Skip to main content

Utilizing Breakthrough Innovations: The Need for Information Sharing as a New Key Performance Indicator for Container Port Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Collaborative Logistics and Intermodality
  • 523 Accesses

Abstract

As a response to higher customer demand and increased competition, innovations in port operations is of concern for port customers and port operators. The growth in world trade is doubling every 5–7 years with a corresponding increase in cargo container movements, most of which are handled by seaports. Moving more traffic through the limited area of a seaport can only be achieved by an increase in port performance. Shipowners, terminal operators and forwarding agents each have optimized their performance guided by values collected on key performance indicators. The purpose of this chapter is to contribute to the understanding of the use of key performance indicators as a mean to drive port innovations. We argue that the use of standard key performance indicators leaves ports in the region of incremental innovations with a diminishing rate of return of investments, missing out on the potential efficiency growth by breakthrough innovations. Our results from a case study at Oslo port shows that operations suffer from a lack of information sharing resulting in an unused potential, not captured by the current performance indicators. We propose a new Information Sharing Indicator to motivate and guide ports in adopting breakthrough innovations for information sharing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Eraqi, A. S., Mustafa, A., Khader, A. T., & Barros, C. P. (2008). Efficiency of Middle Eastern and East African seaports: application of DEA using window analysis. European Journal of Scientific Research, 23(4), 597–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. (1999). The hunt for S-shaped growth paths in technological innovation: a patent study. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(4), 487–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C. P. (2012). Productivity assessment of African seaports. African Development Review, 24(1), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C. P., Felício, J. A., & Fernandes, R. L. (2012). Productivity analysis of Brazilian seaports. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(5), 503–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, G. (2013). Face to face interview with Geir Berg. In N. Lin (Ed).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015, December). What is disruptive innovations? Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. (2010). The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches. OR Spectrum, 32(3), 717–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K., Song, D. -W., Ji, P., & Wang, T. -F. (2004). An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production efficiency. Review of Network Economics, 3(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G., & Turner, M. A. (2012). Urban growth and transportation. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(4), 1407–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatteland, C. J. (2013). Face to face interview with Carl Johan Hatteland. In N. Lin (Ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, S.-W., Lu, W.-M., & Wang, T.-P. (2010). Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 706–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jager, B., & Hjelle, H. M. (2015) Handling multi-party complexities in container flows in the upstream oil and gas supply chain: Potential lessons for an application to intercontinental container supply chains. In Transportation information and safety (ICTIS), 2015 international conference on, 2015 (pp. 661–668). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbach, J. (2015). Clarifying innovation: Four zones of innovation. Experiencing information [Accessed: 10.1.2017].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmar Container Handling Systems. (2015). Container handling systems brochure. http://www.rrtobe.com/salesmaterial_store_pdf_low_res/CHS_KIOY0309E-17.pdf

  • Kasypi, M., & Shah, M. (2013). Malmquist productivity index for container terminal. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koçoğlu, İ., İmamoğlu, S. Z., İnce, H., & Keskin, H. (2011). The effect of supply chain integration on information sharing: Enhancing the supply chain performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1630–1649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L., So, K. C., & Tang, C. S. (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science, 46(5), 626–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2013). Port performance: Models and metrics supporting performance evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R., Liu, J., Wan, Y.-W., & Zhang, C. (2007). Predicting the performance of container terminal operations using artificial neural networks. In K. Bichou, H. M. G. Bell, & A. Evans (Eds.), Risk management in port operations, logistics and supply-chain security (pp. 117–134). London: Informa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madland, O. (2013). Unstructured telephone interview with Olav Madland. In N. Lin (Ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E., & Winkelmans, W. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy & Management, 28(1), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, P. B., Hvolby, H.-H., & Dukovska-Popovska, I. (2012). Enabling information sharing in a port. In IFIP international conference on advances in production management systems (pp. 152–159). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, P. B., Damgaard, C. M., Hvolby, H. -H., Dukovska-Popovska, I., & Sommer, A. F. (2014). Framework for information sharing in a small-to-medium port system supply chain. In IFIP international conference on advances in production management systems (pp. 257–264). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacificmarine. (2013). How do container ships work? http://www.pacificmarine.net/marine-deck/cargo-securing/how-do-container-ships-work.htm.

  • PoShCoP. (2015). The port-ship coordinated planning project, supported by the Norwegian Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo, D., & Olhager, J. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 514–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schøyen, H., & Odeck, J. (2013). The technical efficiency of Norwegian container ports: A comparison to some Nordic and UK container ports using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15(2), 197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • SmartPort. (2014). Action Plan towards the SMART PORT concept in the Mediterranean Area, EU Project by Andalusian Institute of Technology, University of Cádiz, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, and Prometni Institut Ljubljana, supported by European Regional Development Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydney’s Patrick terminal goes automated, with fewer staff but dancing robots. (2015, June 18). The Sydney Morning Herald.

    Google Scholar 

  • To, H. (2006, May 16). The next big trend and the “double merit” scenario. SafeHaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, S. H., Pettit, S. J., & Beresford, A. K. C. (2008, September). A new port performance measurement framework in a changing logistics environment. In Proceedings of the LRN 2008 annual conference (Vol. 6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, S. H., Pettit, S., & Beresford, A. K. (2011). Port evolution and performance in changing logistics environments. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 13(3), 250–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y.-C. J., & Goh, M. (2010). Container port efficiency in emerging and more advanced markets. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(6), 1030–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, F., & Wang, Z. (2013). Effects of information technology alignment and information sharing on supply chain operational performance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65(3), 370–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, A. C. -l., Zhang, A., & Cheung, W. (2013). Foreign participation and competition: A way to improve the container port efficiency in China? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 220–231.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bjorn Jager .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jager, B., Lin, N. (2021). Utilizing Breakthrough Innovations: The Need for Information Sharing as a New Key Performance Indicator for Container Port Operations. In: Hernández, J.E., Li, D., Jimenez-Sanchez, J.E., Cedillo-Campos, M.G., Wenping, L. (eds) Collaborative Logistics and Intermodality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50958-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics