Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bearding the Lion: Reforming Assessment in Junior Cycle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Curriculum Change within Policy and Practice

  • 387 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses the most contested aspect of junior cycle reform in Ireland, a dispute about assessment that, more than once, threatened to derail the entire reform initiative. The analysis highlights broad agreement about limitations of the existing system, about the need for change and the importance of assessment in ensuring educational quality. The difficulties encountered in agreeing the specific nature of change are highlighted, reflecting a sociocultural approach that considers the debate from the differing perspectives of stakeholders. This chapter outlines student assessment and certification at lower secondary level internationally and highlights the rationale for reform in the Irish case, arguments shaped by domestic and international factors. Tensions between the formative and summative components in the Irish reforms reveal how initial positivity towards the former did not translate into acceptance of fundamental change in the latter. This chapter also explores the debate about the role of teachers in grading the work of their own students for certification purposes, outlining how the agreement eventually reached, while introducing some element of school-based assessment, left in place a system of external exams with a potential impact on teaching and learning not wholly different from what it was intended to replace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTI (Association of Secondary Teachers, Ireland). (2013). Teachers’ voice. Report of ASTI Convention with Teachers on the Junior Cycle Reform Document ‘A framework for Junior cycle.’ Dublin: ASTI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Lessons from around the world: How policies, politics and cultures constrain and afford assessment practices. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. T. L., & Hattie, J. A. (2012). The benefits of regular standardized assessment in childhood education: Guiding improved instruction and learning. In S. Suggate & E. Reese (Eds.), Contemporary debates in childhood education and development (pp. 287–292). Abingdon UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEB (Curriculum and Examinations Board). (1984a). Issues and structures in Irish education: A consultative document. Dublin: CEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEB (Curriculum and Examinations Board). (1984b). In our schools: A framework for curriculum and assessment. Dublin: CEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEB (Curriculum and Examinations Board). (1986). In our schools: a framework for curriculum and assessment. Dublin: Curriculum and Examinations Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cros, F. (2009). Country case study: France. In B. Vlaardingerbroek & N. Taylor (Eds.), Secondary school external examination systems (pp. 15–28). Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (1974). The I. C. E. report: Final report of the committee on the form and function of the intermediate certificate examination. Dublin: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Science). (1995). Charting our education future. White paper on education. Dublin: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Science). (1999). The junior certificate: Issues for discussion. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Skills). (2011). Literacy and numeracy for learning and life. The national strategy to improve literacy and numeracy among children and young people 2011–2020. Dublin: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Skills). (2012). A framework for junior cycle. Dublin: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Skills). (2015a). Framework for junior cycle 2015. Dublin: Author. Retrieved from http://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/Framework-for-Junior-Cycle-2015.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (Department of Education and Skills). (2015b). Retention rates of pupils in second level schools. 2008 entry cohort. Dublin: DES. Retrieved from http://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Statistics/Statistical-Reports/Retention-Rates-of-Pupils-in-Second-Level-Schools-2008-Cohort.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. ( 2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union 31.12.2006. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32006H0962.

  • Faragher, S. (2014). Understanding assessment in primary education. London: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Ireland. (1992). Education for a changing world. Green paper on education. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbert, J. (2011). Reform of junior certificate syllabus. Discussion with National Council for curriculum and assessment. Proceedings of the Joint Committee on Jobs, Social Protection and Education, Houses of the Oireachtas [Irish parliament], 15 November 2011. Retrieved from http://debates.oireachtas.ie/committees/2011/FA.asp.

  • Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning—Tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J., McGuinness, S., & Murphy, D. (1980). The public examinations evaluation project: The final report. Dublin: Department of Education, Trinity College Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, T. (2018). Setting standards in national examinations: What we have learnt? In J. Baird, T. Isaacs, D. Opposs, & L. Gray (Eds.), Examination standards. How measures and meanings differ around the world (pp. 331–343). London: UCL IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaghan, T., & Greaney, V. (2020). Public examinations examined. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1418-1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Looney, J. (2011). Integrating formative and summative assessment: Progress toward a seamless system?, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 58, OECD Publishing, Paris, Retrieved from www.oecd.org/edu/workingpapers.

  • Looney, J. (2018). Are student assessments fit for their purposes? European Journal of Education, 53(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysaght, Z., Scully, D., Murchan, D., O’Leary, G., & Shiel, G. (2019). Aligning assessment, learning and teaching in curricular reform and implementation. Report prepared for National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Dublin. Retrieved from https://www.ncca.ie/media/3925/aligning-assessment-learning-and-teaching-in-curricular-reform-and-implementation.pdf.

  • Madaus, G. F., & Macnamara, J. (1970). Public examinations: A study of the Irish leaving certificate. Dublin: St. Patrick’s College, Educational Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. (2011). Student standardised testing: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 65. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg3rp9qbnr6-en.

  • Murchan, D. (2015, May 25). Can a dual-currency solution deliver genuine junior cert reform. Irish Independent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murchan, D. (2018). Introducing school-based assessment as part of junior cycle reform in Ireland: A bridge too far? Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability, 30(2), 97–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murchan, D., & Shiel, G. (2017). Understanding and applying assessment in education. London: SAGE Publications Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Murchan, D. (2020a, May 11). With calculated grades trust in teachers and schools must take centre stage. Irish Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/with-calculated-grades-trust-in-teachers-and-schools-must-take-centre-stage-39195366.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Murchan, D. (2020b, September 8). Standardisation of Leaving Cert grades happens each year - but usually far from the spotlight. Irish Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/standardisation-of-leaving-cert-grades-happens-each-year-but-usually-far-from-the-spotlight-39512878.html

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Convention. (1994). Report on the national education convention. Dublin: National Education Convention Secretariat/Government of Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). (1993). A programme for reform. Curriculum and assessment policy towards the new century. Dublin: NCCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). (1999). The junior cycle review. Progress report: Issues and options for development. Dublin: NCCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). (2004). Update on the junior cycle review. Dublin: NCCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). (2010). Innovation and identity. Ideas for a new junior cycle. Dublin: NCCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCCA (National Council for Curriculum and Assessment). (2011). Towards a framework for junior cycle. Dublin: NCCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Caollai, É. (2019, November 13). Teachers criticise new junior cycle Irish exam. Irish Independent.. Retrieved from https://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/teachers-criticise-new-junior-cycle-irish-exam-1.4082139.

  • OECD. (1991). Reviews of national policies for education: Ireland. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010), PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf.

  • OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning. An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019) Education at a glance 2019—Data and methodology. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/educationataglance2019-dataandmethodology.htm.

  • Ofqual. (2013). Reforms to GCSEs in England from 2015 summary. Retrieved from https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20141110161452/http://comment.ofqual.gov.uk/gcse-reform-june-2013/.

  • Perkins, R., Moran, G., Cosgrove, J., & Shiel, G. (2010). PISA 2009: The performance and progress of 15-year-olds in Ireland—Summary report. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, R. P. (2012). The effect of testing on student achievement, 1910–2010. International Journal of Testing, 12(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2011.602920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnam-Lim, C. T. L., & Tan, K. H. T. (2015). Large-scale implementation of formative assessment practices in an examination-oriented culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEAB (Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board). (2020). About GCE O-Level., Retrieved from https://www.seab.gov.sg/home/examinations/gce-o-level/about-gce-o-level.

  • Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E., & Banks, J. (2012). High stakes testing and student perspectives on teaching and learning in the Republic of Ireland. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E., McCoy, S., & Darmody, M. (2004). Moving up: The experiences of first year students in post-primary school. Dublin: ESRI and NCCA in association with Liffey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E., Dunne, A., Darmody, M., & McCoy, S. (2006). Pathways through the junior cycle. Dublin: ESRI and NCCA in association with Liffey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E., Dunne, A., Darmody, M., & McCoy, S. (2007). Gearing up for the exam: The experience of junior certificate students. Dublin: ESRI and NCCA in association with Liffey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TUI. (2014). New minister must negotiate meaningfully with teachers on junior cycle. Press release (1 August 2014), Retrieved from tui.ie/press-releases/new-minister-must-negotiate-meaningfully-with-teachers-on-junior-cycle.5800.html.

  • TUI, ASTI & DES. (2015). Junior cycle reform. Joint Statement on Principles and Implementation. Report.Retrieved from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Education-Reports/Junior-Cycle-Reform-Joint-Statement-on-Principles-and-Implementation.pdf.

  • Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Damian Murchan

Authors
  1. Damian Murchan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damian Murchan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Damian Murchan

  2. School of Education, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Keith Johnston

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Murchan, D. (2021). Bearding the Lion: Reforming Assessment in Junior Cycle. In: Murchan, D., Johnston, K. (eds) Curriculum Change within Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50707-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50707-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50706-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50707-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation