Skip to main content

Links and Demographic Comparisons to Conflict Management and Counterproductive Work Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intrapreneurship and Sustainable Human Capital

Abstract

According to contemporary theory in Management Science, conflicts are inevitable and necessary for organizations, indeed. Managing conflicts shows clearly differences between good and perfect managers and entrepreneurs. In this respect, conflict management styles are emerging as a meaningful tool for dealing with the counterproductive work behaviors which are anti-innovative behaviors. The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of conflict management on counterproductive work behavior and also make demographic comparisons to these variables. The sample is composed of 200 white-collar employees. Data were collected through survey technique with convenience sampling method and analyzed via statistical package programs. Results show that conflict management styles, integrating, dominating, and compromising, have significant effect on counterproductive work behavior dimensions. Integrating reduces organizational deviance, dominating increases interpersonal deviance, and compromising reduces both interpersonal and organizational deviance. Besides, perceptions about conflict management and counterproductive work behavior vary depending on demographic characteristics. Integrating is perceived mostly by female participants in comparison with males. Dominating is perceived mostly by private sector employees in comparison with public ones. Younger employees perceive conflict management and its two dimensions, obliging and compromising, more than their elders. Males are in tendency to behave counterproductive in comparison with females. Counterproductive work behavior and its one-dimensional, organizational deviance are performed less by younger employees and more by employees educated at post-graduate degree.

This study is the final version of the extended abstract that was published in proceeding book that belong to “IV. Orgutsel Davranis Kongresi” on Nov 4–5, 2016, Adana, Turkey. ISBN: 978–975–487-213-2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, K., & Ahmed, G. (2015). The relationships between conflict management styles, job satisfaction and organizational commitment among workers in public and private sectors. Universal Journal of Psycholog, 3(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujp.2015.030203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkirman, A. D. (1998). Etkin çatışma yönetimi ve müdahale stratejileri. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi IIBF Dergisi, 13(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akova, O. (2015). Yonetsel ve orgutsel etkinligi gelistirme yontemleri. In K. O. Ozer, M. Hiziroglu, & M. Saldamli (Eds.), Catisma yonetimi (pp. 516–541). Istanbul: Adra Yayincilik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, C. R. (2014). Corporate psychopaths, conflict, employee affective Well-being and counterproductive work behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1688-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. W., Huang, X., & Ng, P. M. (2008). Managers’ conflict management styles and employee attitudinal outcomes: The mediating role of trust. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(2), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-007-9037-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. C., & Zelihic, M. (2013). The study of conflict management among taiwanese adolescents. Life Science Journal, 10(3), 1231–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De-Dreu, C. K. W. (1997). Productive conflict: The importance of conflict management and conflict issue. In C. K. W. De-Dreu & E. Van De Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 9–52). New Delhi, Thousand oaks, London: SAGE. isbn:0-7619-5091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirican, A. H. (2013). Duygusal zekanin orgutsel vatandaslik davranisi ve uretkenlik karsiti davranislar uzerine etkisi. Master Thesis, Gebze High Technology Institute, Gebze. Institute of Social Science, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1971). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression, III. Biometrika, 58(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokcen-Kapusuz, A., & Cavus, M. F. (2017). Relationship between counterproductive behaviors and islamic work ethics. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(12), 153–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (2009). The effects of different conflict management styles on job satisfaction in rural healthcare settings. Economics & Business Journal: Inquiries & Perspectives, 2(1), 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gümüseli, A. İ. (1994). Izmir ilkogretim okullari yoneticilerinin ogretmenler ile aralarındaki catısmalari yonetme bicimleri. PhD Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara. Institute of Social Science, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanten, P., Yesiltas, M., & Arslan, R. (2015). Kişiligin karanlik yonunun uretkenlik karsiti is davranislarina etkisinde psikolojik sozlesmenin duzenleyici rolu. Ataturk Universitesi IIBF Dergisi, 29(2), 365–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karcioglu, F., & Aliogullari, Z. D. (2012). Catismanin nedenleri ve catisma yonetim tarzlari iliskisi. Ataturk Universitesi IIBF Dergisi, 26(3–4), 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karip, E. (1999). Catisma Yonetimi. Ankara: PegemA Yayincilik. isbn:975-6802-03-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S. R., Bruursema, K., Rodopman, B., & Spector, P. E. (2013). Leadership, interpersonal conflict, and counterproductive work behavior: An examination of the stressor–strain process. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocel, T. (2013). Isletme yoneticiligi (Yonetim ve organizasyon, organizasyonlarda davranıs, klasik-modern-cagdas ve guncel yaklasimlar). Istanbul: Beta Yayinevi. isbn: 978-605-377-573-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. (2004). Organizational response to conflict: Future conflict and work outcomes. Social Work Research, 28(3), 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnaly, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohbuchi, K. I., & Kitanaka, T. (1991). Effectiveness of power strategies in interpersonal conflict among Japanese students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(6), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1991.9924666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Europe, Middle East and Africa: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing. isbn:0-335-09865-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(3), 206–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A., & Buntzman, G. F. (1989). Supervisory power bases, styles of handling conflict with subordinates, and subordinate compliance and satisfaction. The Journal of Psychology, 123(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1989.10542976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A., & Magner, N. R. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A., Magner, N. R., & Shapiro, D. L. (2000). Do justice perceptions influence styles of handling conflict with supervisors?: What justice perceptions, precisely? International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E. (2003). Introduction to industrial/organizational psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. isbn:978-1429242295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P. (1978). “Conflict management” and “conflict resolution” are not synonymous terms. California Management Review, 21(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/256693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, M. S., Akgemci, T., & Celik, A. (1998). Davranis bilimlerine giris ve orgutlerde davranis. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim. isbn:975-591-034-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. M., Xie, J., & Dyer, B. (2000). Antecedents and consequences of marketing managers’ conflict-handling behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.1.50.17989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotile, W. M., & Sotile, M. O. (1999). How to shape positive relationships in medical practices and hospitals. (part 1: Conflict management). Physician Executive, 25(4), 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., & Chia, L. C. (1989). Conflict between managers and workers: The role of cooperation and competition. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1989.9711724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weider-Hatfield, D., & Hatfield, J. D. (1996). Superiors’ conflict management strategies and subordinate outcomes. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318996010002003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Fedai Çavuş .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Çavuş, M.F., Develi, A., Güğerçin, S. (2020). Links and Demographic Comparisons to Conflict Management and Counterproductive Work Behavior. In: Leitão, J., Nunes, A., Pereira, D., Ramadani, V. (eds) Intrapreneurship and Sustainable Human Capital. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49410-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics