Skip to main content

On the Strength of the Uniform Fixed Point Principle in Intuitionistic Explicit Mathematics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Legacy of Kurt Schütte

Abstract

The paper is concerned with a line of research that plumbs the scope of constructive theories. The object of investigation here is Feferman’s intuitionistic theory of explicit mathematics augmented by the monotone fixed point principle which asserts that every monotone operation on classifications (Feferman’s notion of set) possesses a least fixed point. To be more precise, the new axiom not merely postulates the existence of a least solution, but, by adjoining a newfunctional constant to the language, it is ensured that a fixed point is uniformly presentable as a function of the monotone operation. The strength of the classical non-uniform version, MID, was investigated in [6] whereas that of the uniform version was determined in [16, 17] and shown to be that of subsystems of second order arithmetic based on \( \varPi_{2}^{1} \)-comprehension. This involved a rendering of \( \varPi_{2}^{1} \)-comprehension in terms of fixed points of non-monotonic \( \varPi_{1}^{1} \)-operators and a proof-theoretic interpretation of the latter in specific operator theories that can be interpreted in explicit mathematics with the uniform monotone fixed point principle. The intent of the current paper is to show that the same strength obtains when the underlying logic is taken to be intuitionistic logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Arnold and D. Niwinski. Rudiments of the μ-calculus. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Buchholz, S. Feferman, W. Pohlers, and W. Sieg. Iterated Inductive Definitions and Subsystems of Analysis, volume 897 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Feferman. A language and axioms for explicit mathematics. In Algebra and Logic, volume 450 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 87–139. Springer, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Feferman. Constructive theories of functions and classes. In J.N. Crossley, editor, Logic Colloquium’78, pages 159–224. North-Holland, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Feferman. Monotone inductive definitions. In A.S. Troelstra and D. van Dalen, editors, The L.E.J. Brouwer Centenary Symposium, pages 77–89. North-Holland, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Glaß, M. Rathjen, and A. Schlüter. The strength of monotone inductive definitions in explicit mathematics. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 85:1–46, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Hilbert and P. Bernays. Grundlagen der Mathematik II. Springer, Berlin, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Hitchcock and D. M. R. Park. Induction rules and termination proofs. In Procceedings of the 1st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, pages 225–251. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Kozen. Results on the propositional μ-calculus. Theoretical Computer Science, 27:333–354, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Kreisel. Generalized inductive definitions. In Stanford Report on the Foundations of Analysis Section III. Mimeographed, Stanford, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Lubarsky. μ-definable sets of integers. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58:291–313, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Möllerfeld. Generalized Inductive Definitions. The μ-calculus and \( \varPi_{2}^{1} \)-comprehension. Phd dissertation, Universität Münster, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. M. R. Park. Fixpoint induction and proof of program semantics. In Mitchie Meltzer, editor, Machine Intelligence V, pages 59–78. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Pratt. A decidable μ-calculus. In Proceedings 22nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 421–427. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Rathjen. Monotone inductive definitions in explicit mathematics. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 61:125–146, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Rathjen. Explicit mathematics with the monotone fixed point principle. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 63:509–542, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Rathjen. Explicit mathematics with the monotone fixed point principle II: Models. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 64:517–550, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Rathjen. Explicit mathematics with monotone inductive definitions: a survey. In W. Sieg et al., editor, Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics: Essays in Honor of Solomon Feferman, volume 15 of Lecture Notes in Logic, pages 329–346. ASL and AK Peters, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Scott and J.W. DeBakker. A theory of programs. Unpublished manuscript, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Takahashi. Monotone inductive definitions in a constructive theory of functions and classes. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 42:255–279, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Tupailo. Realization of constructive set theory into explicit mathematics: a lower bound for impredicative Mahlo universe. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 120:165–196, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Tupailo. On the intuitionistic strength of monotone inductive definitions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 69:790–798, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Rathjen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rathjen, M., Tupailo, S. (2020). On the Strength of the Uniform Fixed Point Principle in Intuitionistic Explicit Mathematics. In: Kahle, R., Rathjen, M. (eds) The Legacy of Kurt Schütte. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49424-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics