Abstract
The commentary in this Part of the book focuses on a range of tensions that have developed from misjudged political meddling in fragile constitutional orders. The writers capture the extent to which the operation of constitutional settlements in divided, heterogeneous multinational European states can be affected by no small degree of political contingency. The timing of this thoughtful analysis is particularly auspicious given the development of a range of constitutional ruptures across Europe over the past few years. More specifically, the authors offer an account, through an eclectic and innovative array of methodological style, of how legal devices that often operate at the subterranean may in fact entrench communal division in a crisis. Read together, then, these chapters offer an innovative exploration of a range of legal responses to acute constitutional stress in several divided European nation states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See in this volume Yaniv Roznai and Richard Albert, ‘The Depth and Diversity of Modern Pressures on Constitutionalism’.
- 2.
See R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, and R (Miller) v The Minister; Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland [2019] UKSC 41. See also, e.g., Ewing K (2017) Brexit and Parliamentary Sovereignty. Mod L R 80(4):711–726.
- 3.
Roznai and Albert, n 1.
- 4.
Gross O (2000) The Normless and Exceptionless Exception: Carl Schmitt’s Theory of Emergency Powers and the “Norm-Exception” Dichotomy’. Cardozo L. Rev. 21:1825–1868.
- 5.
de Wilde M (2010) Locke and the State of Exception: Towards a Modern Understanding of Emergency Government. 6 Eur. Con. L. Rev. 249–267.
- 6.
Wolff S (2010) Cases of Asymmetrical Territorial Autonomy. In: Weller M, Nobbs K (eds) Asymmetric Autonomy and the Settlement of Ethnic Conflicts, University of Pennsylvanian Press, 17–47.
References
Albert R, Roznai Y (2020) The depth and diversity of modern pressures on constitutionalism. In Albert R, Roznai Y (eds) Constitutionalism under extreme conditions. Springer, pp 1–13
de Wilde M (2010) Locke and the state of exception: towards a modern understanding of emergency government. Eur Con L Rev 6:249–267
Ewing K (2017) Brexit and parliamentary sovereignty. Mod L R 80(4):711–726
Gross O (2000) The normless and exceptionless exception: Carl Schmitt’s theory of emergency powers and the “Norm-Exception” dichotomy’. Cardozo L Rev 21:1825–1868
Wolff S (2010) Cases of asymmetrical territorial autonomy. In: Weller M, Nobbs K (eds) Asymmetric autonomy and the settlement of ethnic conflicts. University of Pennsylvanian Press, pp 17–47
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graham, P. (2020). Introduction: Constitutionalism for Divided Societies. In: Albert, R., Roznai, Y. (eds) Constitutionalism Under Extreme Conditions. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 82. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49000-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49000-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48999-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49000-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)