Abstract
After ten years that the debate on big data, computation and digital methods has been a contested epistemological terrain between some who were generally optimistic, and others who were generally critical, a large group of scholars, nowadays, supports an active commitment by social scientists to face the digital dimension of social inquiry. The progressive use of digital methods needs to be sustained by an abductive, intersubjective and plural epistemological framework that allows to profitably include big data and computation within the different paradigmatic traditions that coexist in our disciplines. In order to affirm this digital epistemology it is critical to adopt a methodological posture able to elaborate research designs with and against the digital, trying to exploit what digital techniques can give as added value, but going to test their reliability, alongside others techniques, including qualitative ones.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott, A. (2011). Google of the past. Do keywords really matter? Lecture of the Department of Sociology, Goldsmith, 15th March.
Aragona, B. (2017). New data science: The sociological point of view. In E. Amaturo, B. Aragona, M. Grassia, C. Lauro, & M. Marino (Eds.), Data science and social research: Epistemology, methods, technology and applications. Heidelberg: Springer.
Aragona, B., & Felaco, C. (2018). The socio-technical construction of algorithms. The Lab’s Quarterly, 44(6), 27–42.
Aragona, B., Felaco, C., & Marino, M. (2018). The politics of Big Data assemblages. Partecipazione e conflitto, XI,(2), 448–471.
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.
Chandler, J., Rosenzweig, C., & Moss, A. J. (2019). Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2022–2038.
Conte, R. (2016). Big Data: un’opportunità per le scienze sociali? Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, CIX, 18–27.
Conte, R., Gilbert, N., Bonelli, G., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Deffuant, G., Kertesz, J., et al. (2012). Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics CCXIV, 325–346.
Daniels, J., & Gregory, K. (Eds.). (2016). Digital sociologies. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M. H., Patel, R. S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M. S., & Brilliant, L. (2009). Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature CDLVII, 7232, 1012.
Goel, S., Hofman, J. M., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D. M., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Predicting consumer behavior with Web search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(41), 17486–17490.
Halford, S., Pope, C., & Weal, M. (2013). Digital futures? Sociological Challenges and opportunities in the emergent semantic web. Sociology XLVII, 1, 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512453798
Halford, S., & Savage, M. (2017). Speaking sociologically with big data: Symphonic social science and the future for big data research. Sociology, LI(6), 1132–1148.
Iliadis, A., & Russo, F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society, I(2), 1–8.
Kitchin, R. (2014a). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, I(1), 1–12.
Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big Data Open Data Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. London: Sage.
Kitchin, R., & Lauriault, T. P. (2015). Small data in the era of big data. GeoJournal, 80(4), 463–476.
Lazer, D., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Fowler, J., & King, G. (2009). Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science CCCXXIII, 5915, 721–723.
Lupton, D. (2014). Digital sociology. London: Routledge.
Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research. New York: Wiley.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2012). Big Data: A revolution that transforms how we work, live, and think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe (IL): Free Press.
Orton-Johnson, K., & Prior (a cura di), N. (2013). Digital sociology: Critical perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer.
O’Sullivan, D. (2017). Big Data: why (oh why?) this computational social science? www.escholarship.org. Accessibile all’URL https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rn5n832. Ultimo accesso 1 febbraio 2018.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S., & (a cura di), . (1883). Studies in logic, Boston (MA). Brown and Company: Little.
Rogers, R. (2013), Digital methods. Cambridge (MA): MIT press.
Ruppert, E. (2013). Rethinking empirical social sciences. Dialogues in Human Geography, III(3), 268–273.
Salganik, M. J. (2018). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. London: Princeton.
Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899.
Torabi Asr, F., & Taboada, M. (2019). Big Data and quality data for fake news and misinformation detection. Big Data & Society, 6(1).
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Amaturo, E., Aragona, B. (2021). Digital Methods and the Evolution of the Epistemology of Social Sciences. In: Mariani, P., Zenga, M. (eds) Data Science and Social Research II. DSSR 2019. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51222-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51222-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51221-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51222-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)