Abstract
The growing demand for care services has been challenging academics by broadening their research lines in the international scientific community although in different pace. In fact, the theories and debates on care, which date back to the 1980s in the United States, have developed much more recently in Europe, where publications only appeared in late 1990s. This phenomenon has also elicited a growing interest in Latin America from late 2000s, where research has been conducted in different countries like Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Uruguay. On the other hand, although comparative studies are frequent, they cover mostly European countries. Nevertheless, Latin America is a social space where professional care has expanded dramatically over the past 20 years. However, unlike Japan, in the US and European countries, such expansion took place in a context of heterogeneous and poorly structured markets, which challenge not only academics but also decision makers. This chapter aims at presenting the scenario of Latin American research on care and care work vis-à-vis the international debates in the field. Firstly, the authors will situate the new empirical material vis-à-vis the broader preexisting literature. Secondly, they will explore how the Latin American experience transforms existing understandings on the social organization of care, especially on its relations with gender and race/ethnicity inequalities, which ground the new experiences of care policies in the region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this therapeutic sense, the Portuguese and Spanish terms also express status differences, suggesting distinction strategies. Only one term is used to refer the doctor’s work, which is cura (meaning “cure”). The therapeutic work done by nurses is never denoted as “cure,” referred to instead as assistência/asistencia (meaning “assistance”) to indicate the direct support they give to doctors and the indirect support they give to ensure prescriptions are implemented correctly. When it comes to their direct action with patients, the word would definitely be cuidado.
- 2.
Razavi (2007, p. 32) stated ironically: What feminist economics has brought to this relatively new area of research are its distinct conceptual frameworks, which render visible critical areas of the economy that have escaped analytical and empirical scrutiny by ‘malestream’ economics, namely the production and maintenance of human beings.
- 3.
It is worth mentioning some of the pioneers that contributed to this field. For example, Geneviève Cresson (1995) reflected on studies conducted in 1987 about the unpaid domestic work performed by women, which she already qualified as de soin work, calling it soins profanes. Likewise, the research program on “domestic production” conducted by Christine Delphy and Yannick Lemel in the 1980s was also ground-breaking (Delphy, 1978).
- 4.
Indeed, the dimension of race and ethnicity has been on the political agenda of US social movements since 1977, when the Combahee River Collective (1977) postulated in their renowned declaration that their experiences with simultaneous oppressions made it hard for them to separate oppression from race, class, and sex. In a country marked by the commercial enslavement of afro-descendants such as the US, care work, especially domestic care work, carried the indelible mark of this multiple experience. Women were certainly not all equal, and care varied in terms of visibility, recognition, and retribution, depending on the class and race of the provider.
- 5.
Borgeaud-Garciandia, Guimarães, and Hirata (2000), in discussing the subjects that catalyzed the interests of the countries in the so-called “South” and the Latin Americans it encompassed, highlighted three large domains. The first is about the diversity and complexity of care work in these societies, especially in terms of the links between its paid and unpaid forms. The second refers to social inequalities, which become severe when commodified types of care fill the void left by inefficient State action. The third refers to the relation between care and rights, which is urgent in societies where social protection from Welfare States was either non-existent or limited. Thus, the configurations of State and inequalities emerged as the two main beacons in the debate.
- 6.
It can be observed that, at the same time, initiatives from international agencies exposed the care agenda to public policy formulators and managers in Latin America. Thus, in 2007, during ECLAC’s 10th Regional Conference on Women, the countries recognized in the “Quito Consensus” that care was a subject of public interest that should mobilize States, local governments, organizations, enterprises, and families. At the 11th Conference, held in Brasília in 2010, the subject gained even more importance and an entire chapter of the base document was dedicated to the subject of care economy. Almost simultaneously the notion of care appears as one of the articulating concepts in the text about work and family published by the United Nations Development Program and the International Labor Organization (International Labour Office [ILO]/United Nations Development Program [UNDP], 2009). Important researchers were present in these scenarios, as well as in seminars conducted by ECLAC in 2004 and 2005 that focused on family, seeking theorizations that were adapted to the reality and diversity of the region. The subject of care, of an economy of care, and of a culture of care was already on the table then (Arriagada, 2007; Arriagada, n.d.). However, these forums did not seem enough for spreading the new knowledge being produced in the region. Hence the place and growth of the strictly academic conduits referred to here.
- 7.
In presenting these strands, we use specific bibliographic references only as a way to illustrate the content of each one without any pretense for exhausting local production.
- 8.
This is especially true in Brazil’s case, where domestic employment is the main stronghold for female occupations. Hence the volume of production it has gathered on the subject.
- 9.
Guimarães, Hirata, and Sugita (2011) explored an alternative concept of “modes of care provision” in a text comparing Brazil, Japan, and France.
References
Acciari, L. (2018, February 26). Brazilian domestic workers and the international struggle for labour rights. A-id: Agenda for International Development. Retrieved April 14, 2020, from http://www.a-id.org/2018/2002/2026/brazilian-domestic-workers-international-struggle-labour-rights/
Aguiar, N. (2001). Múltiplas temporalidades de referência: Trabalho doméstico e trabalho remunerado: Análise dos usos do tempo em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais: Um projeto piloto para zonas metropolitanas brasileiras. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.
Anderson, J. (n.d.). Cuidados Multiculturales. In K. Batthyány (Ed.), Miradas latinoamericanas al cuidado. Ciudad de México: CLACSO/Siglo XXI.
Antonopoulos, R., & Hirway, I. (Eds.). (2010). Unpaid work and the economy. Gender, time use and poverty in developing countries. London: Palgrave.
Arango Gaviria, L., Amaya Urquijo, A., Pérez-Bustos, T., & Pineda Duque, J. (2018). Presentación. In L. A. Gaviria, A. A. Urquijo, T. Pérez-Bustos, & J. P. Duque (Eds.), Género y Cuidado. Teorías, escenarios y políticas (pp. 8–18). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Universidad de los Andes.
Arango Gaviria, L., & Molinier, P. (2011). El cuidado como ética e como trabajo. In L. Arango Gaviria & P. Molinier (Eds.), El trabajo y la ética del cuidado (pp. 15–21). Bogotá: La Carretera Ed. and UNAL/Escuela de Estudios de Género.
Arango Gaviria, L. G. (2018a). Care, émotions et conditions de travail dans les services esthétiques au Brésil. In N. Guimarães, M. Maruani, & B. Sorj (Orgs.), Genre, race, clase. Travailler en France et au Brésil (pp. 277–289). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Arango Gaviria, L. G. (2018b). Servicios de cuidado y practicas de reparación frente al racismo: Salones de belleza para mujeres negras en Brasil. In L. A. Gaviria, A. A. Urquijo, T. Pérez-Bustos, & J. P. Duque (Eds.), Género y Cuidado. Teorías, escenarios y políticas (pp. 120–137). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Universidad de los Andes.
Arriagada, I. (n.d.). Trayectorias de investigación y trayectorias vitales. In K. Batthyány (Ed.), Miradas latinoamericanas al cuidado. Ciudad de México: CLACSO/Siglo XXI.
Arriagada, I. (Coord.). (2007). Familias y políticas públicas en América Latina: Una historia de desencuentros. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas/CEPAL e UNFPA. Retrieved April 18, 2020, from https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/2504/S0700488_es.pdf?sequenc
Arriagada, I., & Todaro, R. (2012). El papel de las migrantes peruanas en la provisión de cuidados en Chile. Santo Domingo: ONU Mujeres-CEM.
Avril, C., & Cartier, M. (2019). Care, genre et migration. Pour une sociologie contextualisée des travailleuses domestiques dans la mondialisation. Génèses, 1(114), 134–152.
Batthyány, K. (Ed.). (n.d.). Miradas latinoamericanas al cuidado. Ciudad de México: CLACSO/Siglo XXI.
Batthyány, K., & Genta, N. (2020). Uruguay: Avances y desafíos en la investigación y las políticas públicas del cuidado. In N. Guimaraes & H. Hirata (Eds.), El cuidado en América Latina. Mirando a los casos de Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colombia y Uruguay. Buenos Aires: Medifé Edita.
Beigel, F. (Ed.). (2019). Key texts for Latin American sociology. Sage studies in international sociology series. London: Sage.
Bilac, E. (1983). Família e trabalho feminino: A ideologia e as práticas familiares de um grupo de “trabalhadores manuais” de uma cidade do interior paulista. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of São Paulo, FFLCH, São Paulo.
Borgeaud-Garciandía, N. (2017). Puertas adentro. Trabajo de cuidado domiciliario a adultos mayores y migracion en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires: Teseo.
Borgeaud-Garciandia, N. (2020). Entre desarrollo y fragmentaciones: Estudios y panorama del cuidado remunerado en Argentina. In N. Guimaraes & H. Hirata (Eds.), El cuidado en América Latina. Mirando a los casos de Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colombia y Uruguay. Buenos Aires: Medifé Edita.
Borgeaud-Garciandia, N., Guimaraes, N. A., & Hirata, H. (2000). Introduction: Care aux Suds. Quand le travail de care interroge les inégalités sociales. Revue Internationale des Etudes du Développement, 242.
Brites, J. (2007). Afeto e desigualdade: Gênero, geração e classe entre empregadas domésticas e seus empregadores. Cadernos Pagu, 29, 91–109.
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1969). Dependencia y Desarrollo en America Latina. Ensayo de interpretacion sociologica. Mexico: Siglo XXI.
Cerrutti, M., & Gaudio, M. (2010). Gender differences between Mexican migration to the United States and Paraguayan Migration to Argentina. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 630(1), 93–113.
Cerrutti, M., & Maguid, A. (2010). Familias divididas y cadenas globales de cuidado: La migración sudamericana a España (Serie Políticas Sociales No. 163). Santiago: ECLAC.
Chaney, C., & Castro, M. G. (Eds.). (1989). Muchachas no more: Household workers in Latin America and the Caribbean. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Combahee River Collective. (1977). The Combahee River collective statement. In B. Smith (Ed.), Home girls: A black feminist anthology (pp. 264–274). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Cresson, G. (1995). Le travail domestique de santé. Paris: L’Harmattan, collection Logiques Sociales.
Daly, M., & Lewis, J. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 281–298.
De Barbieri, T. (1984). Mujeres y vida cotidiana. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
De Barbieri, T., & de Oliveira, O. (1987). Reproducción de la fuerza de trabajo en América Latina: Algunas hipótesis. In M. Schteingart (Ed.), Las ciudades latino-americanas en la crisis: Problemas y desafios (pp. 9–29). Ciudad de México: Trillas.
Debert, G. G., & Oliveira, A. (2015). A profissionalização da atividade de cuidar de idosos no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 18, 7–41.
Delphy, C. (1978). Travail ménager ou travail domestique? In A. Michel (Dir.), Les femmes dans la société marchande (pp. 39–54). Paris: P.U.F.
Destremau, B., & Georges, I. (Eds.). (2017). Le care, face morale du capitalisme. Assistance et police des familles en Amérique Latine. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2016). La matriz de la desigualdad social en América Latina (LC/G.2690(MDS.1/2)). Santiago: United Nations, ECLAC. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/events/files/matriz_de_la_desigualdad.pdf
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2019). Panorama social de América Latina 2019 (LC/PUB.2019/3-P). Santiago: United Nations, ECLAC. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45090/1/S1900909_pt.pdf
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esquivel, V. (Ed.). (2012). La economía feminista desde América Latina. Una hoja de ruta sobre los debates actuales en la región. Santo Domingo: ONU Mujeres.
Esquivel, V., Budlender, D., Folbre, N., & Hirway, I. (2008). Time-use surveys in Latin America. Feminist Economics, 14(3), 107–153.
Faur, E. (2011). A widening gap? The political and social organization of childcare in Argentina. Development and Change, 42(4), 967–994.
Faur, E. (2012). El cuidado infantil desde las perspectivas de las mujeres–madres. In V. Esquivel, E. Faur, & E. Jelín (Eds.), Las lógicas del cuidado infantil. Buenos Aires: IDES.
Faur, E. (2014). El cuidado infantil en el siglo XXI. Mujeres malabaristas en una sociedad desigual. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
Ferber, M. A., & Nelson, J. A. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist economics today: Beyond economic man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Filgueiras, F. (2013). Los regímenes de bienestar en el ocaso de la modernización conservadora: Posibilidades y límites de la ciudadanía social en América Latina. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 22(2), 17–46.
Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Toward a feminist theory of caring. In E. Abel & M. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Folbre, N. (1982). Exploitation comes home: A critique of the Marxian theory of family labor. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge, 6(4), 317–329.
Folbre, N. (1994). Who pays for the kids? Gender and the structures of constraint. London: Routledge.
Folbre, N. (2001). The invisible heart: Economics and family values. New York: New Press.
Folbre, N. (2006). Measuring care: Gender, empowerment, and the care economy. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183–199.
Gálvez, T., & Todaro, R. (1986). Trabajo doméstico remunerado: Conceptos, hechos, datos. Santiago: CEM.
Gálvez, T., & Todaro, R. (1989). Housework for pay in Chile: Not just another job. In E. Chaney & M. G. Castro (Eds.), Muchachas no more: Household workers in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 307–321). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
García, B., Muñoz, H., & de Oliveira, O. (1984). La familia obrera y la reproducción de la fuerza de trabajo en la Ciudad de México. In P. G. Casanova (Coord.), El Obrero Mexicano (pp. 9–42). Ciudad de México: Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Siglo XXI.
Garcia, B., & Pacheco, E. (Eds.). (2014). Uso del tempo y trabajo no remunerado en México. México: El Colegio de México.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice, psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1993). Letter to readers, 1993. In C. Gilligan (Ed.), In a different voice, psychological theory and women’s development (2nd ed., pp. IX–XXVII). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Giullari, S., & Lewis, J. (2005). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: The search for new policy principles, and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach (Programme on Social Policy and Development Paper No. 19). Geneva: UNRISD.
Glenn, E. N. (2009). Le travail forcé: Citoyenneté, obligation statutaire et assignation des femmes au care. In P. Molinier, P. Paperman, & S. Laugier (Dir.), Qu’est-ce que le care ? Souci des autres, sensibilité, responsabilité (pp. 113–131). Paris: Editions Payot & Rivages.
González, L. (1988). A categoria político-cultural de amefricanidade. Tempo Brasileiro, 92/93, 69–82.
Guerra, M. F. L. (2017). Trabalhadoras domésticas no Brasil: Coortes, formas de contratação e famílias contratantes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate Program in Demography, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
Guimarães, N. A. (2019a). Chapter 12: Inequality, inequalities. In F. Beigel (Ed.), Key texts for Latin American Sociology. Sage studies in international sociology series (pp. 175–186). London: Sage.
Guimarães, N. A. (2019b). Os circuitos do cuidado. Reflexões a partir do caso brasileiro. In 2019 Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA). (Panel “El trabajo de cuidado: Relaciones, significados, derechos. Miradas Latinoamericanas”), Boston.
Guimarães, N. A., & Hirata, H. (2016). La frontera entre el empleo doméstico y el trabajo profesional de cuidados en Brasil. Pistas y correlatos en el proceso de mercantilización. Sociología del Trabajo, (86), 7–27.
Guimarães, N. A., & Hirata, H. (2020). El cuidado en América Latina. Mirando a los casos de Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colombia y Uruguay. Buenos Aires: Medifé Edita.
Guimarães, N. A., Hirata, H., & Sugita, K. (2011). Cuidado e cuidadoras. O trabalho de care no Brasil, França e Japão. Sociologia & Antropologia, 1(1), 151–180.
Guimarães, N. A., Maruani, M., & Sorj, B. (Eds.). (2016). Genre, race, classe. Travailler en France et au Brésil. Paris: L’Harmatan.
Guimarães, N. A., & Vieira, P. P. F. (2020). As “ajudas”: O cuidado que não diz seu nome. Estudos Avançados, 34(98), 7–23.
Herrera, G. (2013). Lejos de tus pupilas: Familias transnacionales, cuidados y desigualdad social en Ecuador. Quito: FLACSO-Ecuador.
Himmelweit, S. (1999). Domestic labor. In J. Peterson & M. Lewis (Eds.), The elgar companion to feminist economics (pp. 126–135). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hirata, H. (n.d.). Por uma arqueologia do saber sobre cuidado no Brasil. In K. Batthyány (Ed.), Miradas latinoamericanas al cuidado. Ciudad de México: CLACSO/Siglo XXI.
Hirata, H., & Guimarães, N. A. (2012). Cuidado e cuidadoras. As várias faces do trabalho do Care. São Paulo: Atlas.
Hirata, H., & Zarifian, P. (2000). Travail (le concept de). In H. Hirata et al. (Eds.), Dictionnaire critique du féminisme (pp. 230–235). Paris: PUF.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (2000). Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens (Eds.), On the edge: Living with global capitalism. London: Jonathan Cape.
Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. San Francisco; Los Angeles: University of California Press.
International Conference. (2013). Théories et pratiques du care: Comparaisons internationales. MAGE-CNRS, CRESPPA-GTM-CNRS and Agir pour le care. (Groupe Humanis). Paris: Université Paris Descartes.
International Labour Office (ILO). (2018). Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. Geneva: Author. Retrieved January 5, 2020, from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-dgreports/%2D%2D-dcomm/%2D%2D-publ/documents/publication/wcms_633135.pdf
International Labour Office (ILO), & United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2009). Trabajo y familia: Hacia nuevas formas de conciliación con corresponsabilidad social. Santiago de Chile: Author. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-dgreports/%2D%2D-gender/documents/publication/wcms_111376.pdf
Jelin, E. (2014). Desigualdades de clase, género y etnicidad/raza. Realidades históricas, aproximaciones analíticas (Working Paper Series No. 73). Berlin: desiguALdades.net.
Jelin, E., Caggiano, S., & Monbello, L. (2011). Por los derechos: Mujeres y hombres en la acción colectiva. Buenos Aires: Nueva Trilce.
Jesus, J. C. (2018). Trabalho doméstico não-remunerado no Brasil. Uma análise de produção, consumo e transferência. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in Demography, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
Kergoat, D. (2016). Le care et l’imbrication des rapports sociaux. In N. A. Guimarães, M. Maruani, & B. Sorj (Org.), Genre, race, classe. Travailler en France et au Brésil (pp. 11–23). Paris: L’Harmatan.
Kofes, M. S. (2001). Mulher, mulheres: Identidade, diferença e desigualdades na relação entre patroas e empregadas domésticas. Campinas: Unicamp.
Leiva, S., Mansilla, M. Á., & Comelin, A. (2017). Condiciones laborales de migrantes bolivianas que realizan trabajo de cuidado en Iquique. Revista de Estudios Fronterizos, 17(2), 11–37.
Leiva, S., & Ross, C. (2016). Migración circular y trabajo de cuidado: Fragmentación de trayectorias laborales de migrantes bolivianas en Tarapacá. Psicoperspectivas: Individuo y Sociedad, 15(3), 56–66.
López-Calva, L. F., & Lustig, N. (Eds.). (2010). Declining inequality in Latin America. A decade of progress? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Lustig, N. (Ed.). (1995). Copying with austerity: Poverty and inequality in Latin America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Magliano, M. J., Mallimaci, A., Rosas, C., & Borgeaud-Garciandía, N. (2019). Migraciones sur-sur y trabajos de cuidado. Aportes desde el contexto argentino. Anthropos, (151), 161–177.
Magliano, M. J., Mallimaci, A. I., Borgeaud-Garciandía, N., & Rosas, C. (2018). Migración y organización social del cuidado en Argentina: Un campo de estudio emergente. In R. Baeninger, et al. (Orgs.), Migrações Sul-Sul (pp. 741–749). Campinas: NEPO/UNICAMP.
Marini, R. M. (1973). Dialéctica de la Dependencia. México: Ed. Era.
Meertens, D. (2018). Re-tejiendo la sociedad campesina: Género, cuidado y justicia en el posconflicto. In L. G. A. Gaviria, A. A. Urquijo, T. Pérez-Bustos, & J. P. Duque (Eds.), Género y cuidado. Teorias, escenarios y políticas (pp. 70–87). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Universidad de los Andes.
Michel, S., & Peng, I. (2017). Gender, migration and the work of care. A multi-scalar approach to the Pacific Rim. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Molinier, P. (2005). Le care à l’épreuve du travail. Vulnérabilités croisées et savoir-faire discrets. In P. Paperman & S. Laugier (Eds.), Le souci des autres. Ethique et politique du care (pp. 299–316). Paris: Ed. de l’EHESS.
Molinier, P., Laugier, S., & Paperman, P. (2009). Qu’est-ce que le care? Souci des autres, sensibilité, responsabilité. Paris: Petite Bibliothèque Payot.
Moreno, R. F. C. (2019). Entre a família, o Estado e o mercado: Mudanças e continuidades na dinâmica, distribuição e composição do trabalho doméstico e de cuidado. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate Program in Sociology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Nun, J. L. (1969). Superpoblación relativa, ejército industrial de reserva y masa marginal. Revista Latinoamericana de Sociología, 5(2) Retrieved April 26, 2020, from https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/7934/S7100908_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Okin, S. M. (1989). Justice, gender and the family. New York: Basic Books.
Okin, S. M. (1991). Gender, the public, and the private. In D. Held (Ed.), Political theory today (pp. 67–90). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Oliveira, O., Lehalleur, M. P., & Salles, V. (Eds.). (1989). Grupos domésticos y reproducción cotidiana. Cuidad de México: El Colegio de México/Porrúa.
Orloff, A. S. (2002). Women’s employment and welfare regimes: Globalization, export-orientation and social policy in Europe and North America (Programme Papers on Social Policy and Development Paper No. 12). Geneva: UNSRID.
Paperman, P. (2005). Les gens vulnérables n’ont rien d’exceptionnel. In P. Paperman, & S. Laugier (Dir.), Le souci des autres. Ethique et politique du care (pp. 281–297). Paris: Ed. de l’EHESS.
Paperman, P., & Laugier, S. (2005). Le souci des autres. Ethique et politique du care. Paris: Ed. de l’EHESS.
Paperman, P. (2017). Care et discriminations: Questions autour du handicap. In A. Damamme, H. Hirata, & P. Molinier (Coords.), Le travail: Entre public, privé et intime. Comparaisons et enjeux internationaux du care (pp. 183–193). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Pautassi, L. C. (2007). El cuidado como cuestión social desde un enfoque de derechos (Serie Mujer y Desarrollo No. 87). Santiago de Chile: ECLAC and Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional.
Perez Orozco, A. (2012). Prólogo. In V. Esquivel (Ed.), La economia feminista desde América Latina. Uma hoja de ruta sobre los debates actuales em la región (pp. 13–23). Santo Domingo: ONU Mujeres.
Pérez-Bustos, T., Olarte Sierra, M. F., & Díaz del Castillo H. A. (2017). Pratiquer la médecine légale avec care: Expériences de femmes scientifiques invisibles en Colombie. In A. Damamme, H. Hirata, & P. Molinier (Coords.), Le travail: Entre public, privé et intime. Comparaisons et enjeux internationaux du care (pp. 207–232). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Pineda Duque, J. A. (n.d.). La organización social del cuidado de la infancia y la vejez en Colombia. In K. Batthyány (Ed.), Miradas latinoamericanas al cuidado. Ciudad de México: CLACSO/Siglo XXI.
Pineda Duque, J. A., & Munévar, M. D. I. (2020). La organización social de los cuidados en Colombia: Mercantilización, profesionalización, desvalorización y resistencias. In N. Guimaraes & H. Hirata (Eds.), El cuidado en América Latina. Mirando a los casos de Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colombia y Uruguay. Buenos Aires: Medifé Edita.
Piscitelli, A. (2018). Economías sexuales y percepciones sobre cuidado. In L. A. Gaviria, A. A. Urquijo, T. Pérez-Bustos, & J. P. Duque (Eds.), Género y Cuidado. Teorías, escenarios y políticas (pp. 104–118). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Universidad de los Andes.
Prebisch, R. (1963). Hacia una dinâmica del desarrollo latino-americano. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Razavi, S. (2007). The political and social economy of care in a development context. In Conceptual issues, research questions and policy options. Geneva: UNSRID.
Reygadadas, L., & Gootemberg, P. (Eds.). (2010). Indelible inequalities in Latin America. Insights from history, politics, and culture. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.
Rios, F. (2019). Améfrica Ladina: The conceptual legacy of Lélia Gonzalez (1935-1994). LASA Forum, 50(3), 75–79.
Rosas, C. (2018). Mujeres migrantes en el cuidado comunitario. Organización, jerarquizaciones y disputas al sur de Buenos Aires. In C. Vega, R. Martínez Buján, & M. Paredes (Eds.), Experiencias y vínculos cooperativos en el sostenimiento de la vida en América Latina y el Sur de Europa (pp. 301–321). Madrid: Ed. Traficantes de Sueños.
Saffioti, H. (1969). A Mulher na Sociedade de Classes – Mito e realidade. São Paulo: Livraria Quatro Artes.
Saffioti, H. (1978). Emprego Doméstico e Capitalismo. Petrópolis: Ed. Vozes.
Salama, P. (2006). Le défi des inégalités. Amérique Latine/Asie: Une comparaison économique. Paris: La Découverte.
Silva, L. A. M. (2018). Mercados metropolitanos de trabalho manual e marginalidade. In M. Cavalcanti, E. Motta, & M. Araujo (Orgs.). O mundo popular. Trabalho e condições de vida (pp. 83–182). Rio de Janeiro: Papeis Selvagens. (Originally: MA Dissertation - Graduate Program in Anthropology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Museu Nacional, 1971).
Sorj, B. (2016). Le care dans la lutte contre la violence au Brésil. In N. Guimarães, M. Maruani, & B. Sorj (Eds.), Genre, race, classe. Travailler en France et au Brésil (pp. 321–332). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Todaro, R., & Arriagada, I. (2011). Cadenas globales de cuidados: El papel de las migrantes peruanas en la provisión de cuidados en Chile. Santiago: ONU Mujeres/Cem (Centro de Estudios para la Mujer).
Todaro, R., & Rodríguez, R. (Eds.). (2001). El Género en la Economía. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios de la Mujer.
Tokman, V., & O’Donnell, G. (Eds.). (1998). Poverty and inequality in Latin America. Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame Press.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care. New York; London: Routledge.
Tronto, J. (2018). Economía, ética y democracia: Tres lenguajes en torno al cuidado. In L. A. Gaviria, A. A. Urquijo, T. Pérez-Bustos, & J. P. Duque (Eds.), Género y Cuidado. Teorías, escenarios y políticas (pp. 22–36). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Universidad de los Andes.
Valenzuela, M. E. (2019). Desigualdad, crisis de los cuidados y migración para el trabajo doméstico remunerado en América Latina. In 2019 Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA). (Panel “El trabajo de cuidado: Relaciones, significados, derechos. Miradas Latinoamericanas”). Boston.
Valenzuela, M. E., & Mora, C. (2009). Esfuerzos concertados para la revalorización del trabajo doméstico remunerado en América Latina. In M. E. Valenzuela & C. Mora (Eds.), Trabajo doméstico. Un largo camino hacia el trabajo decente (pp. 285–304). Santiago: ILO.
Acknowledgment
This chapter was translated from its original Portuguese version to English by Jill Haring.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Araujo Guimarães, N., Hirata, H. (2021). Care Work: A Latin American Perspective. In: Araujo Guimarães, N., Hirata, H. (eds) Care and Care Workers. Latin American Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51693-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51693-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51692-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51693-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)