Abstract
For decades and all around the world, the main goal of industries is financial and economic profit. Lately, new approaches additionally aim to better the operator’s working conditions. With the help of simulation, these approaches can be tested in a much cheaper, faster and easier manner before real-life implementation. In this paper, new strategies have been tested to improve working conditions for the operator while maintaining high performance and productivity. The implementation of human factors and margins of maneuver into a production system is explored to improve working conditions through non-productive times. One main non-productive time is considered: unnecessary movement. A model describing a real-life scenario is suggested, as well as strategies to reduce and leverage non-productive times.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rivera, L., Chen, F.F.: Measuring the impact of Lean tools on the cost–time investment of a product using cost–time profiles 23, 684–689 (2007)
El Mouayni, I., Etienne, A., Siadat, A., Dantan, J., Lux, A.: AEN-PRO: Agent-based simulation tool for performance and working conditions assessment in production systems using workers’ margins of manoeuver. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1), 14236–14241 (2017)
Abubakar, M.I., Wang, Q.: Key human factors and their effects on human centered assembly performance. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 69, 48–57 (2019)
Phillips, R.O.: What is fatigue and how does it affect the safety performance of human transport operators? (2014)
Petronijevic, J., Etienne, A., Dantan, J.: Human factors under uncertainty: a manufacturing systems design using simulation-optimisation approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 127, 665–676 (2019)
Digiesi, S., Kock, A.A.A., Mummolo, G., Rooda, J.E.: The effect of dynamic worker behavior on flowline performance. IFAC Proc. 39(3), 341–346 (2006)
Lanfranchi, J.B., Duveau, A.: Explicative models of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD): from biomechanical and psychosocial factors to clinical analysis of ergonomics. Rev. Eur. Psychol. Appl. 58(4), 201–213 (2008)
El Mouayni, I., Etienne, A., Dantan, J., Lux, A.: Développement d ’ une méthode outillée pour l ’ amélioration des aspects santé-sécurité dès les premières phases de la conception des systèmes de production par la prise en compte des marges de manœuvre temporelles (2018)
Ebert, P., Freibichler, W.: Nudge management: applying behavioural science to increase knowledge worker productivity. J. Organ. Des. 6(1), 4 (2017)
Ghobakhloo, M.: Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 252, 119869 (2020)
Givi, Z.S., Jaber, M.Y., Neumann, W.P.: Modelling worker reliability with learning and fatigue. Appl. Math. Model. 39(17), 5186–5199 (2015)
Jaber, M.Y., Givi, Z.S., Neumann, W.P.: Incorporating human fatigue and recovery into the learning-forgetting process. Appl. Math. Model. 37(12–13), 7287–7299 (2013)
Kolus, A., Wells, R., Neumann, P.: Production quality and human factors engineering: a systematic review and theoretical framework. Appl. Ergon. 73, 55–89 (2018)
Neumann, W.P., Kolus, A., Wells, R.W.: Human factors in production system design and quality performance—a systematic review. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12), 1721–1724 (2016)
El Mouayni, I., Etienne, A., Siadat, A., Dantan, J., Lux, A.: A simulation-based approach for enhancing health aspects in production systems by integrating work margins. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12), 1697–1702 (2016)
El Mouayni, I., Etienne, A., Lux, A., Siadat, A., Dantan, J.: A simulation-based approach for time allowances assessment during production system design with consideration of worker’s fatigue, learning and reliability. Comput. Ind. Eng. 139, 105650 (2020)
Low, S.N., Chong, S.H., Sim, H.Y., Razalli, S., Kamaruddin, S.: Measurement of overall performance effectiveness in setup improvement. J. Ind. Eng. 2014, 1–7 (2014)
Stamatis, D.H.: The OEE Primer: Understanding Overall Equipment Effectiveness, Reliability, and Maintainability (2010)
Manotas Duque, D.F., Cadavid, L.R.: Lean manufacturing measurement: the relationship between lean activities and lean metrics. Estud. Gerenciales 23(105), 69–83 (2007)
Garre, P., Nikhil Bharadwaj, V.V.S., Shiva Shashank, P., Harish, M., Sai Dheeraj, M.: Applying lean in aerospace manufacturing. Mater. Today Proc. 4(8), 8439–8446 (2017)
Foulloy, L., Clivillé, V., Berrah, L.: A fuzzy temporal approach to the Overall Equipment Effectiveness measurement. Comput. Ind. Eng. 127, 103–115 (2019)
Singh, R., Shah, D.B., Gohil, A.M., Shah, M.H.: Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) calculation—automation through hardware & software development. Procedia Eng. 51, 579–584 (2013)
Badiger, A.S., Gandhinathan, R.: A proposal: evaluation of OEE and impact of six big losses on equipment earning capacity. Int. J. Process Manag. Benchmarking 2(3), 234–248 (2008)
Bozejko, W., Hejducki, Z., Wodecki, M.: Flowshop scheduling of construction processes with uncertain parameters. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 19(1), 194–204 (2019)
Majid, M.A., Fakhreldin, M., Zuhairi, K.Z.: Comparing Discrete Event and Agent Based Simulation in Modelling Human Behaviour at Airport Check-in Counter, vol. 1, pp. 510–522
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taleb, I., Etienne, A., Siadat, A. (2021). Production Systems Simulation Considering Non-productive Times and Human Factors. In: Masrour, T., Cherrafi, A., El Hassani, I. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Applications. A2IA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51186-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51186-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51185-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51186-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)