Skip to main content

The Ontology of Change: Wang Bi’s Interpretation of the Yijing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dao Companion to Xuanxue 玄學 (Neo-Daoism)

Part of the book series: Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy ((DCCP,volume 14))

  • 567 Accesses

Abstract

In the history of Yijing commentaries, Wang Bi’s Commentary on the Changes of the Zhou Dynasty started a paradigm of interpretation that lasted for a century. This “Wang Bi paradigm” is significant because of the deployment of key Xuanxue concepts, such as being, non-being, oneness, and multitude, to discuss the sixty-four hexagrams. Viewing the hexagrams as symbols of time and space, Wang Bi offers a philosophical reading of the Yijing whereby the former manual of divination is transformed into a spirited meditation on the power of human beings in mastering their fate. In this chapter, I will explain how Wang Bi turns the hexagrams into metaphors of temporal and spatial narratives giving meaning to human condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Originally published in 1957, Tang’s work consists of seven groundbreaking articles in which he defined the characteristics of Xuanxue and the main features of Wang Bi’s commentaries on the Classic of Changes (Yijing 易經).

  2. 2.

    In the West, we extend Tang’s argument by calling Xuanxue “Neo-Daoism.” According to Wing-Tsit Chan, Xuanxue was Neo-Daoist not only because it was based on the interpretations of two Daoist texts, the Daodejing and Zhuangzi, but also because it was an attempt “to find reality beyond space and time” (Chan 1969: 316). In the same vein, Alan Chan suggests that Xuanxue scholars were Neo-Daoist because of their interest in “the perceived true meaning of Dao” that is beyond language and sensory perception (Chan 2009: 303).

  3. 3.

    Based on a close study of Zheng Xuan’s 鄭玄 (127–200 CE) Yijing commentary, Lin Zhongjun demonstrates that the cosmological studies at the end of the Eastern Han period already included a deep thinking of ontology. See Lin 2005, especially 121–138.

  4. 4.

    See Loewe 1986: 649–725, 726–746. See also Xu 1976, especially 295–438.

  5. 5.

    See Tang 2005: 123–177.

  6. 6.

    See Alan Chan’s chapter in this Companion for more on Pei Wei’s “Chongyou lun.”

  7. 7.

    Yu Dunkang uses Tang Yongtong’s argument to discuss Wang Bi’s learning of nothingness. See Yu 2007. Similarly, Brook Ziporyn uses Tang’s arguments to discuss Guo Xiang’s learning of somethingness. See Ziporyn 2015: 397–423.

  8. 8.

    See, for instance, Tang 1983 and Liang 1996.

  9. 9.

    See, for instance, Wagner 2003. Even Yu Dunkang occasionally expresses doubt about the sharp distinction of the learning of nothingness and the learning of somethingness. See Yu 2007: 117–124.

  10. 10.

    The editors of the Siku Quanshu 四庫全書 specifically identified Wang Bi’s commentary as an exemplar of the “meaning and principle” school of Yijing commentary. See Siku Quanshu Zongmu Tiyao 四庫全書總目提要 1933, Yijing section, 2.

  11. 11.

    Zhu 1984: 338–390.

  12. 12.

    Wagner and Yu, the two leading scholars of Wang Bi’s philosophy, base their arguments on a close reading of Wang’s Daodejing commentary rather than his Yijing commentary. See Wagner 2003; Yu 2007.

  13. 13.

    The “Ten Wings” are: (1–2) Tuanzhuan 彖傳 (Commentary on the Judgements); (3–4) Xiangzhuan 象傳 (Commentary on the Images); (5) Wenyan 文言 (Words of the Text); (6–7) Xici 繫辭 (Appended Statements, also known as Dazhuan 大傳, [The Great Treatise]); (8) Shuogua 說卦 (Explanation of the Trigrams); (9) Xugua 序卦 (Hexagrams in Sequence); (10) Zagua 雜卦 (Hexagrams in Irregular Order). For the transformation of the Yijing into a philosophical text, see Zhu 1984: 38–105.

  14. 14.

    Xici 1: chapters 3 and 8. For a translation, see Wilhelm and Baynes 1967: 290–293, 304–308.

  15. 15.

    Xici 2: chapter 7. For a translation, see Wilhelm and Baynes 1967: 345–348.

  16. 16.

    For the significance of fear and anxiety in the Yijing philosophy, see Redmond and Hon 2014: 128–139.

  17. 17.

    Xici 2: chapter 11. Wilhelm and Baynes 1967: 352; translation modified.

  18. 18.

    For a discussion of the Yijing warnings on disease and decay, see Redmond and Hon, 2014: 128–139.

  19. 19.

    Xici 2: chapter 7. Wilhelm and Baynes 1967: 348–349.

  20. 20.

    For the characteristics of Han thought, see Loewe 1994 and 2005; Wang 2000.

  21. 21.

    See Queen 1996: 1–53.

  22. 22.

    See Loewe 1994: 121–141; Pines 2009 and 2012.

  23. 23.

    For more, see Loewe 2011; Queen 1996.

  24. 24.

    For the new sequence of 64 hexagrams based on eight palaces, see Nielson 2003: 3.

  25. 25.

    For more, see Smith 2008: 62–77.

  26. 26.

    See Ch’en 1986: 798–801; Smith 2008: 62–88, 2012.

  27. 27.

    For a biography of Wang Bi, see Lynn 2015: 369–95; Lynn 1994: 10–15.

  28. 28.

    For more, see Hon 2010: 71–96.

  29. 29.

    These seven essays can be found in Lynn 1994: 25–39.

  30. 30.

    For a translation of this Xici passage, see Wilhelm and Baynes 1967: 310–313.

  31. 31.

    These three themes of shi (time), wei (position), and ying (response) are found in “clarifying how the hexagrams correspond to change and make the lines commensurate with it.” See Lynn 1994: 29–30.

  32. 32.

    For a detailed discussion of Wang Bi’s philosophy of change, see Hon 2003.

Bibliography

  • Chan, Alan K.L. 2009. “Neo-Daoism.” In Bo Mou, ed., History of Chinese Philosophy, 303-323. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1969. Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ch’en, Ch’i-Yun. 1986. “Confucian, Legalist, and Daoist Thought in Later Han.” In Cambridge History of China, volume 1, 766-807. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon, Tze-Ki. 2003. “Human Agency and Change: A Reading of Wang Bi’s Yijing Commentary.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 30.2: 223-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon, Tze-Ki. 2010. “Hexagrams and Politics: Wang Bi’s Political Philosophy in the Zhouyi Zhu.” In Alan K.L. Chan and Yuet Keung Lo, eds., Philosophy and Religion in Early Medieval China, 71-96. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Baoxuan 梁葆玹. 1996. A Study of the Learning of the Deep 玄學通論. Taipei: Wunan Tushu Chuban Gongsi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Zhongjun 林忠軍. 2005. A Study of Zheng Xuan’s Commentary on the Zhouyi 周易鄭氏學闡釋. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewe, Michael. 1986. “The Religious and Intellectual Background” and “The Concept of Sovereignty.” In Denis Twitchett and Michael Loewe, eds., Cambridge History of China, volume 1, 649–725; 726–746. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewe, Michael. 1994. Divination, Mythology and Monarchy in Han China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewe, Michael. 2005. Faith, Myth and Reason in Han China. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewe, Michael. 2011. Dong Zhongshu: A Confucian Heritage and the Chunqiu Fanlu. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, Yulie 樓宇烈. 1999. Collected Explanatory Annotations on Wang Bi’s Works 王弼集校釋. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, Richard J., trans. 1994. The Classic of Changes: A New Translation of the I Ching as Interpreted by Wang Bi. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, Richard J. 2015. “Wang Bi and Xuanxue.” In Xiaogan Liu, ed., Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy, 365-395. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Bent. 2003. A Companion to Yijing Numerology and Cosmology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, Yuri. 2009. Envisioning Eternal Empire: Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pines, Yuri. 2012. The Everlasting Empire: The Political Culture of Ancient China and its Imperial Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Queen, Sarah. 1996. From Chronicle to Canon: The Hermeneutics of the Spring and Autumn, According to Dong Zhongshu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Redmond, Geoffrey and Tze-Ki Hon. 2014. Teaching the I Ching (Book of Changes). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siku Quanshu. 1933. Summaries of the Entries of the Four Treasures of the Emperor 四庫全書總目提要. Shanghai: Shangwu Yinshuguan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Richard. 2008. Fathoming the Cosmos and Ordering the World: The Yijing and its Evolution in China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Richard. 2012. The I Ching: A Biography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Yijie 湯一介. 1983. Learning the Deep of the Wei-Jin Period 魏晉玄學. Huanggang: Hubei Renmin Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Yongtong 湯用彤. 2005. Preliminary Studies of Learning the Deep during the Wei-Jin Period 魏晉玄學論稿. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Rudolf. 2003. Language, Ontology, and Political Philosophy in China: Wang Bi’s Scholarly Exploration of the Dark. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Aihe. 2000. Cosmology and Political Culture in Early China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, Richard and Cary Baynes, trans. 1967. The I Ching or Book of Changes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Fuguan 徐復觀. 1976. The History of Thought of the Two Han Periods 兩漢思想史. Taibei: Taiwan Xuesheng Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Dunkang 余敦康. 2007. New Research on He Yan and Wang Bi’s Philosophy 何晏王弼玄学新探. Beijing: Fangzhi Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziporyn, Brook. 2015. “Guo Xiang: The Self-So and the Repudiation-cum Reaffirmation of Deliberate Action and Knowledge.” In Xiaogan Liu, ed., Dao Companion to Daoist Philosophy, 397-423. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Bokun 朱伯崐. 1984. The History of Yijing Philosophy 易學哲學史. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tze Ki Hon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hon, T.K. (2020). The Ontology of Change: Wang Bi’s Interpretation of the Yijing. In: Chai, D. (eds) Dao Companion to Xuanxue 玄學 (Neo-Daoism). Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49228-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics