Abstract
The recent development of ultrasound contrast agents adds to the utility of ultrasound, with improved diagnosis and patient management. All modes of ultrasound, including B-mode, spectral and colour Doppler techniques have well-known artefacts, some diminishing the image, others easily rectified when recognised and others used to the advantage of image interpretation. There are multiple recognised artefacts with the use of ultrasound contrast agents, nearly all new to even the experienced practitioner. A recognition and understanding of these artefacts are crucial to improving the image, obtaining diagnostic images and ultimately aiding the diagnosis. The ability to minimise these artefacts will be crucial in this process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Food & Drug Administration. Approved drug product list, Mar 2016. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/developmentapprovalprocess/ucm071120.pdf
Forsberg F, Liu JB, Burns PN, Merton DA, Goldberg BB. Artifact in ultrasonic contrast agents studies. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13:357–65.
Schneider M. The past, present and future of ultrasound contrast agents. La Chimica e l’Industria. 2000;82:1–6.
Greis C. Technical aspects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations: tips and tricks. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2014;58:89–95.
Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Greis C. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol. 2011;49:350–6.
Fetzer DT, Rafailidis V, Peterson C, Grant EG, Sidhu P, Barr RG. Artifacts in contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pictorial essay. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43:977–97.
Hindi APC, Peterson C, Barr RG. Artifacts in diagnostic ultrasound. Rep Med Imag. 2013;6:29–48.
Schneider M. Characteristics of SonoVue. Echocardiography. 1999;16:743–6.
Blomley MJK, Albrecht T, Cosgrove DO, Eckersley RJ, Butler-Barnes J, Jayaram V, et al. Stimulated acoustic emission to image a late liver and spleen-specific phase of Levovist in normal volunteers and patients with and without liver disease. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25:1341–52.
Kono Y, Pinnell SP, Sirlin CB, Sparks SR, Georgy B, Wong W, et al. Carotid arteries: contrast-enhanced US angiography—preliminary clinical experience. Radiology. 2004;230:561–8.
Sidhu PS, Allan PL, Cattin F, Cosgrove DO, Davies AH, Do DD, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of SonoVue(R), a second generation contrast agent, in the assessment of extracranial carotid or peripheral arteries using colour and spectral Doppler ultrasound: a multicentre study. Br J Radiol. 2006;79:44–51.
Marshall MM, Beese RC, Muiesan P, Sarma DI, O’Grady J, Sidhu PS. Assessment of portal venous patency in the liver transplant candidate: a prospective study comparing ultrasound, microbubble-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound with arteriography and surgery. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:377–83.
Bartels E, Bittermann HJ. Transcranial contrast imaging of cerebral perfusion in patients with space-occupying intracranial lesions. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:499–507.
Gutberlet M, Venz S, Neuhaus R, Ehrenstein T, Lemke AJ, Vogl AJ, et al. Contrast agent enhanced duplex ultrasonography: visualization of the hepatic artery after orthotopic transplantation. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1997;166:411–6.
Gutberlet M, Venz S, Zendel W, Hosten N, Felix R. Do ultrasonic contrast agents artificially increase maximum Doppler shift? In vivo study of human common carotid arteries. J Ultrasound Med. 1998;17(2):97–102.
Frinking P, Segers T, Luan Y, Tranquart F. Three decades of ultrasound contrast agents: a review of the past, present and future improvements. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46(4):892–908.
Blomley MJK, Sidhu PS, Cosgrove DO, Albrecht T, Harvey CJ, Heckemann RA, et al. Do different types of liver lesions differ in their uptake of the microbubble contrast agent SH U 508A in the late liver phase? Early experience. Radiology. 2001;220:661–7.
Bryant TH, Blomley MJ, Albrecht T, Sidhu PS, Leen ELS, Basilico R, et al. Improved characterization of liver lesions with liver-phase uptake of liver-specific microbubbles: prospective multicenter study. Radiology. 2004;232:799–809.
Edey AJ, Ryan SM, Beese RC, Gordon P, Sidhu PS. Ultrasound imaging of liver metastases in the delayed parenchymal phase following administration of Sonazoid (TM) using a destructive mode technique (Agent Detection Imaging (TM)). Clin Radiol. 2008;63:1112–20.
Yusuf GT, Fang C, Huang DY, Sellars ME, Deganello A, Sidhu PS. Endocavitary contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): a novel problem solving technique. Insights Imaging. 2018;9:303–11.
Deganello A, Sellars ME, Yusuf GT, Sidhu PS. How much should i record during a CEUS examination? Practical aspects of the real-time feature of a contrast ultrasound study. Ultraschall Med. 2018;39(5):484–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sidhu, P.S., Yusuf, G.T., Fang, C., Rafailidis, V. (2021). Artifacts in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Examinations. In: Sidhu, P., Sellars, M., Deganello, A. (eds) Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Pediatric Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49691-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49691-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49690-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49691-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)