Skip to main content

Methods to Analyze Negotiation Processes

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation

Abstract

Negotiation processes evolve simultaneously along several dimensions. They have a substantive dimension, which deals with the issues to be resolved in the negotiation, a communication dimension reflecting the different tactics negotiators use to provide information, build a relationship and influence each other, and an emotional dimension, in which negotiators can influence each other even without explicitly communicating their emotions. In the last decades, negotiation researchers have developed several methods to study these different process dimensions individually, which are reviewed in this chapter. Creating an integrated perspective combining two or all three dimensions is an important next step, and the approach for this integration is also presented. Recent advances in information technology, data mining, and artificial intelligence could contribute to a more thorough analysis of negotiation processes to enable new insights in negotiation research, and also as tools that support negotiators by analyzing negotiation processes in real time. These approaches are presented in the concluding part of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adair WL, Brett JM (2005) The negotiation dance: time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organ Sci 16(1):33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlert M, Sträter KF (2016) Refining Raiffa’s aspiration adaptation within the zone of possible agreements. Ger Econ Rev 17(3):298–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1980) Effective choice in the Prisoner’s dilemma. J Confl Resolut 24(2):3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baber WW (2018) Identifying macro phases across the negotiation lifecycle. Group Decis Negot 27(6):885–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry B, Fulmer I, Van Kleef G (2004) I laughed, I cried, I settled: the role of emotion in negotiation. In: Gelfand M, Brett J (eds) The handbook of negotiation and culture. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, pp 71–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman MH, Curhan JR, Moore DA, Valley KL (2000) Negotiation. Annu Rev Psychol 51:279–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brett JM, Shapiro DL, Lytle AL (1998) Breaking the bonds of reciprocity in negotiations. Acad Manag J 41(4):410–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett J, Weingart L, Olekalns M (2003) Baubles, bangles, and beads: modeling the evolution of negotiating groups over time. In: Blount S, Mannix B, Neale M (eds) Time in groups, vol 6. Research in Managing Groups and Teams. Emerald, Bingley, pp 39–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett JM, Olekalns M, Friedman R, Goates N, Anderson C, Lisco CC (2007) Sticks and stones: language, face, and online dispute resolution. Acad Manag J 50(1):85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman W-P, Broekens J, Jonker CM, Meyer J-JC (2009) Getting a grip on emotions in negotiations: the possibilities of ICT. In: 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM international joint conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology, Milan, Italy. IEEE, pp 345–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Buelens M, Poucke DV (2004) Determinants of negotiator’s initial opening offer. J Bus Psychol 19(1):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon JK, Hale JL (1984) The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Commun Monogr 51(3):193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonneau RA, Vahidov RM (2014) A utility concession curve data fitting model for quantitative analysis of negotiation styles. Expert Syst Appl 41(9):4035–4042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curhan JR, Pentland A (2007) Thin slices of negotiation: predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. J Appl Psychol 92(3):802–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darics E (2013) Non-verbal signalling in digital discourse: the case of letter repetition. Discourse Context Media 2(3):141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehtamo H, Hämäläinen RP (2001) Interactive multiple-criteria methods for reaching Pareto optimal agreements in negotiations. Group Decis Negot 10(6):475–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faratin P, Sierra C, Jennings NR (1998) Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robot Auton Syst 24:159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filzmoser M (2010) Automated vs. human negotiation. Int J Artif Intell 4(10):64–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Filzmoser M, Vetschera R (2008) A classification of bargaining steps and their impact on negotiation outcomes. Group Decis Negot 17(5):421–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filzmoser M, Rios J, Strecker S, Vetschera R (2010) The impact of analytical support and preference determination on consistency in E-negotiations-a new method and preliminary results. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 9(5):673–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filzmoser M, Hippmann P, Vetschera R (2016) Analyzing the multiple dimensions of negotiation processes. Group Decis Negot 25:1169–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filzmoser M, Koeszegi ST, Pfeffer G (2017) What computers can tell us about emotions – classification of affective communication in electronic negotiations by supervised machine learning. In: Bajwa D, Koeszegi ST, Vetschera R (eds) Group decision and negotiation – theory, empirical evidence, and application. Springer, Berlin, pp 113–123

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda NH (2009) Emotions, individual differences and time course: reflections. Cognit Emot 23(7):1444–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettinger J, Koeszegi S (2015) More than words: the effect of emoticons in electronic negotiations. In: Kaminski B, Kersten G, Szapiro T (eds) Outlooks and insights on group decision and negotiation. Springer, Berlin, pp 289–305

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griessmair M (2017) Ups and downs: emotional dynamics in negotiations and their effects on (in)equity. Group Decis Negot 26(6):1061–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griessmair M, Druckman D (2018) To match or not to match? Reactions to turning points in negotiation. Group Decis Negot 27(1):61–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griessmair M, Koeszegi ST (2009) Exploring the cognitive-emotional fugue in electronic negotiations. Group Decis Negot 18(3):213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindriks K, Jonker CM, Tykhonov D (2007) Negotiation dynamics: analysis, concession tactics, and outcomes. In: Lin TYTY, Bradshaw JM, Klusch M, Zhang C, Broder A, Ho H (eds) Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 427–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine M, Murphy S, Weber M, Kersten G (2009) The role of emotion and language in dyadic E-negotiations. Group Decis Negot 18(3):193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippmann P (2014) Multi-level dynamics of affective behaviors in text-based online negotiations: impacts on negotiation success and impacts of decision support. PhD thesis, University of Vienna,

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes ME (1992) Phase structures in negotiation. In: Putnam LL, Roloff ME (eds) Communication and negotiation. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 83–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker C, Hindriks K, Wiggers P, Broekens J (2012) Negotiating agents. AI Mag 33(3):79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic data analysis. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten GE, Vahidov R, Gimon D (2013) Concession-making in multi-attribute auctions and multi-bilateral negotiations: theory and experiments. Electron Commer Res Appl 12(3):166–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koeszegi S, Vetschera R (2010) Analysis of negotiation processes. In: Eden C, Kilgour DM (eds) Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 121–137

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koeszegi S, Pesendorfer E-M, Vetschera R (2011) Data-driven phase analysis of E-negotiations. Group Decis Negot 20:385–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal JB, Wish M (1978) Multidimensional scaling. Sage, Newbury Park

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (1997) The role of affect in negotiations an integrative overview. J Appl Behav Sci 33(1):84–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis M, Yarats D, Dauphin Y, Parikh D, Batra D (2017) Deal or no deal? End-to-end learning for negotiation dialogues. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05125

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring P (2000) Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual Soc Res 1:20

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran S, Ritov I (2002) Initial perceptions in negotiations: evaluation and response to ‘logrolling’ offers. J Behav Decis Mak 15(2):101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumpower JL (1991) The judgement policies of negotiators and the structure of negotiation problems. Manag Sci 37(10):1304–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olekalns M, Smith PL (2003) Social motives in negotiation: the relationships between dyad composition, negotiation processes and outcomes. Int J Confl Manag 14(3/4):233–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson G, Herbsleb J, Rueter H (1994) Characterizing the sequential structure of interactive behaviors through statistical and grammatical techniques. Hum Comput Interact 9:427–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam L, Jones T (1982) The role of communication in bargaining. Commun Mongr 49:262–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell JA (1980) A circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(6):1161–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakun MF (2005) Multi-bilateral multi-issue E-negotiation in E-commerce with a tit-for-tat computer agent. Group Decis Negot 14(5):383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolova M, Lapalme G (2012) How much do we say? Using informativeness of negotiation text records for early prediction of negotiation outcomes. Group Decis Negot 21(3):363–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srnka K, Koeszegi S (2007) From words to numbers – how to transform rich qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 59:29–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarnowski PKM, Majkowski A, Rak RJ (2017) Emotion recognition using facial expressions. Procedia Comput Sci 108:1175–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tausczik Y, Pennebaker J (2010) The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. J Lang Soc Psychol 29(1):24–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Te’eni D (2001) A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Q 25:251–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turel O (2010) Interdependence issues in analyzing negotiation data. Group Decis Negot 19:111–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psychol Rev 84(4):327–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleef G, De Dreu C, Manstead A (2010) An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: the emotions as social information model. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 42:45–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetschera R (2013) Negotiation processes: an integrated perspective. Euro J Decis Process 1(1–2):135–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetschera R (2016) Concessions dynamics in electronic negotiations – a cross-lagged regression analysis. Group Decis Negot 25:245–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetschera R, Filzmoser M (2012) Standardized interpolated path analysis of offer processes in E-negotiations. In: Kauffman RJ (ed) International conference on electronic commmerce ICEC 2012, Singapore, August 7–8, 2012, pp 134–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart LR, Olekalns M (2004) Communication processes in negotiation: frequencies, sequences, and phases. In: Gelfand M, JM B (eds) The handbook of negotiation and culture. University Press, Stanford, pp 143–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss S, Indurkhya N, Zhang N (2010) Fundamentals of predictive text mining. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R, Romero OJ, Rudnicky A (2018) Sogo: a social intelligent negotiation dialogue system. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on intelligent virtual agents, Sydney, Australia. pp 239–246

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolf Vetschera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Vetschera, R., Koeszegi, S.T., Filzmoser, M. (2021). Methods to Analyze Negotiation Processes. In: Kilgour, D.M., Eden, C. (eds) Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49629-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics