Skip to main content

Malignant Gliomas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
CyberKnife NeuroRadiosurgery
  • 659 Accesses

Abstract

Malignant gliomas include some of the most aggressive and lethal brain tumor entities in adults, and the treatment of recurrent tumors and gliomas in eloquent anatomical locations remains challenging. Stereotactic radiosurgery presents a safe and effective noninvasive salvage therapy for these cases. Tightly focused external photon beams used in radiosurgery allow for high accuracy in delivering high doses to small target volumes, thus reducing therapy-related side effects to surrounding brain tissue. While investigations of SRS for newly diagnosed malignant gliomas have shown it to be a feasible and safe treatment, benefits in progression-free and overall survival are more pronounced in recurrent gliomas treated with radiosurgery. Factors that potentially influence survival after SRS treatment in malignant gliomas include patient age, performance status, total dose, dose per fraction, and number of fractions. In other rare entities such as brain stem or optic pathway gliomas, SRS presents a feasible and safe treatment alternative with potential survival benefits. Combined approaches, such as using radiosurgery in conjunction with “dose-dense” temozolomide chemotherapy or simultaneous application of angiogenesis-inhibitors, yield a potential radiosensitization effect and increased cytotoxicity for tumor cells. While treatment-associated toxicity such as radiation necrosis presents a possible complication after CyberKnife treatment, the incidence reported is very small, and careful planning and management can minimize the risk of radiation toxicity.

In conclusion, despite occasional incidence of treatment-induced toxicity, SRS represents a safe and feasible option to treat patients with recurrent malignant glioma or gliomas in proximity to critical structures with low complication rates and potential survival benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ostrom QT, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008–2012. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(Suppl 4):iv1–iv62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wirsching H-G, Galanis E. Glioblastoma. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Berger MS, Weller M, eds. 2016. San Diego: Elsevier. pp. 381–97

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mallick S, et al. Management of glioblastoma after recurrence: a changing paradigm. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2016;28(4):199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bucholz RD, Laycock KA, Cuff LE. CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial neoplasms, with a focus on malignant tumors. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2010;9(6):541–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pinzi V, et al. Radiosurgery reirradiation for high-grade glioma recurrence: a retrospective analysis. Neurol Sci. 2015;36(8):1431–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oermann E, et al. CyberKnife enhanced conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for high grade glioma in close proximity to critical structures. J Hematol Oncol. 2010;3:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Canazza A, et al. Increased migration of a human glioma cell line after in vitro CyberKnife irradiation. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;12(7):629–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Canazza A, et al. In vitro effects of Cyberknife-driven intermittent irradiation on glioblastoma cell lines. Neurol Sci. 2011;32(4):579–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshikawa K, et al. CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with malignant glioma. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006;49(2):110–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Villavicencio AT, et al. Survival following stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a multicenter experience. Neurosurg Rev. 2009;32(4):417–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lipani JD, et al. Survival following CyberKnife radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2008;7(3):249–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levy S, et al. Reirradiation of gliomas under stereotactic conditions: prognostic factors for survival without relapse or side effects, a retrospective study at Tours Regional University Hospital (France). Cancer Radiother. 2017;21(8):759–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Adachi K, et al. Feasibility of salvage re-irradiation with stereotactic radiotherapy for recurrent Glioma using CyberKnife. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(6):2935–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi W, et al. Salvage fractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (FSRT) for patients with recurrent high grade gliomas progressed after bevacizumab treatment. J Neuro-Oncol. 2018;137(1):171–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang J, et al. Clinical efficacy of CyberKnife radiosurgery for adult brainstem glioma: 10 years experience at Tianjin CyberKnife center and review of the literature. Front Oncol. 2019;9:257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uslu N, et al. Optic nerve glioma treatment with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;11(5):596–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Conti A, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of CyberKnife re-irradiation and “dose dense” temozolomide for recurrent gliomas. Acta Neurochir. 2012;154(2):203–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ekici K, et al. Efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy as salvage treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas. J BUON. 2014;19(4):1029–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasan S, et al. Salvage fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a single institution experience. Front Oncol. 2015;5:106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato K, et al. Radiation necrosis and brain edema association with CyberKnife treatment. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;86:513–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vordermark D, et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation: treatment option in recurrent malignant glioma. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yazici G, et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2014;120(1):117–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Loebel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Loebel, F. (2020). Malignant Gliomas. In: Conti, A., Romanelli, P., Pantelis, E., Soltys, S., Cho, Y., Lim, M. (eds) CyberKnife NeuroRadiosurgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50668-1_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics