Abstract
The concluding chapter, based on evaluation of the chapters in the volume, outlines the prospects for future research by using institutions as analytical windows into social change in general. Discussing the possible “next steps” and urging that scholars avoid putting various forms of complexity into habitual categorical types, the author particularly raises the question of useful units of analysis, or, in other words, of units of what scale would be more legitimate to consider and analyze as institutions—for example, to analyze ancient Greek temples as an institution or subdivide temples in a variety of institutions (public celebration around a temple, elite celebration in the porch of the temple, which was connected to the imperial cult, etc.).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blanton, R.E., G.M. Feinman, S.A. Kowalewski, and P.N. Peregrine. 1996. A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology 37 (1): 1–14.
de Montmollin, O. 2004. The Archaeology of Political Structure: Settlement Analysis in a Classic Maya Polity. New Studies in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Small, D.B. 2007. Mycenaean Polities: States or Estates? In Rethinking Mycenaean Palaces II, ed. M. Galaty and W. Parkinson, 47–54. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institution of Archaeology.
Small, D.B. 2009. The Dual-Processual Model in Ancient Greece: Applying a Post-Neoevolutionary Model to a Data-Rich Environment. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28 (2): 205–221.
Small, D.B. 2011. Contexts, Agency, and Social Change in Ancient Greece. In State Formation in Italy and Greece: Questioning the Neoevolutionist Paradigm, ed. N. Terrenato and D. Haggis, 197–217. Oxford: Oxbow.
Small, D.B. 2019. Ancient Greece: Social Structure and Evolution., Case Studies in Early Societies Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yoffee, N. 1993. Too Many Chiefs? (Or, Safe Texts for the‘90s). In Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? ed. N. Yoffee, and A. Sherratt, 60–78. New Directions in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yoffee, N. 2005. Myths of the Archaic State: Evolution of the Earliest Cities, States, and Civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Small, D.B. (2020). In Conclusion: Two Thoughts. In: Bondarenko, D.M., Kowalewski, S.A., Small, D.B. (eds) The Evolution of Social Institutions. World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51437-2_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51437-2_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51436-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51437-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)