valenzuela, M. E. (2016). Tempo de trabalho remunerado e não remunerado na América Latina. Uma repartição desigual. In A. R. P Abreu, et al. (Orgs.), Gênero e Trabalho no Brasil e na França – Perspectivas interseccionais (pp. 113–124). São Paulo: Boitempo Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bárcena, A., & Prado, A. (2016). El imperativo de la igualdad: Por un desarrollo sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe. Buenos Aires: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campello, T., Falcão, T., & Costa, P.V. (Orgs.). (2015). Brasil sin Miseria. Brasilia: Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Lucha contra el Hambre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campello, T., & Gentili, P. (2017). As múltiplas faces da desigualdade. In T. Campello (Coord.), Faces da desigualdade no Brasil: Um olhar sobre os que ficam para trás (pp. 10–15). Brasília: FLACSO-CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, S., & Atuesta, B. (2017). Conditional cash transfer programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean: Coverage and investment trends (Social Policy Series, No. 224, LC/TS.2017/40). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, S., & Martínez, R. (2012). Inclusive social protection in Latin America: A comprehensive, rights-based approach (ECLAC Books No. 111, LC/G.2488-P). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, S., & Rico, M. N. (2015). The rights-based approach in social protection. In S. Cecchini et al. (Eds.), Towards universal social protection: Latin American pathways and policy tolls (ECLAC Books, No. 136, LC/G.2644-P). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2010a). Social panorama of Latin America, 2009 (LC/G.2423-P). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2010b). Time for equality: Closing gaps, opening trails (LC/G.2432-SES.33/3). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2012). Structural change for equality: An integrated approach to development (LC/G.2524-SES.34/3). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2014a). Social panorama of Latin America, 2014 (LC/G.2635-P). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2014b). Compacts for equality: Towards a sustainable future (LC/G.2586-SES.35/3). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC/INEGI/INMUJERES/UN-Women (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean/ National Institute of Statistics and Geography/National Women’s Institute of Mexico/United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women) (2016). Classification of Time-Use Activities for Latin America and the Caribbean (CAUTAL) (LC/W.679), Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2016a). The social inequality matrix in Latin America (LC/G.2690-MDS.1/2). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2016b). Inclusive social development: The next generation of policies for overcoming poverty and reducing inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean (LC.L/4056/Rev.1). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2016c). Social panorama of Latin America, 2015 (LC/G.2691-P). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2016d). Horizons 2030: Equality at the centre of sustainable development (LC/G.2660/Rev.1). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2017a). Social panorama of Latin America, 2016 (LC/PUB.2017/12-P). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2017b). Linkages between the social and production spheres: Gaps, pillars and challenges (LC/CDS.2/3182). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2017c). Situación de las personas afrodescendientes en América Latina y desafíos de políticas para la garantía de sus derechos (Documentos de Proyectos, LC/TS.2017/121). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2018a). Towards a regional agenda for inclusive social development: Bases and initial proposal (LC/MDS.2/2). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2018b). Social panorama of Latin America, 2017 (LC/PUB.2018/1-P). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2018c). The inefficiency of inequality (LC/SES.37/3-P). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2019a). Social panorama of Latin America, 2019 (LC/PUB.2019/3-P). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2019b). Social panorama of Latin America, 2018 (LC/PUB.2019/3-P). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2019c). Women’s autonomy in changing economic scenarios (LC/CRM.14/3). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2019d). Critical obstacles to inclusive social development in Latin America and the Caribbean: Background for a regional agenda (LC/CDS.3/3). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2020). Regional agenda for inclusive social development (LC/CDS.3/5). Santiago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (ILO). (2018). Presente y futuro de la protección social en América Latina y el Caribe (Panorama Temático Laboral 4). Lima: ILO/Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado, C., Martínez, J., & Martínez, R. (2018). Protección social y migración: Una mirada desde las vulnerabilidades a lo largo del ciclo de la migración y de la vida de las personas (Documentos de proyectos - LC/TS.2018/62). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercadante, A. (2019). Educação e Capacitação Técnica e Profissional no Brasil (Documentos de Projetos - LC/TS.2019/44). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico, M. N. (2014). El desafío de cuidar y ser cuidado en igualdad. Hacia el surgimiento de sistemas nacionales de cuidado. In M. Hopenhayn et al. (Eds.), Pactos sociales para una protección social más inclusiva. Experiencias, obstáculos y posibilidades en América Latina y Europa (Serie Seminarios y Conferencias No.76, LC/L.3820). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico, M. N., & Robles, C. (2016). Políticas de cuidado en América Latina: Forjando la igualdad (Serie Asuntos de Género No. 140, LC/L.4226). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico, M. N., & Robles, C. (2017). Care as a pillar of social protection: Rights, policies and institutions in Latin America. In R. Martínez (Ed.), Institutional frameworks for social policy in Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC Book, No. 146, LC/PUB.2017/14-P) (pp. 205–233). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles, C. (2009). Pueblos indígenas y programas de transferencias con corresponsabilidad: Avances y desafíos desde un enfoque étnico (Serie Políticas Sociales No. 156). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, S. (2011). Hacia un sistema nacional de cuidados en el Uruguay. In M. N. Rico (Ed.), El desafío de un sistema nacional de cuidados para el Uruguay (Serie Seminarios y Conferencias No. 66, LC/L.3359). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tromben, V., & Podestá, A. (2019). Las prestaciones familiares públicas en América Latina (Documentos de Proyectos, LC/TS.2018/97/Rev.1). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, H., Atuesta, B., Cecchini, S. & Rubio, M. (n.d.). Las transferencias monetarias no contributivas: Un instrumento para promover los derechos y el bienestar de la población infantil con discapacidad en América Latina y el Caribe (Serie Políticas Sociales). Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015, October). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2017). “World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision” [online] https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/.

Download references

Acknowledgment

This chapter was translated from its original Spanish version to English by Jill Haring.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abramo, L., Robles, C. (2021). The Social Inequality Matrix, Universal Social Protection Systems, and Care in Latin America. In: Araujo Guimarães, N., Hirata, H. (eds) Care and Care Workers. Latin American Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51693-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51693-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51692-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51693-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics